Cargando…

Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016

BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandwagt, Diederik A. H., van der Ende, Arie, Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M., de Melker, Hester E., Knol, Mirjam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2
_version_ 1783459561789718528
author Brandwagt, Diederik A. H.
van der Ende, Arie
Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M.
de Melker, Hester E.
Knol, Mirjam J.
author_facet Brandwagt, Diederik A. H.
van der Ende, Arie
Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M.
de Melker, Hester E.
Knol, Mirjam J.
author_sort Brandwagt, Diederik A. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decision making. Our objective was to describe the system and evaluate it for data completeness and timeliness. METHODS: Cases reported in the surveillance system from 2004 to 2016 were included. For the notification data, we used information on serogroup, vaccination status, mortality, and country of infection as indicators for record completeness. Notification times to regional and national level were calculated using the reported dates available in the notification database. RESULTS: A total of 2123 cases were reported in the years 2004–2016, of which 1.968 (93%) were reported by the reference laboratory and 1.995 (94%) in the notification system. Of all cases, 1.840 cases (87%) were reported in both systems and could be linked. The serogroup was known in 86% of the notified cases, and was significantly higher (94%) in the years 2013–2016. Information on vaccination status, mortality and country of infection was available in 88, 99 and 97% of notified cases, respectively. Regional notification of cases occurred within one working day for 86% of cases and 98% were notified nationally within three days. CONCLUSIONS: A well performing IMD surveillance system was demonstrated and serogroup completeness has improved over the years. Underlining the need for reporting to both the clinical and laboratory surveillance system remains important to further improve the overall performance in supporting public health response and vaccination policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6796335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67963352019-10-21 Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016 Brandwagt, Diederik A. H. van der Ende, Arie Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. de Melker, Hester E. Knol, Mirjam J. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced surveillance for confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was introduced in the Netherlands in 2003, in which reference laboratory data (NRLBM) are linked with notification data (OSIRIS). The quality of surveillance information is important for public health decision making. Our objective was to describe the system and evaluate it for data completeness and timeliness. METHODS: Cases reported in the surveillance system from 2004 to 2016 were included. For the notification data, we used information on serogroup, vaccination status, mortality, and country of infection as indicators for record completeness. Notification times to regional and national level were calculated using the reported dates available in the notification database. RESULTS: A total of 2123 cases were reported in the years 2004–2016, of which 1.968 (93%) were reported by the reference laboratory and 1.995 (94%) in the notification system. Of all cases, 1.840 cases (87%) were reported in both systems and could be linked. The serogroup was known in 86% of the notified cases, and was significantly higher (94%) in the years 2013–2016. Information on vaccination status, mortality and country of infection was available in 88, 99 and 97% of notified cases, respectively. Regional notification of cases occurred within one working day for 86% of cases and 98% were notified nationally within three days. CONCLUSIONS: A well performing IMD surveillance system was demonstrated and serogroup completeness has improved over the years. Underlining the need for reporting to both the clinical and laboratory surveillance system remains important to further improve the overall performance in supporting public health response and vaccination policy. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6796335/ /pubmed/31623567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brandwagt, Diederik A. H.
van der Ende, Arie
Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M.
de Melker, Hester E.
Knol, Mirjam J.
Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title_full Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title_fullStr Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title_short Evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the Netherlands, 2004–2016
title_sort evaluation of the surveillance system for invasive meningococcal disease (imd) in the netherlands, 2004–2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4513-2
work_keys_str_mv AT brandwagtdiederikah evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016
AT vanderendearie evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016
AT ruijswilhelminalm evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016
AT demelkerhestere evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016
AT knolmirjamj evaluationofthesurveillancesystemforinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseimdinthenetherlands20042016