Cargando…
Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study
INTRODUCTION: Combined with patient history and physical examination, a negative D-dimer can safely rule-out pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the D-dimer test is frequently false positive, leading to many (with hindsight) ‘unneeded’ referrals to secondary care. Recently, the novel YEARS algorithm,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031639 |
_version_ | 1783459808026820608 |
---|---|
author | van Maanen, Rosanne Rutten, Frans H Klok, Frederikus A Huisman, Menno V Blom, Jeanet W Moons, Karel G M Geersing, Geert-Jan |
author_facet | van Maanen, Rosanne Rutten, Frans H Klok, Frederikus A Huisman, Menno V Blom, Jeanet W Moons, Karel G M Geersing, Geert-Jan |
author_sort | van Maanen, Rosanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Combined with patient history and physical examination, a negative D-dimer can safely rule-out pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the D-dimer test is frequently false positive, leading to many (with hindsight) ‘unneeded’ referrals to secondary care. Recently, the novel YEARS algorithm, incorporating flexible D-dimer thresholds depending on pretest risk, was developed and validated, showing its ability to safely exclude PE in the hospital environment. Importantly, this was accompanied with 14% fewer computed tomographic pulmonary angiography than the standard, fixed D-dimer threshold. Although promising, in primary care this algorithm has not been validated yet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PECAN (Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in the context of Common Alternative diagNoses in primary care) study is a prospective diagnostic study performed in Dutch primary care. Included patients with suspected acute PE will be managed by their general practitioner according to the YEARS diagnostic algorithm and followed up in primary care for 3 months to establish the final diagnosis. To study the impact of the use of the YEARS algorithm, the primary endpoints are the safety and efficiency of the YEARS algorithm in primary care. Safety is defined as the proportion of false-negative test results in those not referred. Efficiency denotes the proportion of patients classified in this non-referred category. Additionally, we quantify whether C reactive protein measurement has added diagnostic value to the YEARS algorithm, using multivariable logistic and polytomous regression modelling. Furthermore, we will investigate which factors contribute to the subjective YEARS item ‘PE most likely diagnosis’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee Utrecht, the Netherlands. Patients eligible for inclusion will be asked for their consent. Results will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at (inter)national meetings and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR 7431. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67973592019-10-31 Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study van Maanen, Rosanne Rutten, Frans H Klok, Frederikus A Huisman, Menno V Blom, Jeanet W Moons, Karel G M Geersing, Geert-Jan BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Combined with patient history and physical examination, a negative D-dimer can safely rule-out pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the D-dimer test is frequently false positive, leading to many (with hindsight) ‘unneeded’ referrals to secondary care. Recently, the novel YEARS algorithm, incorporating flexible D-dimer thresholds depending on pretest risk, was developed and validated, showing its ability to safely exclude PE in the hospital environment. Importantly, this was accompanied with 14% fewer computed tomographic pulmonary angiography than the standard, fixed D-dimer threshold. Although promising, in primary care this algorithm has not been validated yet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PECAN (Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in the context of Common Alternative diagNoses in primary care) study is a prospective diagnostic study performed in Dutch primary care. Included patients with suspected acute PE will be managed by their general practitioner according to the YEARS diagnostic algorithm and followed up in primary care for 3 months to establish the final diagnosis. To study the impact of the use of the YEARS algorithm, the primary endpoints are the safety and efficiency of the YEARS algorithm in primary care. Safety is defined as the proportion of false-negative test results in those not referred. Efficiency denotes the proportion of patients classified in this non-referred category. Additionally, we quantify whether C reactive protein measurement has added diagnostic value to the YEARS algorithm, using multivariable logistic and polytomous regression modelling. Furthermore, we will investigate which factors contribute to the subjective YEARS item ‘PE most likely diagnosis’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee Utrecht, the Netherlands. Patients eligible for inclusion will be asked for their consent. Results will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at (inter)national meetings and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR 7431. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6797359/ /pubmed/31601598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031639 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice van Maanen, Rosanne Rutten, Frans H Klok, Frederikus A Huisman, Menno V Blom, Jeanet W Moons, Karel G M Geersing, Geert-Jan Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title | Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title_full | Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title_fullStr | Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title_short | Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
title_sort | validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the pecan prospective diagnostic cohort management study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31601598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmaanenrosanne validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT ruttenfransh validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT klokfrederikusa validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT huismanmennov validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT blomjeanetw validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT moonskarelgm validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy AT geersinggeertjan validationandimpactofasimplifiedclinicaldecisionrulefordiagnosingpulmonaryembolisminprimarycaredesignofthepecanprospectivediagnosticcohortmanagementstudy |