Cargando…

Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the rate of spend on child and adolescent mental health is influenced by demand for other competing services in local commissioning decisions. DESIGN: Analysis of spend data by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), including other publicly available data to control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocks, Stephen, Fazel, Mina, Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030011
_version_ 1783459785924935680
author Rocks, Stephen
Fazel, Mina
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
author_facet Rocks, Stephen
Fazel, Mina
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
author_sort Rocks, Stephen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the rate of spend on child and adolescent mental health is influenced by demand for other competing services in local commissioning decisions. DESIGN: Analysis of spend data by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), including other publicly available data to control for variation in need. SETTING: Local commissioning decisions in the National Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Commissioning of health services across 209 CCGs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between the rate of child and adolescent mental health spend and demand for child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), adult mental health services and physical health services after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: An additional percentage point in the proportion of children in care is associated with 4% higher child and young person mental health (CYP MH) spend per person aged 0–18 (ratio of means: 1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07). Spending £100 more on physical health services was associated with 9% lower spend in CYP MH per person aged 0–18 (ratio of means: 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare commissioners in England face a challenge in balancing competing needs. This paper contributes to our understanding of this by quantifying the possible extent of the trade-off between physical health and CYP MH when allocating budgets. Any attempt to explain the variation in CAMHS spend must also take account of demand for other services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67972742019-10-31 Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study Rocks, Stephen Fazel, Mina Tsiachristas, Apostolos BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the rate of spend on child and adolescent mental health is influenced by demand for other competing services in local commissioning decisions. DESIGN: Analysis of spend data by Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG), including other publicly available data to control for variation in need. SETTING: Local commissioning decisions in the National Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Commissioning of health services across 209 CCGs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between the rate of child and adolescent mental health spend and demand for child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), adult mental health services and physical health services after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: An additional percentage point in the proportion of children in care is associated with 4% higher child and young person mental health (CYP MH) spend per person aged 0–18 (ratio of means: 1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07). Spending £100 more on physical health services was associated with 9% lower spend in CYP MH per person aged 0–18 (ratio of means: 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare commissioners in England face a challenge in balancing competing needs. This paper contributes to our understanding of this by quantifying the possible extent of the trade-off between physical health and CYP MH when allocating budgets. Any attempt to explain the variation in CAMHS spend must also take account of demand for other services. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6797274/ /pubmed/31594880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030011 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Rocks, Stephen
Fazel, Mina
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title_full Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title_fullStr Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title_full_unstemmed Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title_short Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study
title_sort variation in spend on young mental health across clinical commissioning groups in england: a cross-sectional observational study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030011
work_keys_str_mv AT rocksstephen variationinspendonyoungmentalhealthacrossclinicalcommissioninggroupsinenglandacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT fazelmina variationinspendonyoungmentalhealthacrossclinicalcommissioninggroupsinenglandacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT tsiachristasapostolos variationinspendonyoungmentalhealthacrossclinicalcommissioninggroupsinenglandacrosssectionalobservationalstudy