Cargando…
The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636875 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022 |
_version_ | 1783459829976662016 |
---|---|
author | Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Fendereski, Zeinab Alavi, Samin Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat |
author_facet | Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Fendereski, Zeinab Alavi, Samin Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat |
author_sort | Nakhaei, Mohammadreza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 milled cubes of Cp Ti was airborne-particle abraded using 250 μm aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then divided into 5 groups (n=20) according to the type of resin cement used: (1) Panavia F.2, (2) Rely X U200, (3) Panavia SA LUTING Plus, (4) GC Fuji I, and (5) GC FujiCEM 2. After 24h storage, half of the samples were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. Next, the bonded samples were tested in the micro-shear mode. Data (MPa) were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). After debonding, each sample was examined for the failure mode classification. RESULTS: The highest μSBS value in the study cements was obtained for Panavia F.2 cement (P<0.001) with no significant difference with Rely X U200 (P=0.07). The μSBS values of both GI-based cements were significantly lower than those of resin cements. Thermal aging decreased the μSBS values of all groups (P=0.003) significantly. The mainly occurred failure mode in all groups was the adhesive feature. CONCLUSIONS: Resin cements demonstrated acceptable bonding to Cp Ti, yet Gl-based cements did not. From among the cements examined, Panavia F.2 can be considered as the best option for bonding to Ti. Key words:Bond strength, Glass ionomer, Hybride abutment, Resin cement, Titanium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67974452019-10-21 The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Fendereski, Zeinab Alavi, Samin Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 milled cubes of Cp Ti was airborne-particle abraded using 250 μm aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then divided into 5 groups (n=20) according to the type of resin cement used: (1) Panavia F.2, (2) Rely X U200, (3) Panavia SA LUTING Plus, (4) GC Fuji I, and (5) GC FujiCEM 2. After 24h storage, half of the samples were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. Next, the bonded samples were tested in the micro-shear mode. Data (MPa) were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). After debonding, each sample was examined for the failure mode classification. RESULTS: The highest μSBS value in the study cements was obtained for Panavia F.2 cement (P<0.001) with no significant difference with Rely X U200 (P=0.07). The μSBS values of both GI-based cements were significantly lower than those of resin cements. Thermal aging decreased the μSBS values of all groups (P=0.003) significantly. The mainly occurred failure mode in all groups was the adhesive feature. CONCLUSIONS: Resin cements demonstrated acceptable bonding to Cp Ti, yet Gl-based cements did not. From among the cements examined, Panavia F.2 can be considered as the best option for bonding to Ti. Key words:Bond strength, Glass ionomer, Hybride abutment, Resin cement, Titanium. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6797445/ /pubmed/31636875 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Fendereski, Zeinab Alavi, Samin Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title | The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title_full | The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title_fullStr | The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title_full_unstemmed | The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title_short | The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
title_sort | micro-shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636875 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakhaeimohammadreza themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT fendereskizeinab themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT alavisamin themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT mohammadipourhamidehsadat themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT nakhaeimohammadreza microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT fendereskizeinab microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT alavisamin microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium AT mohammadipourhamidehsadat microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium |