Cargando…

Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent

This paper illustrates how concepts of mental disorder have been deployed to medicalize negative emotions and, thereby, weaken the political agency of some individuals. First, I theorise the link between political agency and emotions, arguing that effective political action entails the transformatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Degerman, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438334
_version_ 1783459466776150016
author Degerman, Dan
author_facet Degerman, Dan
author_sort Degerman, Dan
collection PubMed
description This paper illustrates how concepts of mental disorder have been deployed to medicalize negative emotions and, thereby, weaken the political agency of some individuals. First, I theorise the link between political agency and emotions, arguing that effective political action entails the transformation of emotions into public issues. Using the British referendum on membership in the EU as a case study, I then examine how medically loaded terms and rhetoric were used to describe suffering after the vote. Finally, I argue that this generated conditions that interrupted or even reversed the transformation of subjective experiences into politically meaningful issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6795550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67955502019-10-16 Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent Degerman, Dan Crit Rev Int Soc Political Philos Article This paper illustrates how concepts of mental disorder have been deployed to medicalize negative emotions and, thereby, weaken the political agency of some individuals. First, I theorise the link between political agency and emotions, arguing that effective political action entails the transformation of emotions into public issues. Using the British referendum on membership in the EU as a case study, I then examine how medically loaded terms and rhetoric were used to describe suffering after the vote. Finally, I argue that this generated conditions that interrupted or even reversed the transformation of subjective experiences into politically meaningful issues. Routledge 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6795550/ /pubmed/31619941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438334 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Degerman, Dan
Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title_full Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title_fullStr Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title_full_unstemmed Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title_short Brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
title_sort brexit anxiety: a case study in the medicalization of dissent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1438334
work_keys_str_mv AT degermandan brexitanxietyacasestudyinthemedicalizationofdissent