Cargando…
Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils
Soil pH is a critical soil quality index and controls soil microbial activities, soil nutrient availability, and plant roots growth and development. The current study aims to evaluate various pedotransfer functions for predicting soil pH using different geochemical indices (CaO, ratios of Al(2)O(3),...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6793886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31613923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223764 |
_version_ | 1783459211652366336 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Wei Liu, Hong-Bin |
author_facet | Wu, Wei Liu, Hong-Bin |
author_sort | Wu, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soil pH is a critical soil quality index and controls soil microbial activities, soil nutrient availability, and plant roots growth and development. The current study aims to evaluate various pedotransfer functions for predicting soil pH using different geochemical indices (CaO, ratios of Al(2)O(3), Fe(2)O(3), TiO(2), SiO(2), MgO, and K(2)O to CaO) in forest soils. Various models including empirical functions (quadratic, cubic, sigmoid, logarithmic) and artificial neural network with these geochemical indices were assessed by independent testing set. Mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R(2)), t-statistics (t-stat), and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) were applied to evaluate the model performances. Additionally, a new indicator (global performance indictor, GPI) was originally introduced in this study and was used to rank these models. According to GPI, the sigmoid functions and ANNs performed better than others. On average, they could explain above 70% of the variability in soil pH. Both model structure and dataset shape impact on model performance. The best input was CaO for ANNs, sigmoid, and logarithmic functions. The ratios of K(2)O to CaO and Al(2)O(3) to CaO were the best inputs for quadratic and cubic equations, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6793886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67938862019-10-25 Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils Wu, Wei Liu, Hong-Bin PLoS One Research Article Soil pH is a critical soil quality index and controls soil microbial activities, soil nutrient availability, and plant roots growth and development. The current study aims to evaluate various pedotransfer functions for predicting soil pH using different geochemical indices (CaO, ratios of Al(2)O(3), Fe(2)O(3), TiO(2), SiO(2), MgO, and K(2)O to CaO) in forest soils. Various models including empirical functions (quadratic, cubic, sigmoid, logarithmic) and artificial neural network with these geochemical indices were assessed by independent testing set. Mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R(2)), t-statistics (t-stat), and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) were applied to evaluate the model performances. Additionally, a new indicator (global performance indictor, GPI) was originally introduced in this study and was used to rank these models. According to GPI, the sigmoid functions and ANNs performed better than others. On average, they could explain above 70% of the variability in soil pH. Both model structure and dataset shape impact on model performance. The best input was CaO for ANNs, sigmoid, and logarithmic functions. The ratios of K(2)O to CaO and Al(2)O(3) to CaO were the best inputs for quadratic and cubic equations, respectively. Public Library of Science 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6793886/ /pubmed/31613923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223764 Text en © 2019 Wu, Liu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Wei Liu, Hong-Bin Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title | Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title_full | Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title_fullStr | Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title_short | Estimation of soil pH with geochemical indices in forest soils |
title_sort | estimation of soil ph with geochemical indices in forest soils |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6793886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31613923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuwei estimationofsoilphwithgeochemicalindicesinforestsoils AT liuhongbin estimationofsoilphwithgeochemicalindicesinforestsoils |