Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high‐dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. METHODS: Two re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Yining, Xu, Lingyi, Zhuang, Hongqing, Jiang, Liang, Wei, Feng, Liu, Zhongjun, Li, Yan, Yu, Miao, Ni, Kaiwen, Liu, Xiaoguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2546
_version_ 1783459854813233152
author Gong, Yining
Xu, Lingyi
Zhuang, Hongqing
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Zhongjun
Li, Yan
Yu, Miao
Ni, Kaiwen
Liu, Xiaoguang
author_facet Gong, Yining
Xu, Lingyi
Zhuang, Hongqing
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Zhongjun
Li, Yan
Yu, Miao
Ni, Kaiwen
Liu, Xiaoguang
author_sort Gong, Yining
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high‐dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. METHODS: Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non‐randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. RESULTS: The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1‐year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1‐year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1‐year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single‐fraction group and 10.1% in the multi‐fraction group. The incidence of radiation‐induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single‐fraction and multi‐fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi‐fraction SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single‐fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single‐fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi‐fraction SBRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67975632019-10-21 Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review Gong, Yining Xu, Lingyi Zhuang, Hongqing Jiang, Liang Wei, Feng Liu, Zhongjun Li, Yan Yu, Miao Ni, Kaiwen Liu, Xiaoguang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high‐dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. METHODS: Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non‐randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. RESULTS: The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1‐year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1‐year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1‐year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single‐fraction group and 10.1% in the multi‐fraction group. The incidence of radiation‐induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single‐fraction and multi‐fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi‐fraction SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single‐fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single‐fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi‐fraction SBRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6797563/ /pubmed/31489788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2546 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Gong, Yining
Xu, Lingyi
Zhuang, Hongqing
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Liu, Zhongjun
Li, Yan
Yu, Miao
Ni, Kaiwen
Liu, Xiaoguang
Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title_full Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title_short Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
title_sort efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a systematic review
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2546
work_keys_str_mv AT gongyining efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT xulingyi efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT zhuanghongqing efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT jiangliang efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT weifeng efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT liuzhongjun efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT liyan efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT yumiao efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT nikaiwen efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview
AT liuxiaoguang efficacyandsafetyofdifferentfractionsinstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforspinalmetastasesasystematicreview