Cargando…

Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis

BACKGROUND: Several novel immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments exhibited promising survival benefits for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), yet there is no current guidance regarding the optimum first-line regimen. We performed this network analysis to compare the efficacy and saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Junpeng, Li, Xin, Wu, Xiaoqiang, Wang, Zhiwei, Zhang, Chan, Cao, Guanghui, Zhang, Xiaofan, Peng, Feng, Yan, Tianzhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31439476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.006
_version_ 1783459636646510592
author Wang, Junpeng
Li, Xin
Wu, Xiaoqiang
Wang, Zhiwei
Zhang, Chan
Cao, Guanghui
Zhang, Xiaofan
Peng, Feng
Yan, Tianzhong
author_facet Wang, Junpeng
Li, Xin
Wu, Xiaoqiang
Wang, Zhiwei
Zhang, Chan
Cao, Guanghui
Zhang, Xiaofan
Peng, Feng
Yan, Tianzhong
author_sort Wang, Junpeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several novel immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments exhibited promising survival benefits for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), yet there is no current guidance regarding the optimum first-line regimen. We performed this network analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of all available treatments for mRCC. METHODS: A systematic search of literature was conducted up to April 30, 2019, and the analysis was done on a Bayesian fixed-effect model. FINDINGS: Twenty-five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 13,010 patients were included in this study. The results showed that for overall survival, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.38–0.73) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR: 0.63; 95% CrI: 0.50–0.79) were significantly more effective than sunitinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib was probably (68%) to be the best choice. For progression-free survival, cabozantinib (HR: 0.66; 95% CrI: 0.46–0.94), pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR: 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.57–0.84), avelumab plus axitinib (HR: 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.56–0.85), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR: 0.82; 95% CrI: 0.68–0.99), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (HR: 0.86; 95% CrI: 0.74–0.99) were statistically superior to sunitinib, and cabozantinib was likely (43%) to be the preferred options. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (OR: 0.50; 95% CrI: 0.28–0.84), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (OR: 0.56; 95% CrI: 0.36–0.83) were associated with significantly lower rate of high-grade adverse events than sunitinib. INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab plus axitinib might be the best treatment for mRCC, while nivolumab plus ipilimumab has the most favorable balance between efficacy and acceptability, and may provide new guidance to make treatment decisions. FUND: This research was supported by the Henan Provincial Scientific and Technological Research Project (Grant No. 192102310036).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6796578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67965782019-10-22 Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis Wang, Junpeng Li, Xin Wu, Xiaoqiang Wang, Zhiwei Zhang, Chan Cao, Guanghui Zhang, Xiaofan Peng, Feng Yan, Tianzhong EBioMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: Several novel immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments exhibited promising survival benefits for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), yet there is no current guidance regarding the optimum first-line regimen. We performed this network analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of all available treatments for mRCC. METHODS: A systematic search of literature was conducted up to April 30, 2019, and the analysis was done on a Bayesian fixed-effect model. FINDINGS: Twenty-five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 13,010 patients were included in this study. The results showed that for overall survival, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.38–0.73) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR: 0.63; 95% CrI: 0.50–0.79) were significantly more effective than sunitinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib was probably (68%) to be the best choice. For progression-free survival, cabozantinib (HR: 0.66; 95% CrI: 0.46–0.94), pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR: 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.57–0.84), avelumab plus axitinib (HR: 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.56–0.85), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR: 0.82; 95% CrI: 0.68–0.99), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (HR: 0.86; 95% CrI: 0.74–0.99) were statistically superior to sunitinib, and cabozantinib was likely (43%) to be the preferred options. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (OR: 0.50; 95% CrI: 0.28–0.84), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (OR: 0.56; 95% CrI: 0.36–0.83) were associated with significantly lower rate of high-grade adverse events than sunitinib. INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab plus axitinib might be the best treatment for mRCC, while nivolumab plus ipilimumab has the most favorable balance between efficacy and acceptability, and may provide new guidance to make treatment decisions. FUND: This research was supported by the Henan Provincial Scientific and Technological Research Project (Grant No. 192102310036). Elsevier 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6796578/ /pubmed/31439476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.006 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Wang, Junpeng
Li, Xin
Wu, Xiaoqiang
Wang, Zhiwei
Zhang, Chan
Cao, Guanghui
Zhang, Xiaofan
Peng, Feng
Yan, Tianzhong
Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title_full Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title_fullStr Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title_short Role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: A Bayesian network analysis
title_sort role of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a bayesian network analysis
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31439476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.006
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjunpeng roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT lixin roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT wuxiaoqiang roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT wangzhiwei roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT zhangchan roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT caoguanghui roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT zhangxiaofan roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT pengfeng roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT yantianzhong roleofimmunecheckpointinhibitorbasedtherapiesformetastaticrenalcellcarcinomainthefirstlinesettingabayesiannetworkanalysis