The effect of test modality on dynamic exercise biomarkers in children, adolescents, and young adults

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) modalities, treadmill (TM), and cycle ergometer (CE), influence maximal gas exchange and heart rate (HR) responses. Little is known regarding CPET modality effect on submaximal biomarkers during childhood and adolescence. Ninety‐four healthy participants (7–34 y.o., 53% female) performed TM and CE CPET to address two major gaps: (1) the effect of modality on submaximal CPET biomarkers, and (2) estimation of work rate in TM CPET. Breath‐by‐breath gas exchange enabled calculation of linear regression slopes such as [Formula: see text] O(2)/ΔHR and Δ [Formula: see text] E/Δ [Formula: see text] CO(2). Lean body mass (LBM) was measured with dual X‐ray absorptiometry. We tested a novel TM CPET estimate of work rate based on TM velocity(2), incline, and body mass (VIM). Like the linear relationship between [Formula: see text] O(2) and work rate in CE CPET, [Formula: see text] O(2) increased linearly with TM VIM. TM Δ [Formula: see text] O(2)/ΔHR was highly correlated with CE (r = 0.92), and each increased substantially with LBM (P < 0.0001 for TM and CE). Δ [Formula: see text] O(2)/ΔHR was to a small (~8.7%) but significant extent larger in TM (1.6 mL/min/beat, P = 0.04). In contrast, TM and CE Δ [Formula: see text] E/Δ [Formula: see text] CO(2) decreased significantly with LBM, supporting earlier observations from CE CPET. For both CE and TM, males had significantly higher Δ [Formula: see text] O(2)/ΔHR but lower Δ [Formula: see text] E/Δ [Formula: see text] CO(2) than females. Novel TM CPET biomarkers such as ΔVIM/ΔHR and ∆ [Formula: see text] O(2)/ΔVIM paralleled effects of LBM observed in CE CPET. TM and CE CPET submaximal biomarkers are not interchangeable, but similarly reflect maturation during critical periods. CPET analysis that utilizes data actually measured (rather than estimated) may improve the clinical value of TM and CE CPET.