Cargando…

Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection

BACKGROUND: Most international guidelines recommend empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to be based on site of care. Some patients with severe CAP are managed in general wards because of limited intensive care unit (ICU) bed or because of unrecognition of the pneumonia severity....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongsurakiat, Phunsup, Chitwarakorn, Napat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0944-1
_version_ 1783459385809305600
author Wongsurakiat, Phunsup
Chitwarakorn, Napat
author_facet Wongsurakiat, Phunsup
Chitwarakorn, Napat
author_sort Wongsurakiat, Phunsup
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most international guidelines recommend empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to be based on site of care. Some patients with severe CAP are managed in general wards because of limited intensive care unit (ICU) bed or because of unrecognition of the pneumonia severity. Appropriate initial antibiotic treatment for severe CAP outside ICU has not yet been established. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and the impact of initial antibiotic selection on the outcomes of patients with severe CAP who were admitted and managing in general wards. METHODS: This prospective observational study included consecutive patients hospitalized for presumed CAP in general wards over a 1-year period. Severe CAP was identified using the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria. Initial antibiotic treatment in the first 24 h were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcome (composite outcome of treatment failure and in-hospital death). The secondary outcome was the number of hospital-free days assessed 30 days after enrollment into the study. RESULTS: There were 94 patients hospitalized with CAP of which 50 (53.2%) patients were compatible with severe CAP. An etiologic diagnosis was found in 43 (45.8%) patients. The most common pathogens identified in patients with severe CAP were Staphylococcus aureus (28.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (28.6%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.9%). Patients with severe CAP had significantly more positive blood culture than patients with non-severe CAP (24% VS 4.5%; p = .008). Initial antibiotic treatment were discordant with the IDSA/ATS guidelines in 42% of all patients hospitalized with CAP, and 52% of patients with severe CAP. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01–1.1) and initial antibiotic treatment discordant to guidelines for severe CAP in ICU (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3–17.1) were independent risk factors of the unfavorable outcome of patients with severe CAP. Patients with unfavorable outcome had lower number of hospital-free days than patients with favorable outcome (5.2 ± 8 days VS 18 ± 7.1 days; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe CAP outside ICU should be recognized for appropriate initial antibiotic selection to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6794881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67948812019-10-21 Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection Wongsurakiat, Phunsup Chitwarakorn, Napat BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Most international guidelines recommend empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to be based on site of care. Some patients with severe CAP are managed in general wards because of limited intensive care unit (ICU) bed or because of unrecognition of the pneumonia severity. Appropriate initial antibiotic treatment for severe CAP outside ICU has not yet been established. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and the impact of initial antibiotic selection on the outcomes of patients with severe CAP who were admitted and managing in general wards. METHODS: This prospective observational study included consecutive patients hospitalized for presumed CAP in general wards over a 1-year period. Severe CAP was identified using the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria. Initial antibiotic treatment in the first 24 h were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcome (composite outcome of treatment failure and in-hospital death). The secondary outcome was the number of hospital-free days assessed 30 days after enrollment into the study. RESULTS: There were 94 patients hospitalized with CAP of which 50 (53.2%) patients were compatible with severe CAP. An etiologic diagnosis was found in 43 (45.8%) patients. The most common pathogens identified in patients with severe CAP were Staphylococcus aureus (28.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (28.6%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.9%). Patients with severe CAP had significantly more positive blood culture than patients with non-severe CAP (24% VS 4.5%; p = .008). Initial antibiotic treatment were discordant with the IDSA/ATS guidelines in 42% of all patients hospitalized with CAP, and 52% of patients with severe CAP. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01–1.1) and initial antibiotic treatment discordant to guidelines for severe CAP in ICU (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3–17.1) were independent risk factors of the unfavorable outcome of patients with severe CAP. Patients with unfavorable outcome had lower number of hospital-free days than patients with favorable outcome (5.2 ± 8 days VS 18 ± 7.1 days; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe CAP outside ICU should be recognized for appropriate initial antibiotic selection to improve outcomes. BioMed Central 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6794881/ /pubmed/31619219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0944-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wongsurakiat, Phunsup
Chitwarakorn, Napat
Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title_full Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title_fullStr Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title_full_unstemmed Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title_short Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
title_sort severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0944-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wongsurakiatphunsup severecommunityacquiredpneumoniaingeneralmedicalwardsoutcomesandimpactofinitialantibioticselection
AT chitwarakornnapat severecommunityacquiredpneumoniaingeneralmedicalwardsoutcomesandimpactofinitialantibioticselection