Cargando…

Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been widely used for orthopedic surgeries including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to clarify the usefulness of subcutaneous PCA in the early phase after TKA. METHODS: Our subjects consisted of 88 osteoarthritis knee patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakagawa, Yusuke, Watanabe, Toshifumi, Amano, Yusuke, Horie, Masafumi, Nakamura, Tomomasa, Otabe, Koji, Katakura, Mai, Sekiya, Ichiro, Muneta, Takeshi, Koga, Hideyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2019.09.001
_version_ 1783459630873051136
author Nakagawa, Yusuke
Watanabe, Toshifumi
Amano, Yusuke
Horie, Masafumi
Nakamura, Tomomasa
Otabe, Koji
Katakura, Mai
Sekiya, Ichiro
Muneta, Takeshi
Koga, Hideyuki
author_facet Nakagawa, Yusuke
Watanabe, Toshifumi
Amano, Yusuke
Horie, Masafumi
Nakamura, Tomomasa
Otabe, Koji
Katakura, Mai
Sekiya, Ichiro
Muneta, Takeshi
Koga, Hideyuki
author_sort Nakagawa, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been widely used for orthopedic surgeries including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to clarify the usefulness of subcutaneous PCA in the early phase after TKA. METHODS: Our subjects consisted of 88 osteoarthritis knee patients who underwent primary TKA, and were classified into two groups: 42 patients received a subcutaneous PCA (containing fentanyl and droleptan) after operation (PCA group), and 46 patients were managed without a subcutaneous PCA (control group). We compared the incidence of side effects for 3 days postoperatively, measuring the number of times patients used adjuvant analgesia and range of motion on day 7 between the two groups. 34 of 42 patients in the PCA group tolerated PCA use until POD 3 (continuation sub-group), while 8 patients could not continue PCA (interruption sub-group). Demographic data of the two sub-groups were compared. RESULTS: The mean number of times adjunctive analgesics were used by the PCA group (3.7 ± 2.2) was significantly less than in the control group (5.4 ± 2.8) (p = 0.0049). There were no significant differences in the frequency of side effects between the two groups. There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two groups. Comparing the continuation and interruption sub-groups, patients over 80 years old were at risk to discontinue a subcutaneous PCA (p = 0.0319, odds ratio 5.4). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that subcutaneous PCA would be a safe postoperative pain regimen for TKA patients, but the effect was not enough to promote early functional recovery. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level Ⅱ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6796556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67965562019-10-22 Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty Nakagawa, Yusuke Watanabe, Toshifumi Amano, Yusuke Horie, Masafumi Nakamura, Tomomasa Otabe, Koji Katakura, Mai Sekiya, Ichiro Muneta, Takeshi Koga, Hideyuki Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Original Article PURPOSE: Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been widely used for orthopedic surgeries including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to clarify the usefulness of subcutaneous PCA in the early phase after TKA. METHODS: Our subjects consisted of 88 osteoarthritis knee patients who underwent primary TKA, and were classified into two groups: 42 patients received a subcutaneous PCA (containing fentanyl and droleptan) after operation (PCA group), and 46 patients were managed without a subcutaneous PCA (control group). We compared the incidence of side effects for 3 days postoperatively, measuring the number of times patients used adjuvant analgesia and range of motion on day 7 between the two groups. 34 of 42 patients in the PCA group tolerated PCA use until POD 3 (continuation sub-group), while 8 patients could not continue PCA (interruption sub-group). Demographic data of the two sub-groups were compared. RESULTS: The mean number of times adjunctive analgesics were used by the PCA group (3.7 ± 2.2) was significantly less than in the control group (5.4 ± 2.8) (p = 0.0049). There were no significant differences in the frequency of side effects between the two groups. There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two groups. Comparing the continuation and interruption sub-groups, patients over 80 years old were at risk to discontinue a subcutaneous PCA (p = 0.0319, odds ratio 5.4). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that subcutaneous PCA would be a safe postoperative pain regimen for TKA patients, but the effect was not enough to promote early functional recovery. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level Ⅱ. Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6796556/ /pubmed/31641618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2019.09.001 Text en © 2019 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nakagawa, Yusuke
Watanabe, Toshifumi
Amano, Yusuke
Horie, Masafumi
Nakamura, Tomomasa
Otabe, Koji
Katakura, Mai
Sekiya, Ichiro
Muneta, Takeshi
Koga, Hideyuki
Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title_full Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title_short Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
title_sort benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2019.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT nakagawayusuke benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT watanabetoshifumi benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT amanoyusuke benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT horiemasafumi benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT nakamuratomomasa benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT otabekoji benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT katakuramai benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT sekiyaichiro benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT munetatakeshi benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT kogahideyuki benefitofsubcutaneouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaaftertotalkneearthroplasty