Cargando…
The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial
BACKGROUND: Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication occurs on the post-extraction days that includes pain and disintegrated blood clot. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse after extraction is an effective method for decreasing the incidence of AO. Honey has natural antibacterial properties and effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55743 |
_version_ | 1783459832681988096 |
---|---|
author | Abu-Mostafa, Nedal Al-Daghamin, Saja Al-Anazi, Asma Al-Jumaah, Nesreen Alnesafi, Amenah |
author_facet | Abu-Mostafa, Nedal Al-Daghamin, Saja Al-Anazi, Asma Al-Jumaah, Nesreen Alnesafi, Amenah |
author_sort | Abu-Mostafa, Nedal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication occurs on the post-extraction days that includes pain and disintegrated blood clot. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse after extraction is an effective method for decreasing the incidence of AO. Honey has natural antibacterial properties and effectiveness when it is used as a dressing on burns and wounds. However, the effect of intraoral honey dressings on healing is still not adequately studied. This study aimed to compare pain and AO after extraction of a molar tooth in a group of patients who received the intra-alveolar application of Manuka Honey post-operatively with another group who used 0.2% CHX rinse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial of parallel groups was carried out on 100 patients who had a single molar tooth extraction. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group1 (G1) used 0.2 % CHX twice daily for 7 days. In Group2 (G2), Manuka Honey applied topically by a cotton swab into the socket directly after extraction and on Day3. Re-evaluation, including pain assessment, empty socket, and halitosis was done on day 3 and day 7. RESULTS: G1 included 43 patients and G2 included 57 patients. Higher grades of pain, more empty sockets, and halitosis were found in G2 than in G1 on day3 and day7 without significant differences. Four cases of AO were found in G1 (9.3%) and 7 cases in G2 (12.3%), without significant difference between the two groups according to Chi-squared tests (p=0.753). CONCLUSIONS: The application of Manuka honey in the extraction socket directly after extraction and on day 3 has been found to be insignificantly less efficient in the prevention of AO than CHX rinse twice daily for seven days. However, honey is promising as natural dressing material and further studies are recommended. Key words:Manuka honey, Chlorhexidine, Alveolar Osteitis, extraction, dry socket. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67974562019-10-21 The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial Abu-Mostafa, Nedal Al-Daghamin, Saja Al-Anazi, Asma Al-Jumaah, Nesreen Alnesafi, Amenah J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication occurs on the post-extraction days that includes pain and disintegrated blood clot. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse after extraction is an effective method for decreasing the incidence of AO. Honey has natural antibacterial properties and effectiveness when it is used as a dressing on burns and wounds. However, the effect of intraoral honey dressings on healing is still not adequately studied. This study aimed to compare pain and AO after extraction of a molar tooth in a group of patients who received the intra-alveolar application of Manuka Honey post-operatively with another group who used 0.2% CHX rinse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial of parallel groups was carried out on 100 patients who had a single molar tooth extraction. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group1 (G1) used 0.2 % CHX twice daily for 7 days. In Group2 (G2), Manuka Honey applied topically by a cotton swab into the socket directly after extraction and on Day3. Re-evaluation, including pain assessment, empty socket, and halitosis was done on day 3 and day 7. RESULTS: G1 included 43 patients and G2 included 57 patients. Higher grades of pain, more empty sockets, and halitosis were found in G2 than in G1 on day3 and day7 without significant differences. Four cases of AO were found in G1 (9.3%) and 7 cases in G2 (12.3%), without significant difference between the two groups according to Chi-squared tests (p=0.753). CONCLUSIONS: The application of Manuka honey in the extraction socket directly after extraction and on day 3 has been found to be insignificantly less efficient in the prevention of AO than CHX rinse twice daily for seven days. However, honey is promising as natural dressing material and further studies are recommended. Key words:Manuka honey, Chlorhexidine, Alveolar Osteitis, extraction, dry socket. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6797456/ /pubmed/31636855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55743 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Abu-Mostafa, Nedal Al-Daghamin, Saja Al-Anazi, Asma Al-Jumaah, Nesreen Alnesafi, Amenah The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title | The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title_full | The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title_fullStr | The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title_short | The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial |
title_sort | influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extraction. a randomized clinical parallel trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abumostafanedal theinfluenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT aldaghaminsaja theinfluenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT alanaziasma theinfluenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT aljumaahnesreen theinfluenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT alnesafiamenah theinfluenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT abumostafanedal influenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT aldaghaminsaja influenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT alanaziasma influenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT aljumaahnesreen influenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial AT alnesafiamenah influenceofintraalveolarapplicationofhoneyversuschlorhexidinerinseontheincidenceofalveolarosteitisfollowingmolarteethextractionarandomizedclinicalparalleltrial |