Cargando…
Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol
INTRODUCTION: A broad range of stakeholders have called for randomised evidence on the potential clinical benefits and harms of proton therapy, a type of radiation therapy, for patients with breast cancer. Radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment, reducing cancer recurrence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025556 |
_version_ | 1783459824985440256 |
---|---|
author | Bekelman, Justin E Lu, Hien Pugh, Stephanie Baker, Kaysee Berg, Christine D de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington Braunstein, Lior Z Bosch, Walter Chauhan, Cynthia Ellenberg, Susan Fang, L Christine Freedman, Gary M Hahn, Elizabeth A Haffty, B G Khan, Atif J Jimenez, Rachel B Kesslering, Christy Ky, Bonnie Lee, Choonsik Lu, Hsiao-Ming Mishra, Mark V Mullins, C Daniel Mutter, Robert W Nagda, Suneel Pankuch, Mark Powell, Simon N Prior, Fred W Schupak, Karen Taghian, Alphonse G Wilkinson, J Ben MacDonald, Shannon M Cahlon, Oren |
author_facet | Bekelman, Justin E Lu, Hien Pugh, Stephanie Baker, Kaysee Berg, Christine D de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington Braunstein, Lior Z Bosch, Walter Chauhan, Cynthia Ellenberg, Susan Fang, L Christine Freedman, Gary M Hahn, Elizabeth A Haffty, B G Khan, Atif J Jimenez, Rachel B Kesslering, Christy Ky, Bonnie Lee, Choonsik Lu, Hsiao-Ming Mishra, Mark V Mullins, C Daniel Mutter, Robert W Nagda, Suneel Pankuch, Mark Powell, Simon N Prior, Fred W Schupak, Karen Taghian, Alphonse G Wilkinson, J Ben MacDonald, Shannon M Cahlon, Oren |
author_sort | Bekelman, Justin E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A broad range of stakeholders have called for randomised evidence on the potential clinical benefits and harms of proton therapy, a type of radiation therapy, for patients with breast cancer. Radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment, reducing cancer recurrence and extending survival. Compared with photon therapy, the international treatment standard, proton therapy reduces incidental radiation to the heart. Our overall objective is to evaluate whether the differences between proton and photon therapy cardiac radiation dose distributions lead to meaningful reductions in cardiac morbidity and mortality after treatment for breast cancer. METHODS: We are conducting a large scale, multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial for patients with breast cancer who will be followed longitudinally for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life and cancer control outcomes. A total of 1278 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer will be randomly allocated to receive either photon or proton therapy. The primary outcomes are major cardiovascular events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for unstable angina, heart failure, valvular disease, arrhythmia or pericardial disease. Secondary endpoints are urgent or unanticipated outpatient or emergency room visits for heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular disease or pericardial disease. The Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Clinical Events Centre will conduct centralised, blinded adjudication of primary outcome events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RadComp trial has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating sites. Recruitment began in February 2016. Current version of the protocol is A3, dated 08 November 2018. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, stakeholder engagement efforts and presentation to the public via lay media outlets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02603341 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67974262019-10-31 Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol Bekelman, Justin E Lu, Hien Pugh, Stephanie Baker, Kaysee Berg, Christine D de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington Braunstein, Lior Z Bosch, Walter Chauhan, Cynthia Ellenberg, Susan Fang, L Christine Freedman, Gary M Hahn, Elizabeth A Haffty, B G Khan, Atif J Jimenez, Rachel B Kesslering, Christy Ky, Bonnie Lee, Choonsik Lu, Hsiao-Ming Mishra, Mark V Mullins, C Daniel Mutter, Robert W Nagda, Suneel Pankuch, Mark Powell, Simon N Prior, Fred W Schupak, Karen Taghian, Alphonse G Wilkinson, J Ben MacDonald, Shannon M Cahlon, Oren BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: A broad range of stakeholders have called for randomised evidence on the potential clinical benefits and harms of proton therapy, a type of radiation therapy, for patients with breast cancer. Radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment, reducing cancer recurrence and extending survival. Compared with photon therapy, the international treatment standard, proton therapy reduces incidental radiation to the heart. Our overall objective is to evaluate whether the differences between proton and photon therapy cardiac radiation dose distributions lead to meaningful reductions in cardiac morbidity and mortality after treatment for breast cancer. METHODS: We are conducting a large scale, multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial for patients with breast cancer who will be followed longitudinally for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life and cancer control outcomes. A total of 1278 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer will be randomly allocated to receive either photon or proton therapy. The primary outcomes are major cardiovascular events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for unstable angina, heart failure, valvular disease, arrhythmia or pericardial disease. Secondary endpoints are urgent or unanticipated outpatient or emergency room visits for heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular disease or pericardial disease. The Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Clinical Events Centre will conduct centralised, blinded adjudication of primary outcome events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RadComp trial has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating sites. Recruitment began in February 2016. Current version of the protocol is A3, dated 08 November 2018. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, stakeholder engagement efforts and presentation to the public via lay media outlets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02603341 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6797426/ /pubmed/31619413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025556 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Bekelman, Justin E Lu, Hien Pugh, Stephanie Baker, Kaysee Berg, Christine D de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington Braunstein, Lior Z Bosch, Walter Chauhan, Cynthia Ellenberg, Susan Fang, L Christine Freedman, Gary M Hahn, Elizabeth A Haffty, B G Khan, Atif J Jimenez, Rachel B Kesslering, Christy Ky, Bonnie Lee, Choonsik Lu, Hsiao-Ming Mishra, Mark V Mullins, C Daniel Mutter, Robert W Nagda, Suneel Pankuch, Mark Powell, Simon N Prior, Fred W Schupak, Karen Taghian, Alphonse G Wilkinson, J Ben MacDonald, Shannon M Cahlon, Oren Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title | Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title_full | Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title_short | Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol |
title_sort | pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the radiotherapy comparative effectiveness (radcomp) consortium trial protocol |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bekelmanjustine pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT luhien pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT pughstephanie pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT bakerkaysee pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT bergchristined pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT degonzalezamyberrington pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT braunsteinliorz pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT boschwalter pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT chauhancynthia pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT ellenbergsusan pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT fanglchristine pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT freedmangarym pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT hahnelizabetha pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT hafftybg pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT khanatifj pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT jimenezrachelb pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT kessleringchristy pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT kybonnie pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT leechoonsik pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT luhsiaoming pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT mishramarkv pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT mullinscdaniel pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT mutterrobertw pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT nagdasuneel pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT pankuchmark pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT powellsimonn pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT priorfredw pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT schupakkaren pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT taghianalphonseg pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT wilkinsonjben pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT macdonaldshannonm pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT cahlonoren pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol AT pragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialofprotonversusphotontherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticbreastcancertheradiotherapycomparativeeffectivenessradcompconsortiumtrialprotocol |