Cargando…

Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century

BACKGROUND: In the decades following the discovery of the bacillus causing typhoid, in 1880, understanding of the disease formerly known as enteric fever was transformed, offering new possibilities for prevention. Gradually, measures that aimed to prevent infection from human carriers were developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gradmann, Christoph, Harrison, Mark, Rasmussen, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz672
_version_ 1783459081837608960
author Gradmann, Christoph
Harrison, Mark
Rasmussen, Anne
author_facet Gradmann, Christoph
Harrison, Mark
Rasmussen, Anne
author_sort Gradmann, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the decades following the discovery of the bacillus causing typhoid, in 1880, understanding of the disease formerly known as enteric fever was transformed, offering new possibilities for prevention. Gradually, measures that aimed to prevent infection from human carriers were developed, as were inoculations designed to confer immunity against typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. These were initially introduced in European armies that were regularly ravaged by typhoid, especially garrisons stationed in the colonies. This article reviews the research undertaken in the armed forces and the measures that they implemented in the years up to and during the First World War. METHODS: The article is based on an analytical review of scientific literature from the early 19th century, focusing on the United Kingdom, Germany, and France. RESULTS: The armies of the United Kingdom, Germany, and France undertook important work on the transmission of typhoid in the years between 1890 and 1918. Many preventive measures were introduced to deal with the spread of typhoid but these varied between the 3 countries, depending largely on their political traditions. Inoculation was particularly successful in preventing typhoid and greatly reduced the number of casualties from this disease during the First World War. Despite this, it proved difficult to prevent paratyphoid infection, and debates continued over which vaccines to use and whether or not immunization should be voluntary. CONCLUSIONS: By the end of the First World War, the value of inoculation in preventing the spread of typhoid had been proven. Its successful implementation demonstrates the importance of vaccination as a public health intervention during times of conflict and social upheaval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6792098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67920982019-10-21 Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century Gradmann, Christoph Harrison, Mark Rasmussen, Anne Clin Infect Dis Supplement Articles BACKGROUND: In the decades following the discovery of the bacillus causing typhoid, in 1880, understanding of the disease formerly known as enteric fever was transformed, offering new possibilities for prevention. Gradually, measures that aimed to prevent infection from human carriers were developed, as were inoculations designed to confer immunity against typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. These were initially introduced in European armies that were regularly ravaged by typhoid, especially garrisons stationed in the colonies. This article reviews the research undertaken in the armed forces and the measures that they implemented in the years up to and during the First World War. METHODS: The article is based on an analytical review of scientific literature from the early 19th century, focusing on the United Kingdom, Germany, and France. RESULTS: The armies of the United Kingdom, Germany, and France undertook important work on the transmission of typhoid in the years between 1890 and 1918. Many preventive measures were introduced to deal with the spread of typhoid but these varied between the 3 countries, depending largely on their political traditions. Inoculation was particularly successful in preventing typhoid and greatly reduced the number of casualties from this disease during the First World War. Despite this, it proved difficult to prevent paratyphoid infection, and debates continued over which vaccines to use and whether or not immunization should be voluntary. CONCLUSIONS: By the end of the First World War, the value of inoculation in preventing the spread of typhoid had been proven. Its successful implementation demonstrates the importance of vaccination as a public health intervention during times of conflict and social upheaval. Oxford University Press 2019-11-01 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6792098/ /pubmed/31612937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz672 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Gradmann, Christoph
Harrison, Mark
Rasmussen, Anne
Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title_full Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title_fullStr Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title_full_unstemmed Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title_short Typhoid and the Military in the Early 20th Century
title_sort typhoid and the military in the early 20th century
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz672
work_keys_str_mv AT gradmannchristoph typhoidandthemilitaryintheearly20thcentury
AT harrisonmark typhoidandthemilitaryintheearly20thcentury
AT rasmussenanne typhoidandthemilitaryintheearly20thcentury