Cargando…
The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9 |
_version_ | 1783459266480308224 |
---|---|
author | Blans, M. J. Bosch, F. H. van der Hoeven, J. G. |
author_facet | Blans, M. J. Bosch, F. H. van der Hoeven, J. G. |
author_sort | Blans, M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient which makes it possible to measure CO using TTE in a fixed position possibly making the CO measurements more accurate compared to separate TTE CO measurements. The feasibility of the use of the Probefix to measure CO before and after a passive leg raising test (PLR) was studied. Intensive care patients were included after detection of hypovolemia using Flotrac. Endpoints were the possibility to use Probefix. Also CO measurements with and without the use of Probefix, before and after a PLR were compared to the CO measurements using Flotrac. Side effects in terms of skin alterations after the use of Probefix and patient’s comments on (dis)comfort were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients were included; in eight patients, sufficient recordings with the use of Probefix could be obtained. Using Bland–Altman plots, no difference was found in accuracy of measurements of CO with or without the use of Probefix before and after a PLR compared to Flotrac generated CO. There were only mild and temporary skin effects of the use of Probefix. CONCLUSIONS: In this small feasibility study, the Probefix could be used in eight out of ten intensive care patients. The use of Probefix did not result in more or less accurate CO measurements compared to manually recorded TTE CO measurements. We suggest that larger studies on the use of Probefix in intensive care patients are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6794331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67943312019-10-17 The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study Blans, M. J. Bosch, F. H. van der Hoeven, J. G. Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient which makes it possible to measure CO using TTE in a fixed position possibly making the CO measurements more accurate compared to separate TTE CO measurements. The feasibility of the use of the Probefix to measure CO before and after a passive leg raising test (PLR) was studied. Intensive care patients were included after detection of hypovolemia using Flotrac. Endpoints were the possibility to use Probefix. Also CO measurements with and without the use of Probefix, before and after a PLR were compared to the CO measurements using Flotrac. Side effects in terms of skin alterations after the use of Probefix and patient’s comments on (dis)comfort were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients were included; in eight patients, sufficient recordings with the use of Probefix could be obtained. Using Bland–Altman plots, no difference was found in accuracy of measurements of CO with or without the use of Probefix before and after a PLR compared to Flotrac generated CO. There were only mild and temporary skin effects of the use of Probefix. CONCLUSIONS: In this small feasibility study, the Probefix could be used in eight out of ten intensive care patients. The use of Probefix did not result in more or less accurate CO measurements compared to manually recorded TTE CO measurements. We suggest that larger studies on the use of Probefix in intensive care patients are needed. Springer Milan 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6794331/ /pubmed/31617021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Blans, M. J. Bosch, F. H. van der Hoeven, J. G. The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title | The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title_full | The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title_short | The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
title_sort | use of an external ultrasound fixator (probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blansmj theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT boschfh theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT vanderhoevenjg theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT blansmj useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT boschfh useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT vanderhoevenjg useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy |