Cargando…

Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, increasing with age and affecting quality of life. While numerous OAB drugs are available, persistence is low. We evaluated evidence published since 2012 to determine if newer drugs provided better efficacy and harm profiles. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Frances C., Weeks, Chandler E., Selph, Shelley S., Blazina, Ian, Holmes, Rebecca S., McDonagh, Marian S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04022-8
_version_ 1783459478122790912
author Hsu, Frances C.
Weeks, Chandler E.
Selph, Shelley S.
Blazina, Ian
Holmes, Rebecca S.
McDonagh, Marian S.
author_facet Hsu, Frances C.
Weeks, Chandler E.
Selph, Shelley S.
Blazina, Ian
Holmes, Rebecca S.
McDonagh, Marian S.
author_sort Hsu, Frances C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, increasing with age and affecting quality of life. While numerous OAB drugs are available, persistence is low. We evaluated evidence published since 2012 to determine if newer drugs provided better efficacy and harm profiles. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 2012 to September 2018 using terms for included drugs and requested information from manufacturers of included drugs. We performed dual review of all systematic review processes, evaluated study quality, and conducted meta-analyses using random effects models. RESULTS: In addition to 31 older studies, we included 20 trials published since 2012 (N = 16,478; 4 good, 11 fair, and 5 poor quality). Where statistical differences were found, they were clinically small (reductions of < 0.5 episodes/day). Solifenacin plus mirabegron improved efficacy outcomes over monotherapy with either drug, but significantly increased constipation compared with solifenacin and dry mouth compared with mirabegron. Solifenacin reduced incontinence over mirabegron and tolterodine and urgency episodes over tolterodine. Mirabegron did not differ from tolterodine in efficacy but had significantly lower incidence of dry mouth than solifenacin or tolterodine. Fesoterodine showed significant improvements but also anticholinergic effects vs. tolterodine. Oxybutynin, solifenacin, and tolterodine had similar efficacy, but dry mouth led to greater discontinuation with oxybutynin. Blurred vision, cardiac arrhythmia, and dizziness were uncommon. CONCLUSION: New evidence confirms small, but clinically uncertain, differences among monotherapies and also between combination and monotherapy, regardless of statistical significance. While drugs mainly differed in incidence of dry mouth or constipation, none provided improved efficacy without increased harms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04022-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6795617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67956172019-10-25 Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review Hsu, Frances C. Weeks, Chandler E. Selph, Shelley S. Blazina, Ian Holmes, Rebecca S. McDonagh, Marian S. Int Urogynecol J Review Article INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, increasing with age and affecting quality of life. While numerous OAB drugs are available, persistence is low. We evaluated evidence published since 2012 to determine if newer drugs provided better efficacy and harm profiles. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 2012 to September 2018 using terms for included drugs and requested information from manufacturers of included drugs. We performed dual review of all systematic review processes, evaluated study quality, and conducted meta-analyses using random effects models. RESULTS: In addition to 31 older studies, we included 20 trials published since 2012 (N = 16,478; 4 good, 11 fair, and 5 poor quality). Where statistical differences were found, they were clinically small (reductions of < 0.5 episodes/day). Solifenacin plus mirabegron improved efficacy outcomes over monotherapy with either drug, but significantly increased constipation compared with solifenacin and dry mouth compared with mirabegron. Solifenacin reduced incontinence over mirabegron and tolterodine and urgency episodes over tolterodine. Mirabegron did not differ from tolterodine in efficacy but had significantly lower incidence of dry mouth than solifenacin or tolterodine. Fesoterodine showed significant improvements but also anticholinergic effects vs. tolterodine. Oxybutynin, solifenacin, and tolterodine had similar efficacy, but dry mouth led to greater discontinuation with oxybutynin. Blurred vision, cardiac arrhythmia, and dizziness were uncommon. CONCLUSION: New evidence confirms small, but clinically uncertain, differences among monotherapies and also between combination and monotherapy, regardless of statistical significance. While drugs mainly differed in incidence of dry mouth or constipation, none provided improved efficacy without increased harms. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04022-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6795617/ /pubmed/31346670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04022-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hsu, Frances C.
Weeks, Chandler E.
Selph, Shelley S.
Blazina, Ian
Holmes, Rebecca S.
McDonagh, Marian S.
Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title_full Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title_fullStr Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title_short Updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
title_sort updating the evidence on drugs to treat overactive bladder: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04022-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hsufrancesc updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview
AT weekschandlere updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview
AT selphshelleys updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview
AT blazinaian updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview
AT holmesrebeccas updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview
AT mcdonaghmarians updatingtheevidenceondrugstotreatoveractivebladderasystematicreview