Cargando…
Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Org...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632874 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422 |
_version_ | 1783459731383255040 |
---|---|
author | Nasir, Zafar Mahmood, Tariq Adel, Hatem Nausheen, Sadaf Hamid, Samar Sattar, Amjad Manohar, Murli |
author_facet | Nasir, Zafar Mahmood, Tariq Adel, Hatem Nausheen, Sadaf Hamid, Samar Sattar, Amjad Manohar, Murli |
author_sort | Nasir, Zafar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST criteria for treatment response evaluation in patients with solid malignant tumors. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study conducted from February 2017 till July 2017. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors were searched. Experienced radiologists evaluated the PET-CT images based on EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The Kappa (κ) test was used for evaluation of agreement between treatment response according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. Results Out of 54 patients, 41 (75.9%) were male and 13 (24.1%) were female with a mean age of 57.09 ± 10.65 years. According to EORTC criteria, complete metabolic response (CMR) was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, partial metabolic response (PMR) was seen in 36 (66.7%) of patients, progressive metabolic disease (PMD) was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and stable metabolic disease (SMD) was seen in four (7.4%) of patients. According to PERCIST criteria, CMR was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, PMR was seen in 33 (61.1%) of patients, PMD was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and SMD was seen in seven (13.0%) of patients. EORTC and PERCIST agreed on 43 (79.6%) of the patients with κ-coefficient of 0.62 indicating good agreement (p-value of <0.001). Conclusion EORTC and PERCIST criteria have a good agreement in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors. Therefore, adoption of EORTC or PERCIST in PET-CT reporting can standardize the evaluation of oncological treatment results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67970092019-10-20 Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors Nasir, Zafar Mahmood, Tariq Adel, Hatem Nausheen, Sadaf Hamid, Samar Sattar, Amjad Manohar, Murli Cureus Radiology Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST criteria for treatment response evaluation in patients with solid malignant tumors. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study conducted from February 2017 till July 2017. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors were searched. Experienced radiologists evaluated the PET-CT images based on EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The Kappa (κ) test was used for evaluation of agreement between treatment response according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. Results Out of 54 patients, 41 (75.9%) were male and 13 (24.1%) were female with a mean age of 57.09 ± 10.65 years. According to EORTC criteria, complete metabolic response (CMR) was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, partial metabolic response (PMR) was seen in 36 (66.7%) of patients, progressive metabolic disease (PMD) was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and stable metabolic disease (SMD) was seen in four (7.4%) of patients. According to PERCIST criteria, CMR was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, PMR was seen in 33 (61.1%) of patients, PMD was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and SMD was seen in seven (13.0%) of patients. EORTC and PERCIST agreed on 43 (79.6%) of the patients with κ-coefficient of 0.62 indicating good agreement (p-value of <0.001). Conclusion EORTC and PERCIST criteria have a good agreement in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors. Therefore, adoption of EORTC or PERCIST in PET-CT reporting can standardize the evaluation of oncological treatment results. Cureus 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6797009/ /pubmed/31632874 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422 Text en Copyright © 2019, Nasir et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Nasir, Zafar Mahmood, Tariq Adel, Hatem Nausheen, Sadaf Hamid, Samar Sattar, Amjad Manohar, Murli Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title | Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title_full | Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title_fullStr | Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title_short | Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors |
title_sort | agreement between the european organization for research and treatment of cancer and positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632874 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nasirzafar agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT mahmoodtariq agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT adelhatem agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT nausheensadaf agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT hamidsamar agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT sattaramjad agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors AT manoharmurli agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors |