Cargando…

Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The induction of labour is an increasingly common procedure in the obstetrics field. Various methods have been used to induce labour, among which balloon catheters play an important role. Whether the specifically designed double-balloon catheter is better than the single-balloon device i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Liu, Xiyao, Wang, Yu, Zhang, Fan, Zhong, Xiaoni, Ou, Rong, Luo, Xin, Qi, Hongbo
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2491-4

Ejemplares similares

Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review
por: Sangram Singh, Biswambhar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Double Balloon Cervical Ripening Catheter for Control of Massive Hemorrhage in a Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy
por: Zambrano, Nabila, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
por: Flament, Emeline, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction of an effective cervical ripenning in the induction of labour using vaginal dinoprostone
por: López Jiménez, Nuria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
por: De Bonrostro Torralba, Carlos, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Recombinant human relaxin versus placebo for cervical ripening: a double-blind randomised trial in pregnant women scheduled for induction of labour
por: Weiss, Gerson, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Zhu, Lixia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients
por: Yan, Jinjing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial
por: Diguisto, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
por: Bhide, Amarnath, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h
por: Peng, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Zhao, Ge, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of Cesarean Delivery after Vaginal Inserts with Prostaglandin Analogs and Single-Balloon Catheter Used for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
por: Strößner, Lena, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial
por: M, Kanagavarshani, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery
por: Choo, Soe-Na, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Double balloon catheters: A promising tool for induction of labor in multiparous women with unfavorable cervices
por: Tülek, Fırat, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
por: Wen, Chaoyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
por: Wilkinson, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies
por: Diguisto, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study
por: Shindo, Ryosuke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
por: Wise, Michelle R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas—A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Lauterbach, Roy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A snapshot of women’s and clinicians’ perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor
por: Waldron, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
por: Shalev-Ram, Hila, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Methods for assessing pre‐induction cervical ripening
por: Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu U, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: A retrospective observational cohort study
por: Kruit, Heidi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

CERVICAL RIPENING BALLOON AS A METHOD OF PREINDUCTION – ONE CENTER STUDY
por: Košec, Vesna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
por: De Berti, Marion, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section
por: Boisen, Anne B., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour
por: Smith, James Andrew
Publicado: (2013)

Patient Pain and Satisfaction With 10, 30, and 70 mL Transcervical Foley Balloons for Cervical Ripening During Induction of Labor
por: Dombrovsky, Inessa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Extended balloon labour induction: A single arm proof of concept trial
por: Matshitsa, Lorato, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of labour in case of premature rupture of membranes at term with an unfavourable cervix: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing double balloon catheter (+oxytocin) and vaginal prostaglandin (RUBAPRO) treatments
por: Devillard, Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outpatient Induction of Labor – Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?
por: Rath, Werner, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fp7uactm5k0v6la63bstqfk1h3