Cargando…

Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of deprivation on the demand for calls to National Health Service Direct Wales (NHSDW) controlling for confounding factors. DESIGN: Study of routine data on over 400 000 calls to NHSDW using multiple regression to analyse the logarithms of ward-specific call rates a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peconi, Julie, Macey, Steven, Rodgers, Sarah E, Russell, Ian T, Snooks, Helen, Watkins, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31604783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029203
_version_ 1783459803687813120
author Peconi, Julie
Macey, Steven
Rodgers, Sarah E
Russell, Ian T
Snooks, Helen
Watkins, Alan
author_facet Peconi, Julie
Macey, Steven
Rodgers, Sarah E
Russell, Ian T
Snooks, Helen
Watkins, Alan
author_sort Peconi, Julie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of deprivation on the demand for calls to National Health Service Direct Wales (NHSDW) controlling for confounding factors. DESIGN: Study of routine data on over 400 000 calls to NHSDW using multiple regression to analyse the logarithms of ward-specific call rates across Wales by characteristics of call, patient and ward, notably the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. SETTING: 810 electoral wards with average population of 3300, defined by 1998 administrative boundaries. POPULATION: All calls to NHSDW between January 2002 and June 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used ward populations as denominators to calculate the rates of three categories of calls: calls seeking advice, calls seeking information and all calls combined. RESULTS: Confounding variables explained 31% of variation in advice call rates, but only 14% of variation in information call rates and in all call rates (all significant at 0.1% level). However, deprivation was only a statistically significant predictor of information call rates. The proportion of the ward population categorised as ‘white’ was a highly significant predictor of all three call rates. For advice calls and combined calls, rates decreased highly significantly with the proportion of those who called the service for themselves. Information call rates were higher on weekdays and highest on Mondays, while advice call rates were highest on Sundays. CONCLUSIONS: Deprivation had no consistent effect on demand for the service and the relationship needs further exploration. While our data may have underestimated the ‘need’ of deprived patients, they yield no evidence that policy-makers should seek to improve demand from those patients. However, we found differences in the way callers use advice and information calls. Previously unexplored variables that help to predict ward-specific call rates include: ethnicity, day of the week and whether patients made the calls themselves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67973422019-10-31 Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales Peconi, Julie Macey, Steven Rodgers, Sarah E Russell, Ian T Snooks, Helen Watkins, Alan BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of deprivation on the demand for calls to National Health Service Direct Wales (NHSDW) controlling for confounding factors. DESIGN: Study of routine data on over 400 000 calls to NHSDW using multiple regression to analyse the logarithms of ward-specific call rates across Wales by characteristics of call, patient and ward, notably the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. SETTING: 810 electoral wards with average population of 3300, defined by 1998 administrative boundaries. POPULATION: All calls to NHSDW between January 2002 and June 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used ward populations as denominators to calculate the rates of three categories of calls: calls seeking advice, calls seeking information and all calls combined. RESULTS: Confounding variables explained 31% of variation in advice call rates, but only 14% of variation in information call rates and in all call rates (all significant at 0.1% level). However, deprivation was only a statistically significant predictor of information call rates. The proportion of the ward population categorised as ‘white’ was a highly significant predictor of all three call rates. For advice calls and combined calls, rates decreased highly significantly with the proportion of those who called the service for themselves. Information call rates were higher on weekdays and highest on Mondays, while advice call rates were highest on Sundays. CONCLUSIONS: Deprivation had no consistent effect on demand for the service and the relationship needs further exploration. While our data may have underestimated the ‘need’ of deprived patients, they yield no evidence that policy-makers should seek to improve demand from those patients. However, we found differences in the way callers use advice and information calls. Previously unexplored variables that help to predict ward-specific call rates include: ethnicity, day of the week and whether patients made the calls themselves. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6797342/ /pubmed/31604783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029203 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Peconi, Julie
Macey, Steven
Rodgers, Sarah E
Russell, Ian T
Snooks, Helen
Watkins, Alan
Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title_full Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title_fullStr Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title_full_unstemmed Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title_short Does deprivation affect the demand for NHS Direct? Observational study of routine data from Wales
title_sort does deprivation affect the demand for nhs direct? observational study of routine data from wales
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31604783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029203
work_keys_str_mv AT peconijulie doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales
AT maceysteven doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales
AT rodgerssarahe doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales
AT russelliant doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales
AT snookshelen doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales
AT watkinsalan doesdeprivationaffectthedemandfornhsdirectobservationalstudyofroutinedatafromwales