Cargando…
Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job?
Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most common and severe postpartum morbidity, affecting 10%–20% of mothers within the first year of childbirth. The adverse effects of PPD, namely, prevention of mother-baby bonding and early cessation of breastfeeding, adversely affects infant growth and bra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000616 |
_version_ | 1783459822002241536 |
---|---|
author | Sudhanthar, Sathyanarayan Sheikh, Zile-e-huma Thakur, Kripa |
author_facet | Sudhanthar, Sathyanarayan Sheikh, Zile-e-huma Thakur, Kripa |
author_sort | Sudhanthar, Sathyanarayan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most common and severe postpartum morbidity, affecting 10%–20% of mothers within the first year of childbirth. The adverse effects of PPD, namely, prevention of mother-baby bonding and early cessation of breastfeeding, adversely affects infant growth and brain development. Studies have found that up to 50% of women with PPD go undiagnosed. Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations, only a small percentage of paediatricians are currently screening for PPD. This project aimed to improve PPD screening using a validated tool to 75% in a primary care inner-city clinic serving a predominantly underserved population as per AAP recommendations. Baseline data for 40 charts of 2-month-old and 4-month-old well-child visits showed no documentation of PPD screening. The screening tool used for this project was the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), which is a validated 10-item screening questionnaire for PPD. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented involving educational strategies, system-based practice improvement and stakeholder participation. Improvement seen after PDSA cycle 1 was minimal. At the end of cycle 2, 16/50 (33%) charts had documentation of screening using EPDS. At the end of cycle 3, 33/40 (82%) charts had EPDS documentation, an increase of 49% from cycle 2. There were eight in total positive PPD screenings between cycles 2 and 3. These patients were provided counselling support through a social worker and referral services through the local community mental health organisation. We achieved more than our 75% target goal for PPD screening implementation at the residency clinic, thereby increasing residents’ awareness of PPD and the importance of PPD screening. Poststudy follow-up shows that screening was maintained at a higher rate but never reached 100%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67974142019-10-31 Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? Sudhanthar, Sathyanarayan Sheikh, Zile-e-huma Thakur, Kripa BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most common and severe postpartum morbidity, affecting 10%–20% of mothers within the first year of childbirth. The adverse effects of PPD, namely, prevention of mother-baby bonding and early cessation of breastfeeding, adversely affects infant growth and brain development. Studies have found that up to 50% of women with PPD go undiagnosed. Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations, only a small percentage of paediatricians are currently screening for PPD. This project aimed to improve PPD screening using a validated tool to 75% in a primary care inner-city clinic serving a predominantly underserved population as per AAP recommendations. Baseline data for 40 charts of 2-month-old and 4-month-old well-child visits showed no documentation of PPD screening. The screening tool used for this project was the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), which is a validated 10-item screening questionnaire for PPD. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented involving educational strategies, system-based practice improvement and stakeholder participation. Improvement seen after PDSA cycle 1 was minimal. At the end of cycle 2, 16/50 (33%) charts had documentation of screening using EPDS. At the end of cycle 3, 33/40 (82%) charts had EPDS documentation, an increase of 49% from cycle 2. There were eight in total positive PPD screenings between cycles 2 and 3. These patients were provided counselling support through a social worker and referral services through the local community mental health organisation. We achieved more than our 75% target goal for PPD screening implementation at the residency clinic, thereby increasing residents’ awareness of PPD and the importance of PPD screening. Poststudy follow-up shows that screening was maintained at a higher rate but never reached 100%. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6797414/ /pubmed/31673639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000616 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Sudhanthar, Sathyanarayan Sheikh, Zile-e-huma Thakur, Kripa Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title | Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title_full | Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title_fullStr | Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title_full_unstemmed | Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title_short | Postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
title_sort | postpartum depression screening: are we doing a competent job? |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sudhantharsathyanarayan postpartumdepressionscreeningarewedoingacompetentjob AT sheikhzileehuma postpartumdepressionscreeningarewedoingacompetentjob AT thakurkripa postpartumdepressionscreeningarewedoingacompetentjob |