Cargando…

Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paireder, Matthias, Kristo, Ivan, Asari, Reza, Jomrich, Gerd, Steindl, Johanns, Rieder, Erwin, Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06649-y
_version_ 1783459483475771392
author Paireder, Matthias
Kristo, Ivan
Asari, Reza
Jomrich, Gerd
Steindl, Johanns
Rieder, Erwin
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
author_facet Paireder, Matthias
Kristo, Ivan
Asari, Reza
Jomrich, Gerd
Steindl, Johanns
Rieder, Erwin
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
author_sort Paireder, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia after LF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrical lower esophageal sphincter stimulation in patients with IEM and GERD. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label single center study. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD and ineffective esophageal motility were included for lower esophageal sphincter electrical stimulation (LES-EST). Patients underwent prospective follow-up including physical examination, interrogation of the device and were surveyed for changes in the health-related quality of life score. RESULTS: According to power analysis, 17 patients were included in this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) was 64 mmHg s cm (quartiles 11.5–301). Median total % pH < 4 was 8.9 (quartiles 4–21.6). Twelve patients (70.6%) underwent additional hiatal repair. At 1-month follow-up, none of the patients showed any clinical or radiological signs of dysphagia. There were no procedure related severe adverse events. Mean total HQRL improved from baseline 37.53 (SD 15.07) to 10.93 (SD 9.18) at follow-up (FUP) (mean difference 24.0 CI 15.93–32.07) p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: LES-EST was introduced as a potential technique to avoid side effects of LF. LES-EST significantly improved health related quality of life and does not impair swallowing in patients with GERD and ineffective esophageal motility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6795634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67956342019-10-25 Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study Paireder, Matthias Kristo, Ivan Asari, Reza Jomrich, Gerd Steindl, Johanns Rieder, Erwin Schoppmann, Sebastian F. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia after LF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrical lower esophageal sphincter stimulation in patients with IEM and GERD. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label single center study. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD and ineffective esophageal motility were included for lower esophageal sphincter electrical stimulation (LES-EST). Patients underwent prospective follow-up including physical examination, interrogation of the device and were surveyed for changes in the health-related quality of life score. RESULTS: According to power analysis, 17 patients were included in this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) was 64 mmHg s cm (quartiles 11.5–301). Median total % pH < 4 was 8.9 (quartiles 4–21.6). Twelve patients (70.6%) underwent additional hiatal repair. At 1-month follow-up, none of the patients showed any clinical or radiological signs of dysphagia. There were no procedure related severe adverse events. Mean total HQRL improved from baseline 37.53 (SD 15.07) to 10.93 (SD 9.18) at follow-up (FUP) (mean difference 24.0 CI 15.93–32.07) p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: LES-EST was introduced as a potential technique to avoid side effects of LF. LES-EST significantly improved health related quality of life and does not impair swallowing in patients with GERD and ineffective esophageal motility. Springer US 2019-01-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6795634/ /pubmed/30671665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06649-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Paireder, Matthias
Kristo, Ivan
Asari, Reza
Jomrich, Gerd
Steindl, Johanns
Rieder, Erwin
Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title_full Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title_fullStr Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title_full_unstemmed Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title_short Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
title_sort electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with gerd and severe ineffective esophageal motility—a safety and efficacy study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06649-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pairedermatthias electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT kristoivan electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT asarireza electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT jomrichgerd electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT steindljohanns electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT riedererwin electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy
AT schoppmannsebastianf electricalloweresophagealsphincteraugmentationinpatientswithgerdandsevereineffectiveesophagealmotilityasafetyandefficacystudy