Cargando…

Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists

OBJECTIVES: To survey the reported content, frequency and duration of upper limb treatment provided by occupational and physiotherapists for people after stroke in the UK. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey was used. Description and analysis of the data were based on items from the Template for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stockley, Rachel, Peel, Rosemary, Jarvis, Kathryn, Connell, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030262
_version_ 1783459815457030144
author Stockley, Rachel
Peel, Rosemary
Jarvis, Kathryn
Connell, Louise
author_facet Stockley, Rachel
Peel, Rosemary
Jarvis, Kathryn
Connell, Louise
author_sort Stockley, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To survey the reported content, frequency and duration of upper limb treatment provided by occupational and physiotherapists for people after stroke in the UK. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey was used. Description and analysis of the data were based on items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Who, Where, What and How much). SETTING: The online survey was distributed via professional and social networks to UK-based therapists. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were occupational or physiotherapists currently working clinically in the UK with people after stroke. Over the 6 week data collection period, 156 respondents opened the survey, and 154 completed it. Respondents comprised 85 physiotherapists and 69 occupational therapists. RESULTS: Respondents reported treating the upper limb a median of three times a week (range: 1 to 7) for a mean of 29 min (SD: 18). Most (n=110) stated this was supplemented by rehabilitation assistants, family and/or carers providing additional therapy a median of three times a week (range 1 to 7). Functional training was the most commonly reported treatment for people with mild and moderate upper limb deficits (>40%). There was much less consistency in treatments reported for people with severe upper limb deficits with less than 20% (n=28) reporting the same treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a contemporaneous description of reported therapy in the UK for people with upper limb deficits after stroke and a detailed template to inform standard therapy interventions in future research. Several evidence-based therapies were reported to be used by respondents (eg, constraint induced movement therapy), but others were not (eg, mental imagery). The findings also highlight that the current reported provision of upper limb therapy is markedly less than what is likely to be effective. This underlines an urgent need to configure and fund services to empower therapists to deliver greater amounts of evidence-based treatment for people with upper limb deficits after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67973882019-10-31 Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists Stockley, Rachel Peel, Rosemary Jarvis, Kathryn Connell, Louise BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To survey the reported content, frequency and duration of upper limb treatment provided by occupational and physiotherapists for people after stroke in the UK. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey was used. Description and analysis of the data were based on items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Who, Where, What and How much). SETTING: The online survey was distributed via professional and social networks to UK-based therapists. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were occupational or physiotherapists currently working clinically in the UK with people after stroke. Over the 6 week data collection period, 156 respondents opened the survey, and 154 completed it. Respondents comprised 85 physiotherapists and 69 occupational therapists. RESULTS: Respondents reported treating the upper limb a median of three times a week (range: 1 to 7) for a mean of 29 min (SD: 18). Most (n=110) stated this was supplemented by rehabilitation assistants, family and/or carers providing additional therapy a median of three times a week (range 1 to 7). Functional training was the most commonly reported treatment for people with mild and moderate upper limb deficits (>40%). There was much less consistency in treatments reported for people with severe upper limb deficits with less than 20% (n=28) reporting the same treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a contemporaneous description of reported therapy in the UK for people with upper limb deficits after stroke and a detailed template to inform standard therapy interventions in future research. Several evidence-based therapies were reported to be used by respondents (eg, constraint induced movement therapy), but others were not (eg, mental imagery). The findings also highlight that the current reported provision of upper limb therapy is markedly less than what is likely to be effective. This underlines an urgent need to configure and fund services to empower therapists to deliver greater amounts of evidence-based treatment for people with upper limb deficits after stroke. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6797388/ /pubmed/31575573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030262 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Stockley, Rachel
Peel, Rosemary
Jarvis, Kathryn
Connell, Louise
Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title_full Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title_fullStr Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title_full_unstemmed Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title_short Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists
title_sort current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of uk therapists
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030262
work_keys_str_mv AT stockleyrachel currenttherapyfortheupperlimbafterstrokeacrosssectionalsurveyofuktherapists
AT peelrosemary currenttherapyfortheupperlimbafterstrokeacrosssectionalsurveyofuktherapists
AT jarviskathryn currenttherapyfortheupperlimbafterstrokeacrosssectionalsurveyofuktherapists
AT connelllouise currenttherapyfortheupperlimbafterstrokeacrosssectionalsurveyofuktherapists