Cargando…
Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section
Empowering patients and working collaboratively to improve healthcare is a focus for current healthcare development strategies. In obstetric practice, working in collaboration with women to discuss mode of delivery after caesarean section has been shown to impact women’s choice. A preliminary survey...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000454 |
_version_ | 1783459816217247744 |
---|---|
author | Dougan, Claire Smith, Emma Ploski, Jennifer Mc Nally, Arthur Johnston, Katie |
author_facet | Dougan, Claire Smith, Emma Ploski, Jennifer Mc Nally, Arthur Johnston, Katie |
author_sort | Dougan, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | Empowering patients and working collaboratively to improve healthcare is a focus for current healthcare development strategies. In obstetric practice, working in collaboration with women to discuss mode of delivery after caesarean section has been shown to impact women’s choice. A preliminary survey in our tertiary maternity unit showed 20% of women gained ‘full clarity’ with the information they received after caesarean-section regarding indication, complications and impact on future delivery. Focus groups identified what information patients required about their surgery. General practitioners (GP) highlighted a lack of communication between secondary and primary care. Junior obstetricians surveyed felt uncertain about debriefing. The aim was to improve monthly ‘full clarity’ scores to 30% in 6 months. Our team introduced a debrief form, filled by the operator and kept in maternity notes. The operator verbally debriefed as part of their current standard practice. Junior doctors postoperatively debriefed the patient using the form. The triplicate form ensured both patients and primary care received a copy. It was anticipated that in the long term, this would provide consistent information and aid informed decision making in subsequent pregnancies. Review of the forms’ use was undertaken weekly. Multidisciplinary input identified barriers to uptake. Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles promoted the project, disseminated results, evidenced growing participation and rewarded consistent form use. Patient groups critiqued the form layout. Teaching aimed to improve junior doctor confidence in debriefing discussions. Sustained participation resulted in effective form uptake. Patient ‘full clarity’ scores improved to 60% with minimal impact on workload. Teaching successfully improved junior doctor confidence as evidenced by increased documented debrief discussions. GP focus groups felt empowered to counsel women consistently about their surgery increasing clarity for everyone. This project highlights that patient satisfaction improves when we listen to their views and commit to change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67973912019-10-31 Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section Dougan, Claire Smith, Emma Ploski, Jennifer Mc Nally, Arthur Johnston, Katie BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report Empowering patients and working collaboratively to improve healthcare is a focus for current healthcare development strategies. In obstetric practice, working in collaboration with women to discuss mode of delivery after caesarean section has been shown to impact women’s choice. A preliminary survey in our tertiary maternity unit showed 20% of women gained ‘full clarity’ with the information they received after caesarean-section regarding indication, complications and impact on future delivery. Focus groups identified what information patients required about their surgery. General practitioners (GP) highlighted a lack of communication between secondary and primary care. Junior obstetricians surveyed felt uncertain about debriefing. The aim was to improve monthly ‘full clarity’ scores to 30% in 6 months. Our team introduced a debrief form, filled by the operator and kept in maternity notes. The operator verbally debriefed as part of their current standard practice. Junior doctors postoperatively debriefed the patient using the form. The triplicate form ensured both patients and primary care received a copy. It was anticipated that in the long term, this would provide consistent information and aid informed decision making in subsequent pregnancies. Review of the forms’ use was undertaken weekly. Multidisciplinary input identified barriers to uptake. Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles promoted the project, disseminated results, evidenced growing participation and rewarded consistent form use. Patient groups critiqued the form layout. Teaching aimed to improve junior doctor confidence in debriefing discussions. Sustained participation resulted in effective form uptake. Patient ‘full clarity’ scores improved to 60% with minimal impact on workload. Teaching successfully improved junior doctor confidence as evidenced by increased documented debrief discussions. GP focus groups felt empowered to counsel women consistently about their surgery increasing clarity for everyone. This project highlights that patient satisfaction improves when we listen to their views and commit to change. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6797391/ /pubmed/31673638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000454 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Dougan, Claire Smith, Emma Ploski, Jennifer Mc Nally, Arthur Johnston, Katie Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title | Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title_full | Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title_fullStr | Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title_short | Patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
title_sort | patients at the centre of care: debriefing patients after caesarean section |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douganclaire patientsatthecentreofcaredebriefingpatientsaftercaesareansection AT smithemma patientsatthecentreofcaredebriefingpatientsaftercaesareansection AT ploskijennifer patientsatthecentreofcaredebriefingpatientsaftercaesareansection AT mcnallyarthur patientsatthecentreofcaredebriefingpatientsaftercaesareansection AT johnstonkatie patientsatthecentreofcaredebriefingpatientsaftercaesareansection |