Cargando…

Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors

Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Org...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasir, Zafar, Mahmood, Tariq, Adel, Hatem, Nausheen, Sadaf, Hamid, Samar, Sattar, Amjad, Manohar, Murli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632874
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422
_version_ 1783459731383255040
author Nasir, Zafar
Mahmood, Tariq
Adel, Hatem
Nausheen, Sadaf
Hamid, Samar
Sattar, Amjad
Manohar, Murli
author_facet Nasir, Zafar
Mahmood, Tariq
Adel, Hatem
Nausheen, Sadaf
Hamid, Samar
Sattar, Amjad
Manohar, Murli
author_sort Nasir, Zafar
collection PubMed
description Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST criteria for treatment response evaluation in patients with solid malignant tumors. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study conducted from February 2017 till July 2017. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors were searched. Experienced radiologists evaluated the PET-CT images based on EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The Kappa (κ) test was used for evaluation of agreement between treatment response according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. Results Out of 54 patients, 41 (75.9%) were male and 13 (24.1%) were female with a mean age of 57.09 ± 10.65 years. According to EORTC criteria, complete metabolic response (CMR) was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, partial metabolic response (PMR) was seen in 36 (66.7%) of patients, progressive metabolic disease (PMD) was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and stable metabolic disease (SMD) was seen in four (7.4%) of patients. According to PERCIST criteria, CMR was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, PMR was seen in 33 (61.1%) of patients, PMD was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and SMD was seen in seven (13.0%) of patients. EORTC and PERCIST agreed on 43 (79.6%) of the patients with κ-coefficient of 0.62 indicating good agreement (p-value of <0.001). Conclusion EORTC and PERCIST criteria have a good agreement in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors. Therefore, adoption of EORTC or PERCIST in PET-CT reporting can standardize the evaluation of oncological treatment results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67970092019-10-20 Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors Nasir, Zafar Mahmood, Tariq Adel, Hatem Nausheen, Sadaf Hamid, Samar Sattar, Amjad Manohar, Murli Cureus Radiology Introduction Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is used for non-invasive staging and restaging of solid malignant tumors. PET-CT based criteria have been developed to evaluate the response to targeted therapy. These include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between EORTC and PERCIST criteria for treatment response evaluation in patients with solid malignant tumors. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study conducted from February 2017 till July 2017. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors were searched. Experienced radiologists evaluated the PET-CT images based on EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The Kappa (κ) test was used for evaluation of agreement between treatment response according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. Results Out of 54 patients, 41 (75.9%) were male and 13 (24.1%) were female with a mean age of 57.09 ± 10.65 years. According to EORTC criteria, complete metabolic response (CMR) was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, partial metabolic response (PMR) was seen in 36 (66.7%) of patients, progressive metabolic disease (PMD) was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and stable metabolic disease (SMD) was seen in four (7.4%) of patients. According to PERCIST criteria, CMR was seen in five (9.3%) of patients, PMR was seen in 33 (61.1%) of patients, PMD was seen in nine (16.7%) of patients and SMD was seen in seven (13.0%) of patients. EORTC and PERCIST agreed on 43 (79.6%) of the patients with κ-coefficient of 0.62 indicating good agreement (p-value of <0.001). Conclusion EORTC and PERCIST criteria have a good agreement in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors. Therefore, adoption of EORTC or PERCIST in PET-CT reporting can standardize the evaluation of oncological treatment results. Cureus 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6797009/ /pubmed/31632874 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422 Text en Copyright © 2019, Nasir et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Nasir, Zafar
Mahmood, Tariq
Adel, Hatem
Nausheen, Sadaf
Hamid, Samar
Sattar, Amjad
Manohar, Murli
Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title_full Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title_fullStr Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title_short Agreement Between the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors in Evaluating Treatment Response in Solid Malignant Tumors
title_sort agreement between the european organization for research and treatment of cancer and positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors in evaluating treatment response in solid malignant tumors
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632874
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5422
work_keys_str_mv AT nasirzafar agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT mahmoodtariq agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT adelhatem agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT nausheensadaf agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT hamidsamar agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT sattaramjad agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors
AT manoharmurli agreementbetweentheeuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerandpositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsolidtumorsinevaluatingtreatmentresponseinsolidmalignanttumors