Cargando…

The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakhaei, Mohammadreza, Fendereski, Zeinab, Alavi, Samin, Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636875
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022
_version_ 1783459829976662016
author Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Fendereski, Zeinab
Alavi, Samin
Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat
author_facet Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Fendereski, Zeinab
Alavi, Samin
Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat
author_sort Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 milled cubes of Cp Ti was airborne-particle abraded using 250 μm aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then divided into 5 groups (n=20) according to the type of resin cement used: (1) Panavia F.2, (2) Rely X U200, (3) Panavia SA LUTING Plus, (4) GC Fuji I, and (5) GC FujiCEM 2. After 24h storage, half of the samples were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. Next, the bonded samples were tested in the micro-shear mode. Data (MPa) were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). After debonding, each sample was examined for the failure mode classification. RESULTS: The highest μSBS value in the study cements was obtained for Panavia F.2 cement (P<0.001) with no significant difference with Rely X U200 (P=0.07). The μSBS values of both GI-based cements were significantly lower than those of resin cements. Thermal aging decreased the μSBS values of all groups (P=0.003) significantly. The mainly occurred failure mode in all groups was the adhesive feature. CONCLUSIONS: Resin cements demonstrated acceptable bonding to Cp Ti, yet Gl-based cements did not. From among the cements examined, Panavia F.2 can be considered as the best option for bonding to Ti. Key words:Bond strength, Glass ionomer, Hybride abutment, Resin cement, Titanium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67974452019-10-21 The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium Nakhaei, Mohammadreza Fendereski, Zeinab Alavi, Samin Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The most appropriate luting agent for attaching the prefabricated Ti-based insert of hybrid abutments to its ceramic component has not yet been determined. This study was done aimed at examining the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different cements to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 milled cubes of Cp Ti was airborne-particle abraded using 250 μm aluminum oxide particles. Specimens were then divided into 5 groups (n=20) according to the type of resin cement used: (1) Panavia F.2, (2) Rely X U200, (3) Panavia SA LUTING Plus, (4) GC Fuji I, and (5) GC FujiCEM 2. After 24h storage, half of the samples were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. Next, the bonded samples were tested in the micro-shear mode. Data (MPa) were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey test (α=0.05). After debonding, each sample was examined for the failure mode classification. RESULTS: The highest μSBS value in the study cements was obtained for Panavia F.2 cement (P<0.001) with no significant difference with Rely X U200 (P=0.07). The μSBS values of both GI-based cements were significantly lower than those of resin cements. Thermal aging decreased the μSBS values of all groups (P=0.003) significantly. The mainly occurred failure mode in all groups was the adhesive feature. CONCLUSIONS: Resin cements demonstrated acceptable bonding to Cp Ti, yet Gl-based cements did not. From among the cements examined, Panavia F.2 can be considered as the best option for bonding to Ti. Key words:Bond strength, Glass ionomer, Hybride abutment, Resin cement, Titanium. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6797445/ /pubmed/31636875 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nakhaei, Mohammadreza
Fendereski, Zeinab
Alavi, Samin
Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat
The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title_full The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title_fullStr The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title_full_unstemmed The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title_short The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
title_sort micro-shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636875
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56022
work_keys_str_mv AT nakhaeimohammadreza themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT fendereskizeinab themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT alavisamin themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT mohammadipourhamidehsadat themicroshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT nakhaeimohammadreza microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT fendereskizeinab microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT alavisamin microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium
AT mohammadipourhamidehsadat microshearbondstrengthofdifferentcementstocommerciallypuretitanium