Cargando…
Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2 |
_version_ | 1783459561789718528 |
---|---|
author | Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. van der Ende, Arie Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. de Melker, Hester E. Knol, Mirjam J. |
author_facet | Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. van der Ende, Arie Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. de Melker, Hester E. Knol, Mirjam J. |
author_sort | Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decision making. Our objective was to describe the system and evaluate it for data completeness and timeliness. METHODS: Cases reported in the surveillance system from 2004 to 2016 were included. For the notification data, we used information on serogroup, vaccination status, mortality, and country of infection as indicators for record completeness. Notification times to regional and national level were calculated using the reported dates available in the notification database. RESULTS: A total of 2123 cases were reported in the years 2004–2016, of which 1.968 (93%) were reported by the reference laboratory and 1.995 (94%) in the notification system. Of all cases, 1.840 cases (87%) were reported in both systems and could be linked. The serogroup was known in 86% of the notified cases, and was significantly higher (94%) in the years 2013–2016. Information on vaccination status, mortality and country of infection was available in 88, 99 and 97% of notified cases, respectively. Regional notification of cases occurred within one working day for 86% of cases and 98% were notified nationally within three days. CONCLUSIONS: A well performing IMD surveillance system was demonstrated and serogroup completeness has improved over the years. Underlining the need for reporting to both the clinical and laboratory surveillance system remains important to further improve the overall performance in supporting public health response and vaccination policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6796335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67963352019-10-21 Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. van der Ende, Arie Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. de Melker, Hester E. Knol, Mirjam J. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decision making. Our objective was to describe the system and evaluate it for data completeness and timeliness. METHODS: Cases reported in the surveillance system from 2004 to 2016 were included. For the notification data, we used information on serogroup, vaccination status, mortality, and country of infection as indicators for record completeness. Notification times to regional and national level were calculated using the reported dates available in the notification database. RESULTS: A total of 2123 cases were reported in the years 2004–2016, of which 1.968 (93%) were reported by the reference laboratory and 1.995 (94%) in the notification system. Of all cases, 1.840 cases (87%) were reported in both systems and could be linked. The serogroup was known in 86% of the notified cases, and was significantly higher (94%) in the years 2013–2016. Information on vaccination status, mortality and country of infection was available in 88, 99 and 97% of notified cases, respectively. Regional notification of cases occurred within one working day for 86% of cases and 98% were notified nationally within three days. CONCLUSIONS: A well performing IMD surveillance system was demonstrated and serogroup completeness has improved over the years. Underlining the need for reporting to both the clinical and laboratory surveillance system remains important to further improve the overall performance in supporting public health response and vaccination policy. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6796335/ /pubmed/31623567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. van der Ende, Arie Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. de Melker, Hester E. Knol, Mirjam J. Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title | Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title_full | Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title_short | Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 |
title_sort | evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (imd) in the netherlands, 2004–2016 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandwagtdiederikah evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016 AT vanderendearie evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016 AT ruijswilhelminalm evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016 AT demelkerhestere evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016 AT knolmirjamj evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016 |