Cargando…

Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins

MOTIVATION: Despite intense effort, it has been difficult to explain chaperone dependencies of proteins from sequence or structural properties. RESULTS: We constructed a database collecting all publicly available data of experimental chaperone interaction and dependency data for the Escherichia coli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramakrishnan, Reshmi, Houben, Bert, Rousseau, Frederic, Schymkowitz, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz214
_version_ 1783459083279400960
author Ramakrishnan, Reshmi
Houben, Bert
Rousseau, Frederic
Schymkowitz, Joost
author_facet Ramakrishnan, Reshmi
Houben, Bert
Rousseau, Frederic
Schymkowitz, Joost
author_sort Ramakrishnan, Reshmi
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Despite intense effort, it has been difficult to explain chaperone dependencies of proteins from sequence or structural properties. RESULTS: We constructed a database collecting all publicly available data of experimental chaperone interaction and dependency data for the Escherichia coli proteome, and enriched it with an extensive set of protein-specific as well as cell-context-dependent proteostatic parameters. Employing this new resource, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of the key determinants of chaperone interaction. Our study confirms that GroEL client proteins are biased toward insoluble proteins of low abundance, but for client proteins of the Trigger Factor/DnaK axis, we instead find that cellular parameters such as high protein abundance, translational efficiency and mRNA turnover are key determinants. We experimentally confirmed the finding that chaperone dependence is a function of translation rate and not protein-intrinsic parameters by tuning chaperone dependence of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) in E.coli by synonymous mutations only. The juxtaposition of both protein-intrinsic and cell-contextual chaperone triage mechanisms explains how the E.coli proteome achieves combining reliable production of abundant and conserved proteins, while also enabling the evolution of diverging metabolic functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The database will be made available via http://phdb.switchlab.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6792106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67921062019-10-18 Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins Ramakrishnan, Reshmi Houben, Bert Rousseau, Frederic Schymkowitz, Joost Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Despite intense effort, it has been difficult to explain chaperone dependencies of proteins from sequence or structural properties. RESULTS: We constructed a database collecting all publicly available data of experimental chaperone interaction and dependency data for the Escherichia coli proteome, and enriched it with an extensive set of protein-specific as well as cell-context-dependent proteostatic parameters. Employing this new resource, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of the key determinants of chaperone interaction. Our study confirms that GroEL client proteins are biased toward insoluble proteins of low abundance, but for client proteins of the Trigger Factor/DnaK axis, we instead find that cellular parameters such as high protein abundance, translational efficiency and mRNA turnover are key determinants. We experimentally confirmed the finding that chaperone dependence is a function of translation rate and not protein-intrinsic parameters by tuning chaperone dependence of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) in E.coli by synonymous mutations only. The juxtaposition of both protein-intrinsic and cell-contextual chaperone triage mechanisms explains how the E.coli proteome achieves combining reliable production of abundant and conserved proteins, while also enabling the evolution of diverging metabolic functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The database will be made available via http://phdb.switchlab.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2019-10-15 2019-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6792106/ /pubmed/30903148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz214 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Papers
Ramakrishnan, Reshmi
Houben, Bert
Rousseau, Frederic
Schymkowitz, Joost
Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title_full Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title_fullStr Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title_full_unstemmed Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title_short Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
title_sort differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz214
work_keys_str_mv AT ramakrishnanreshmi differentialproteostaticregulationofinsolubleandabundantproteins
AT houbenbert differentialproteostaticregulationofinsolubleandabundantproteins
AT rousseaufrederic differentialproteostaticregulationofinsolubleandabundantproteins
AT schymkowitzjoost differentialproteostaticregulationofinsolubleandabundantproteins