Cargando…

Tumour necrosis as assessed with (18)F-FDG PET is a potential prognostic marker in diffuse large B cell lymphoma independent of MYC rearrangements

OBJECTIVES: MYC gene rearrangements in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) result in high proliferation rates and are associated with a poor prognosis. Strong proliferation is associated with high metabolic demand and tumour necrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahle, Xaver U., Hovingh, Menno, Noordzij, Walter, Seitz, Annika, Diepstra, Arjan, Visser, Lydia, van den Berg, Anke, van Meerten, Tom, Huls, Gerwin, Boellaard, Ronald, Kwee, Thomas C., Nijland, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31028445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06178-9
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: MYC gene rearrangements in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) result in high proliferation rates and are associated with a poor prognosis. Strong proliferation is associated with high metabolic demand and tumour necrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the presence of necrosis and semiquantitative (18)F-FDG PET metrics between DLBCL cases with or without a MYC rearrangement. The prognostic impact of necrosis and semiquantitative (18)F-FDG PET parameters was investigated in an explorative survival analysis. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis for MYC rearrangements, visual assesment, semiquantitative analysis of (18)F-FDG PET scans and patient survival analysis were performed in 61 DLBCL patients, treated at a single referral hospital between 2008 and 2015. RESULTS: Of 61 tumours, 21 (34%) had a MYC rearrangement (MYC(+)). MYC status was neither associated with the presence of necrosis on (18)F-FDG PET scans (necrosis(PET); p = 1.0) nor associated with the investigated semiquantitative parameters maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max); p = 0.43), single highest SUV(max) (p = 0.49), metabolic active tumour volume (MATV; p = 0.68) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG; p = 0.62). A multivariate patient survival analysis of the entire cohort showed necrosis(PET) as an independent prognostic marker for disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR = 13.9; 95% CI 3.0–65; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MYC rearrangements in DLBCL have no influence on the visual parameter necrosis(PET) or the semi-quantiative parameters SUV(max), MATV and TLG. Irrespective of MYC rearrangements, necrosis(PET) is an independent, adverse prognostic factor for DSS. KEY POINTS: • Retrospective analysis indicates that MYC rearrangement is not associated with necrosis on (18) F-FDG PET (necrosis (PET) ) scans or semiquantitative (18) F-FDG PET parameters. • Necrosis (PET) is a potential independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-specific survival in patients with DLBCL and is not influenced by the presence of MYC rearrangements. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06178-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.