Cargando…

Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs

OBJECTIVES: Glaucoma filtering schemes such as the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme (GERS) aim to reduce the number of false positive cases referred to Hospital Eye Services. Such schemes can also have wider system benefits, as they may reduce waiting times for other patients. However, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forbes, Hannah, Sutton, Matt, Edgar, David F, Lawrenson, John, Spencer, Anne Fiona, Fenerty, Cecilia, Harper, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000278
_version_ 1783459812523114496
author Forbes, Hannah
Sutton, Matt
Edgar, David F
Lawrenson, John
Spencer, Anne Fiona
Fenerty, Cecilia
Harper, Robert
author_facet Forbes, Hannah
Sutton, Matt
Edgar, David F
Lawrenson, John
Spencer, Anne Fiona
Fenerty, Cecilia
Harper, Robert
author_sort Forbes, Hannah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Glaucoma filtering schemes such as the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme (GERS) aim to reduce the number of false positive cases referred to Hospital Eye Services. Such schemes can also have wider system benefits, as they may reduce waiting times for other patients. However, previous studies of the cost consequences and wider system benefits of glaucoma filtering schemes are inconclusive. We investigate the cost consequences of the Manchester GERS. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: A cost analysis from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) was conducted using audit data from the Manchester GERS. RESULTS: 2405 patients passed through the Manchester GERS from April 2013 to November 2016. 53.3% were not referred on to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH). Assuming an average of 2.3 outpatient visits to MREH were avoided for each filtered patient, the scheme saved the NHS approximately £2.76 per patient passing through the scheme. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that glaucoma filtering schemes have the potential to reduce false positive referrals and costs to the NHS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67973772019-10-31 Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs Forbes, Hannah Sutton, Matt Edgar, David F Lawrenson, John Spencer, Anne Fiona Fenerty, Cecilia Harper, Robert BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVES: Glaucoma filtering schemes such as the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme (GERS) aim to reduce the number of false positive cases referred to Hospital Eye Services. Such schemes can also have wider system benefits, as they may reduce waiting times for other patients. However, previous studies of the cost consequences and wider system benefits of glaucoma filtering schemes are inconclusive. We investigate the cost consequences of the Manchester GERS. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: A cost analysis from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) was conducted using audit data from the Manchester GERS. RESULTS: 2405 patients passed through the Manchester GERS from April 2013 to November 2016. 53.3% were not referred on to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH). Assuming an average of 2.3 outpatient visits to MREH were avoided for each filtered patient, the scheme saved the NHS approximately £2.76 per patient passing through the scheme. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that glaucoma filtering schemes have the potential to reduce false positive referrals and costs to the NHS. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6797377/ /pubmed/31673631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000278 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Forbes, Hannah
Sutton, Matt
Edgar, David F
Lawrenson, John
Spencer, Anne Fiona
Fenerty, Cecilia
Harper, Robert
Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title_full Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title_fullStr Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title_short Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs
title_sort impact of the manchester glaucoma enhanced referral scheme on nhs costs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000278
work_keys_str_mv AT forbeshannah impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT suttonmatt impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT edgardavidf impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT lawrensonjohn impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT spencerannefiona impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT fenertycecilia impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts
AT harperrobert impactofthemanchesterglaucomaenhancedreferralschemeonnhscosts