Cargando…
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks
Animals, including humans, consistently exhibit myopia in two different contexts: foraging, in which they harvest locally beyond what is predicted by optimal foraging theory, and intertemporal choice, in which they exhibit a preference for immediate vs. delayed rewards beyond what is predicted by ra...
Autores principales: | Kane, Gary A, Bornstein, Aaron M, Shenhav, Amitai, Wilson, Robert C, Daw, Nathaniel D, Cohen, Jonathan D |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532391 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48429 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Anterior Cingulate Engagement in a Foraging Context Reflects Choice Difficulty, Not Foraging Value
por: Shenhav, Amitai, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Monkeys Are More Patient in a Foraging Task than in a Standard Intertemporal Choice Task
por: Blanchard, Tommy C., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Biased belief updating and suboptimal choice in foraging decisions
por: Garrett, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Sunk costs account for rats’ decisions on an intertemporal foraging task
por: Wikenheiser, Andrew M, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans
por: Bornstein, Aaron M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)