Cargando…

Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells

OBJECTIVES: The bone tissue engineering primarily focuses on three‐dimensional co‐culture systems, which physical and biological properties resemble the cell matrix of actual tissues. The complex dialogue between bone‐forming and endothelial cells (ECs) in a tissue‐engineered construct will directly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Limei, Li, Jidong, Zou, Qin, Zuo, Yi, Cai, Bin, Li, Yubao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12658
_version_ 1783459842183135232
author Li, Limei
Li, Jidong
Zou, Qin
Zuo, Yi
Cai, Bin
Li, Yubao
author_facet Li, Limei
Li, Jidong
Zou, Qin
Zuo, Yi
Cai, Bin
Li, Yubao
author_sort Li, Limei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The bone tissue engineering primarily focuses on three‐dimensional co‐culture systems, which physical and biological properties resemble the cell matrix of actual tissues. The complex dialogue between bone‐forming and endothelial cells (ECs) in a tissue‐engineered construct will directly regulate angiogenesis and bone regeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether co‐culture between osteogenic and angiogenic cells derived by bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could affect cell activities and new bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells were dually induced to differentiate into osteogenic cells (OMSCs) and ECs; both cell types were co‐cultured at different ratios to investigate their effects and underlying mechanisms through ELISA, RT‐qPCR and MTT assays. The selected cell mixture was transplanted onto a nano‐hydroxyapatite/polyurethane (n‐HA/PU) scaffold to form a cell‐scaffold construct that was implanted in the rat femoral condyles. Histology and micro‐CT were examined for further verification. RESULTS: ELISA and gene expression studies revealed that co‐cultured OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) significantly elevated the transcription levels of osteogenic genes such as ALP, Col‐I and OCN, as well as transcription factors Msx2, Runx2 and Osterix; it also upregulated angiogenic factors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CD31 when compared with cells cultured alone or in other ratios. The optimized OMSCs/ECs group had more abundant calcium phosphate crystal deposition, further facilitated their bone formation in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The OMSCs/ECs‐scaffold constructs at an optimal cell ratio (0.5/1.5) achieved enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic factor expression and biomineralization, which resulted in more effective bone formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67975112020-03-13 Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells Li, Limei Li, Jidong Zou, Qin Zuo, Yi Cai, Bin Li, Yubao Cell Prolif Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The bone tissue engineering primarily focuses on three‐dimensional co‐culture systems, which physical and biological properties resemble the cell matrix of actual tissues. The complex dialogue between bone‐forming and endothelial cells (ECs) in a tissue‐engineered construct will directly regulate angiogenesis and bone regeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether co‐culture between osteogenic and angiogenic cells derived by bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could affect cell activities and new bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells were dually induced to differentiate into osteogenic cells (OMSCs) and ECs; both cell types were co‐cultured at different ratios to investigate their effects and underlying mechanisms through ELISA, RT‐qPCR and MTT assays. The selected cell mixture was transplanted onto a nano‐hydroxyapatite/polyurethane (n‐HA/PU) scaffold to form a cell‐scaffold construct that was implanted in the rat femoral condyles. Histology and micro‐CT were examined for further verification. RESULTS: ELISA and gene expression studies revealed that co‐cultured OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) significantly elevated the transcription levels of osteogenic genes such as ALP, Col‐I and OCN, as well as transcription factors Msx2, Runx2 and Osterix; it also upregulated angiogenic factors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CD31 when compared with cells cultured alone or in other ratios. The optimized OMSCs/ECs group had more abundant calcium phosphate crystal deposition, further facilitated their bone formation in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The OMSCs/ECs‐scaffold constructs at an optimal cell ratio (0.5/1.5) achieved enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic factor expression and biomineralization, which resulted in more effective bone formation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6797511/ /pubmed/31297910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12658 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cell Proliferation Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Limei
Li, Jidong
Zou, Qin
Zuo, Yi
Cai, Bin
Li, Yubao
Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title_full Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title_fullStr Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title_short Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured MSCs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
title_sort enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co‐cultured mscs‐derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12658
work_keys_str_mv AT lilimei enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells
AT lijidong enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells
AT zouqin enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells
AT zuoyi enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells
AT caibin enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells
AT liyubao enhancedbonetissueregenerationofabiomimeticcellularscaffoldwithcoculturedmscsderivedosteogenicandangiogeniccells