Cargando…

The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades

One of the core mechanisms involved in the control of saccade responses to selected target stimuli is the disengagement from the current fixation location, so that the next saccade can be executed. To carry out everyday visual tasks, we make multiple eye movements that can be programmed in parallel....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McSorley, Eugene, Gilchrist, Iain D., McCloy, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05641-9
_version_ 1783459248635641856
author McSorley, Eugene
Gilchrist, Iain D.
McCloy, Rachel
author_facet McSorley, Eugene
Gilchrist, Iain D.
McCloy, Rachel
author_sort McSorley, Eugene
collection PubMed
description One of the core mechanisms involved in the control of saccade responses to selected target stimuli is the disengagement from the current fixation location, so that the next saccade can be executed. To carry out everyday visual tasks, we make multiple eye movements that can be programmed in parallel. However, the role of disengagement in the parallel programming of saccades has not been examined. It is well established that the need for disengagement slows down saccadic response time. This may be important in allowing the system to program accurate eye movements and have a role to play in the control of multiple eye movements but as yet this remains untested. Here, we report two experiments that seek to examine whether fixation disengagement reduces saccade latencies when the task completion demands multiple saccade responses. A saccade contingent paradigm was employed and participants were asked to execute saccadic eye movements to a series of seven targets while manipulating when these targets were shown. This both promotes fixation disengagement and controls the extent that parallel programming can occur. We found that trial duration decreased as more targets were made available prior to fixation: this was a result both of a reduction in the number of saccades being executed and in their saccade latencies. This supports the view that even when fixation disengagement is not required, parallel programming of multiple sequential saccadic eye movements is still present. By comparison with previous published data, we demonstrate a substantial speeded of response times in these condition (“a gap effect”) and that parallel programming is attenuated in these conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6794246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67942462019-10-17 The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades McSorley, Eugene Gilchrist, Iain D. McCloy, Rachel Exp Brain Res Research Article One of the core mechanisms involved in the control of saccade responses to selected target stimuli is the disengagement from the current fixation location, so that the next saccade can be executed. To carry out everyday visual tasks, we make multiple eye movements that can be programmed in parallel. However, the role of disengagement in the parallel programming of saccades has not been examined. It is well established that the need for disengagement slows down saccadic response time. This may be important in allowing the system to program accurate eye movements and have a role to play in the control of multiple eye movements but as yet this remains untested. Here, we report two experiments that seek to examine whether fixation disengagement reduces saccade latencies when the task completion demands multiple saccade responses. A saccade contingent paradigm was employed and participants were asked to execute saccadic eye movements to a series of seven targets while manipulating when these targets were shown. This both promotes fixation disengagement and controls the extent that parallel programming can occur. We found that trial duration decreased as more targets were made available prior to fixation: this was a result both of a reduction in the number of saccades being executed and in their saccade latencies. This supports the view that even when fixation disengagement is not required, parallel programming of multiple sequential saccadic eye movements is still present. By comparison with previous published data, we demonstrate a substantial speeded of response times in these condition (“a gap effect”) and that parallel programming is attenuated in these conditions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6794246/ /pubmed/31531688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05641-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
McSorley, Eugene
Gilchrist, Iain D.
McCloy, Rachel
The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title_full The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title_fullStr The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title_full_unstemmed The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title_short The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
title_sort role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05641-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcsorleyeugene theroleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades
AT gilchristiaind theroleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades
AT mccloyrachel theroleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades
AT mcsorleyeugene roleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades
AT gilchristiaind roleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades
AT mccloyrachel roleoffixationdisengagementintheparallelprogrammingofsequencesofsaccades