Cargando…

Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to validate the eoSim, an affordable and mobile inanimate laparoscopic simulator with instrument tracking capabilities, regarding face, content and construct validity on complex suturing tasks. METHODS: Participants recruited for this study were novices (no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leijte, Erik, Arts, Elke, Witteman, Bart, Jakimowicz, Jack, De Blaauw, Ivo, Botden, Sanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06652-3
_version_ 1783459483820752896
author Leijte, Erik
Arts, Elke
Witteman, Bart
Jakimowicz, Jack
De Blaauw, Ivo
Botden, Sanne
author_facet Leijte, Erik
Arts, Elke
Witteman, Bart
Jakimowicz, Jack
De Blaauw, Ivo
Botden, Sanne
author_sort Leijte, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to validate the eoSim, an affordable and mobile inanimate laparoscopic simulator with instrument tracking capabilities, regarding face, content and construct validity on complex suturing tasks. METHODS: Participants recruited for this study were novices (no laparoscopic experience), target group for this training (surgical/gynaecologic/urologic residents, > 10 basic and < 20 advanced laparoscopic procedures) and experts (> 20 advanced laparoscopic procedures). Each participant performed the intracorporeal suturing exercise (Task 1), an upside down needle transfer (Task 2, developed for this study) and an anastomosis needle transfer (Task 3). Following, the participants completed a questionnaire regarding their demographics and opinion on the eoSim in terms of realism, didactic value and usability. Measured outcome parameters were time, distance, percentage of instrument tip off-screen, working area, speed, acceleration and smoothness. RESULTS: In total, 104 participants completed the study, of which 60 novices, 31 residents and 13 experts. Face and content validity results showed a mean positive opinion on realism (3.9 Task 1, 3.6 Task 2 and 3.7 Task 3), didactic value (4.0, 3.4 and 3.7, respectively) and usability (4.2. 3.7 and 4.0, respectively). There were no significant differences in these outcomes between the specified expertise groups. Construct validity results showed significant differences between experts, target group or novices for Task 1 in terms of time (means 339, 607 and 1224 s, respectively, p < 0.001) and distance (means 8.1, 15.6 and 21.7 m, respectively, p < 0.001). Task 2 showed significant differences between groups regarding time (p < 0.001), distance (p 0.003), off-screen (p < 0.001) and working area (p < 0.001). Task 3 showed significant differences between groups, after subanalyses, on total number of stitches (p < 0.001), time per stitch (p < 0.001) and distance per stitch (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the eoSim is a potential meaningful and valuable simulator in the training of suturing tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6795635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67956352019-10-25 Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks Leijte, Erik Arts, Elke Witteman, Bart Jakimowicz, Jack De Blaauw, Ivo Botden, Sanne Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to validate the eoSim, an affordable and mobile inanimate laparoscopic simulator with instrument tracking capabilities, regarding face, content and construct validity on complex suturing tasks. METHODS: Participants recruited for this study were novices (no laparoscopic experience), target group for this training (surgical/gynaecologic/urologic residents, > 10 basic and < 20 advanced laparoscopic procedures) and experts (> 20 advanced laparoscopic procedures). Each participant performed the intracorporeal suturing exercise (Task 1), an upside down needle transfer (Task 2, developed for this study) and an anastomosis needle transfer (Task 3). Following, the participants completed a questionnaire regarding their demographics and opinion on the eoSim in terms of realism, didactic value and usability. Measured outcome parameters were time, distance, percentage of instrument tip off-screen, working area, speed, acceleration and smoothness. RESULTS: In total, 104 participants completed the study, of which 60 novices, 31 residents and 13 experts. Face and content validity results showed a mean positive opinion on realism (3.9 Task 1, 3.6 Task 2 and 3.7 Task 3), didactic value (4.0, 3.4 and 3.7, respectively) and usability (4.2. 3.7 and 4.0, respectively). There were no significant differences in these outcomes between the specified expertise groups. Construct validity results showed significant differences between experts, target group or novices for Task 1 in terms of time (means 339, 607 and 1224 s, respectively, p < 0.001) and distance (means 8.1, 15.6 and 21.7 m, respectively, p < 0.001). Task 2 showed significant differences between groups regarding time (p < 0.001), distance (p 0.003), off-screen (p < 0.001) and working area (p < 0.001). Task 3 showed significant differences between groups, after subanalyses, on total number of stitches (p < 0.001), time per stitch (p < 0.001) and distance per stitch (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the eoSim is a potential meaningful and valuable simulator in the training of suturing tasks. Springer US 2019-01-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6795635/ /pubmed/30671668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06652-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Leijte, Erik
Arts, Elke
Witteman, Bart
Jakimowicz, Jack
De Blaauw, Ivo
Botden, Sanne
Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title_full Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title_fullStr Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title_full_unstemmed Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title_short Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
title_sort construct, content and face validity of the eosim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06652-3
work_keys_str_mv AT leijteerik constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks
AT artselke constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks
AT wittemanbart constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks
AT jakimowiczjack constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks
AT deblaauwivo constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks
AT botdensanne constructcontentandfacevalidityoftheeosimlaparoscopicsimulatoronadvancedsuturingtasks