Cargando…
‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study
INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of children require having all, or part, of their nutritional intake via gastrostomy. More parents are using home-blended meals to feed their children, with many reporting beneficial effects such as improved gastro-oesophageal reflux, less constipation and less distr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033831 |
_version_ | 1783459790246117376 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Johanna O'Neill, Mark Maddison, Jane Richardson, Gerry Hewitt, Catherine Horridge, Karen Cade, Janet McCarter, Alison Beresford, Bryony Fraser, Lorna Katharine |
author_facet | Taylor, Johanna O'Neill, Mark Maddison, Jane Richardson, Gerry Hewitt, Catherine Horridge, Karen Cade, Janet McCarter, Alison Beresford, Bryony Fraser, Lorna Katharine |
author_sort | Taylor, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of children require having all, or part, of their nutritional intake via gastrostomy. More parents are using home-blended meals to feed their children, with many reporting beneficial effects such as improved gastro-oesophageal reflux, less constipation and less distress in their child. This study aims to identify the important outcomes of tube feeding in this population, compare the safety, outcomes and resource use of those on a home-blended diet compared with a formula diet and assess feasibility of long-term follow-up of children recruited to this study. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This is a mixed methods study of children (aged 6 months to 18 years) who are gastrostomy feed dependent recruited via general, community and specialist paediatric and dietetic services. Workstream 1 (WS1): a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with parents (n~20) and young people (n~5–10), and focus groups with health professionals (n~25), will provide evidence of appropriate outcome measures and the feasibility/acceptability of proposed data collection methods for WS2. It will gather data on: desired outcomes of gastrostomy feeding, variability in diets and reasons; use of oral feeding; perceived benefits of the alternative diets, resources associated with gastrostomy feeding and safety issues. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis. WS2: a cohort study of 300 children who are gastrostomy fed. Data will be collected at months 0, 9 and 18 from parents, children (if appropriate) and clinicians using standardised measures and questionnaires developed specifically for the study. Data collected will include gastrointestinal symptoms, health and other outcomes (child, parent), dietary intake, anthropometry, healthcare usage, safety outcomes and resource use. Outcomes in the home-blended and formula groups will be compared using appropriate multiple regression analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by a research ethics committee (REC reference: 19/YH/0028). Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations for professionals and families. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13977361. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67972912019-10-31 ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study Taylor, Johanna O'Neill, Mark Maddison, Jane Richardson, Gerry Hewitt, Catherine Horridge, Karen Cade, Janet McCarter, Alison Beresford, Bryony Fraser, Lorna Katharine BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of children require having all, or part, of their nutritional intake via gastrostomy. More parents are using home-blended meals to feed their children, with many reporting beneficial effects such as improved gastro-oesophageal reflux, less constipation and less distress in their child. This study aims to identify the important outcomes of tube feeding in this population, compare the safety, outcomes and resource use of those on a home-blended diet compared with a formula diet and assess feasibility of long-term follow-up of children recruited to this study. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This is a mixed methods study of children (aged 6 months to 18 years) who are gastrostomy feed dependent recruited via general, community and specialist paediatric and dietetic services. Workstream 1 (WS1): a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with parents (n~20) and young people (n~5–10), and focus groups with health professionals (n~25), will provide evidence of appropriate outcome measures and the feasibility/acceptability of proposed data collection methods for WS2. It will gather data on: desired outcomes of gastrostomy feeding, variability in diets and reasons; use of oral feeding; perceived benefits of the alternative diets, resources associated with gastrostomy feeding and safety issues. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis. WS2: a cohort study of 300 children who are gastrostomy fed. Data will be collected at months 0, 9 and 18 from parents, children (if appropriate) and clinicians using standardised measures and questionnaires developed specifically for the study. Data collected will include gastrointestinal symptoms, health and other outcomes (child, parent), dietary intake, anthropometry, healthcare usage, safety outcomes and resource use. Outcomes in the home-blended and formula groups will be compared using appropriate multiple regression analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by a research ethics committee (REC reference: 19/YH/0028). Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations for professionals and families. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13977361. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6797291/ /pubmed/31601609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033831 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Paediatrics Taylor, Johanna O'Neill, Mark Maddison, Jane Richardson, Gerry Hewitt, Catherine Horridge, Karen Cade, Janet McCarter, Alison Beresford, Bryony Fraser, Lorna Katharine ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title | ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title_full | ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title_fullStr | ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title_short | ‘Your Tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
title_sort | ‘your tube’: the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study |
topic | Paediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorjohanna yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT oneillmark yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT maddisonjane yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT richardsongerry yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT hewittcatherine yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT horridgekaren yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT cadejanet yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT mccarteralison yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT beresfordbryony yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy AT fraserlornakatharine yourtubetheroleofdifferentdietsinchildrenwhoaregastrostomyfedprotocolforamixedmethodsexploratorysequentialstudy |