Cargando…
Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer
INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was designed as a minimally invasive method for evaluation of nodal involvement in patients with penile cancer and nonpalpable lymph nodes. Nevertheless, SLNB is not used in a regular basis due to the lack of studies that adequately characterize the pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619867 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_79_19 |
_version_ | 1783459151879340032 |
---|---|
author | Ramos, Jose Gustavo Jaramillo, David Camilo Sandoval, David Gallego, Laura Juliana Riveros, Carlos Sierra, Jonathan Armando Vargas, Isis López De Mesa López, Byron Eduardo Ibata, Linda Varela, Rodolfo |
author_facet | Ramos, Jose Gustavo Jaramillo, David Camilo Sandoval, David Gallego, Laura Juliana Riveros, Carlos Sierra, Jonathan Armando Vargas, Isis López De Mesa López, Byron Eduardo Ibata, Linda Varela, Rodolfo |
author_sort | Ramos, Jose Gustavo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was designed as a minimally invasive method for evaluation of nodal involvement in patients with penile cancer and nonpalpable lymph nodes. Nevertheless, SLNB is not used in a regular basis due to the lack of studies that adequately characterize the performance of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SLNB in patients with infiltrative penile carcinoma without palpable inguinal lymph nodes in a Colombian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 89 patients diagnosed with infiltrative penile squamous cell carcinoma with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes. These patients underwent partial or complete penectomy, along with SLNB, between 2008 and 2017. Those individuals with a positive SLNB underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, while those with a negative SLNB were followed on a quarterly basis with a physical examination and imaging to assess relapse. Statistical analysis was done using the STATA 14 software. A contingency table was made to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and exactitude, each one with its own confidence interval (CI) of 95%. RESULTS: There was an average follow-up of 31.4 months, and all 89 patients were evaluated; most primary tumors were T2 (55%), followed by T1 (37%), all of which were subclassified as T1b and T3 (8%). Tumours were most frequently located in the glans (43%). All patients were classified as cN0 and underwent SLNB. Sixty-one patients (69%) tested negative in the SLNB, four of whom (6%) presented with lymph node relapse. On the other hand, 28 patients (31%) tested positive in the SLNB and consequently underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, seven of whom had negative lymph nodeinvolvement (25% false positives). According to the results, the sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 65.3–93.6) and the specificity was 89% (95% CI, 79.4–94.7), with a false-negative rate of 6.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The SLNB using radiotracer can be a useful method for lymph node staging in patients with penile cancer and nonpalpable lymph nodes when performed in experienced centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6792417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67924172019-10-16 Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer Ramos, Jose Gustavo Jaramillo, David Camilo Sandoval, David Gallego, Laura Juliana Riveros, Carlos Sierra, Jonathan Armando Vargas, Isis López De Mesa López, Byron Eduardo Ibata, Linda Varela, Rodolfo Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was designed as a minimally invasive method for evaluation of nodal involvement in patients with penile cancer and nonpalpable lymph nodes. Nevertheless, SLNB is not used in a regular basis due to the lack of studies that adequately characterize the performance of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SLNB in patients with infiltrative penile carcinoma without palpable inguinal lymph nodes in a Colombian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 89 patients diagnosed with infiltrative penile squamous cell carcinoma with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes. These patients underwent partial or complete penectomy, along with SLNB, between 2008 and 2017. Those individuals with a positive SLNB underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, while those with a negative SLNB were followed on a quarterly basis with a physical examination and imaging to assess relapse. Statistical analysis was done using the STATA 14 software. A contingency table was made to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and exactitude, each one with its own confidence interval (CI) of 95%. RESULTS: There was an average follow-up of 31.4 months, and all 89 patients were evaluated; most primary tumors were T2 (55%), followed by T1 (37%), all of which were subclassified as T1b and T3 (8%). Tumours were most frequently located in the glans (43%). All patients were classified as cN0 and underwent SLNB. Sixty-one patients (69%) tested negative in the SLNB, four of whom (6%) presented with lymph node relapse. On the other hand, 28 patients (31%) tested positive in the SLNB and consequently underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, seven of whom had negative lymph nodeinvolvement (25% false positives). According to the results, the sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 65.3–93.6) and the specificity was 89% (95% CI, 79.4–94.7), with a false-negative rate of 6.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The SLNB using radiotracer can be a useful method for lymph node staging in patients with penile cancer and nonpalpable lymph nodes when performed in experienced centers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6792417/ /pubmed/31619867 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_79_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramos, Jose Gustavo Jaramillo, David Camilo Sandoval, David Gallego, Laura Juliana Riveros, Carlos Sierra, Jonathan Armando Vargas, Isis López De Mesa López, Byron Eduardo Ibata, Linda Varela, Rodolfo Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title | Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic precision of sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6792417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619867 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_79_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramosjosegustavo diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT jaramillodavidcamilo diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT sandovaldavid diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT gallegolaurajuliana diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT riveroscarlos diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT sierrajonathanarmando diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT vargasisis diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT lopezdemesalopezbyroneduardo diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT ibatalinda diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer AT varelarodolfo diagnosticprecisionofsentinellymphnodebiopsyinpenilecancer |