Cargando…

Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi

BACKGROUND: Within the last years, numerous reports described successful application of the CRISPR nucleases Cas9 and Cpf1 for genome editing in filamentous fungi. However, still a lot of efforts are invested to develop and improve protocols for the fungus and genes of interest with respect to appli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Min Jin, Schütze, Tabea, Spohner, Sebastian, Haefner, Stefan, Meyer, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0079-4
_version_ 1783459601686986752
author Kwon, Min Jin
Schütze, Tabea
Spohner, Sebastian
Haefner, Stefan
Meyer, Vera
author_facet Kwon, Min Jin
Schütze, Tabea
Spohner, Sebastian
Haefner, Stefan
Meyer, Vera
author_sort Kwon, Min Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the last years, numerous reports described successful application of the CRISPR nucleases Cas9 and Cpf1 for genome editing in filamentous fungi. However, still a lot of efforts are invested to develop and improve protocols for the fungus and genes of interest with respect to applicability, scalability and targeting efficiencies. These efforts are often hampered by the fact that—although many different protocols are available—none have systematically analysed and compared different CRISPR nucleases and different application procedures thereof for the efficiency of single- and multiplex-targeting approaches in the same fungus. RESULTS: We present here data for successful genome editing in the cell factory Thermothelomyces thermophilus, formerly known as Myceliophthora thermophila, using the three different nucleases SpCas9, FnCpf1, AsCpf1 guided to four different gene targets of our interest. These included a polyketide synthase (pks4.2), an alkaline protease (alp1), a SNARE protein (snc1) and a potential transcription factor (ptf1). For all four genes, guide RNAs were developed which enabled successful single-targeting and multiplex-targeting. CRISPR nucleases were either delivered to T. thermophilus on plasmids or preassembled with in vitro transcribed gRNA to form ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). We also evaluated the efficiency of single oligonucleotides for site-directed mutagenesis. Finally, we were able to scale down the transformation protocol to microtiter plate format which generated high numbers of positive transformants and will thus pave the way for future high-throughput investigations. CONCLUSION: We provide here the first comprehensive analysis and evaluation of different CRISPR approaches for a filamentous fungus. All approaches followed enabled successful genome editing in T. thermophilus; however, with different success rates. In addition, we show that the success rate depends on the respective nuclease and on the targeted gene locus. We finally present a practical guidance for experimental considerations aiming to guide the reader for successful implementation of CRISPR technology for other fungi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6796461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67964612019-10-22 Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi Kwon, Min Jin Schütze, Tabea Spohner, Sebastian Haefner, Stefan Meyer, Vera Fungal Biol Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Within the last years, numerous reports described successful application of the CRISPR nucleases Cas9 and Cpf1 for genome editing in filamentous fungi. However, still a lot of efforts are invested to develop and improve protocols for the fungus and genes of interest with respect to applicability, scalability and targeting efficiencies. These efforts are often hampered by the fact that—although many different protocols are available—none have systematically analysed and compared different CRISPR nucleases and different application procedures thereof for the efficiency of single- and multiplex-targeting approaches in the same fungus. RESULTS: We present here data for successful genome editing in the cell factory Thermothelomyces thermophilus, formerly known as Myceliophthora thermophila, using the three different nucleases SpCas9, FnCpf1, AsCpf1 guided to four different gene targets of our interest. These included a polyketide synthase (pks4.2), an alkaline protease (alp1), a SNARE protein (snc1) and a potential transcription factor (ptf1). For all four genes, guide RNAs were developed which enabled successful single-targeting and multiplex-targeting. CRISPR nucleases were either delivered to T. thermophilus on plasmids or preassembled with in vitro transcribed gRNA to form ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). We also evaluated the efficiency of single oligonucleotides for site-directed mutagenesis. Finally, we were able to scale down the transformation protocol to microtiter plate format which generated high numbers of positive transformants and will thus pave the way for future high-throughput investigations. CONCLUSION: We provide here the first comprehensive analysis and evaluation of different CRISPR approaches for a filamentous fungus. All approaches followed enabled successful genome editing in T. thermophilus; however, with different success rates. In addition, we show that the success rate depends on the respective nuclease and on the targeted gene locus. We finally present a practical guidance for experimental considerations aiming to guide the reader for successful implementation of CRISPR technology for other fungi. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6796461/ /pubmed/31641526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0079-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kwon, Min Jin
Schütze, Tabea
Spohner, Sebastian
Haefner, Stefan
Meyer, Vera
Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title_full Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title_fullStr Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title_full_unstemmed Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title_short Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
title_sort practical guidance for the implementation of the crispr genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0079-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonminjin practicalguidancefortheimplementationofthecrisprgenomeeditingtoolinfilamentousfungi
AT schutzetabea practicalguidancefortheimplementationofthecrisprgenomeeditingtoolinfilamentousfungi
AT spohnersebastian practicalguidancefortheimplementationofthecrisprgenomeeditingtoolinfilamentousfungi
AT haefnerstefan practicalguidancefortheimplementationofthecrisprgenomeeditingtoolinfilamentousfungi
AT meyervera practicalguidancefortheimplementationofthecrisprgenomeeditingtoolinfilamentousfungi