Cargando…

The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blans, M. J., Bosch, F. H., van der Hoeven, J. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9
_version_ 1783459266480308224
author Blans, M. J.
Bosch, F. H.
van der Hoeven, J. G.
author_facet Blans, M. J.
Bosch, F. H.
van der Hoeven, J. G.
author_sort Blans, M. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient which makes it possible to measure CO using TTE in a fixed position possibly making the CO measurements more accurate compared to separate TTE CO measurements. The feasibility of the use of the Probefix to measure CO before and after a passive leg raising test (PLR) was studied. Intensive care patients were included after detection of hypovolemia using Flotrac. Endpoints were the possibility to use Probefix. Also CO measurements with and without the use of Probefix, before and after a PLR were compared to the CO measurements using Flotrac. Side effects in terms of skin alterations after the use of Probefix and patient’s comments on (dis)comfort were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients were included; in eight patients, sufficient recordings with the use of Probefix could be obtained. Using Bland–Altman plots, no difference was found in accuracy of measurements of CO with or without the use of Probefix before and after a PLR compared to Flotrac generated CO. There were only mild and temporary skin effects of the use of Probefix. CONCLUSIONS: In this small feasibility study, the Probefix could be used in eight out of ten intensive care patients. The use of Probefix did not result in more or less accurate CO measurements compared to manually recorded TTE CO measurements. We suggest that larger studies on the use of Probefix in intensive care patients are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6794331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67943312019-10-17 The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study Blans, M. J. Bosch, F. H. van der Hoeven, J. G. Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: In critical care medicine, the use of transthoracic echo (TTE) is expanding. TTE can be used to measure dynamic parameters such as cardiac output (CO). An important asset of TTE is that it is a non-invasive technique. The Probefix is an external ultrasound holder strapped to the patient which makes it possible to measure CO using TTE in a fixed position possibly making the CO measurements more accurate compared to separate TTE CO measurements. The feasibility of the use of the Probefix to measure CO before and after a passive leg raising test (PLR) was studied. Intensive care patients were included after detection of hypovolemia using Flotrac. Endpoints were the possibility to use Probefix. Also CO measurements with and without the use of Probefix, before and after a PLR were compared to the CO measurements using Flotrac. Side effects in terms of skin alterations after the use of Probefix and patient’s comments on (dis)comfort were evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients were included; in eight patients, sufficient recordings with the use of Probefix could be obtained. Using Bland–Altman plots, no difference was found in accuracy of measurements of CO with or without the use of Probefix before and after a PLR compared to Flotrac generated CO. There were only mild and temporary skin effects of the use of Probefix. CONCLUSIONS: In this small feasibility study, the Probefix could be used in eight out of ten intensive care patients. The use of Probefix did not result in more or less accurate CO measurements compared to manually recorded TTE CO measurements. We suggest that larger studies on the use of Probefix in intensive care patients are needed. Springer Milan 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6794331/ /pubmed/31617021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Blans, M. J.
Bosch, F. H.
van der Hoeven, J. G.
The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title_full The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title_fullStr The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title_short The use of an external ultrasound fixator (Probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
title_sort use of an external ultrasound fixator (probefix) on intensive care patients: a feasibility study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0140-9
work_keys_str_mv AT blansmj theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT boschfh theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT vanderhoevenjg theuseofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT blansmj useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT boschfh useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT vanderhoevenjg useofanexternalultrasoundfixatorprobefixonintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudy