Cargando…

Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal chemotherapy (CT) utilization rates can drive improvements in quality of care. We report a benchmarking approach to estimate the optimal rate of perioperative CT for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: The Ontario Cancer Registry and linked treated records...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karim, Safiya, Mackillop, William J., Brennan, Kelly, Peng, Yingwei, Siemens, D. Robert, Krzyzanowska, Monika K., Booth, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31472011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2449
_version_ 1783459857880317952
author Karim, Safiya
Mackillop, William J.
Brennan, Kelly
Peng, Yingwei
Siemens, D. Robert
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
Booth, Christopher M.
author_facet Karim, Safiya
Mackillop, William J.
Brennan, Kelly
Peng, Yingwei
Siemens, D. Robert
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
Booth, Christopher M.
author_sort Karim, Safiya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal chemotherapy (CT) utilization rates can drive improvements in quality of care. We report a benchmarking approach to estimate the optimal rate of perioperative CT for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: The Ontario Cancer Registry and linked treated records were used to identify neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT rates among patients with MIBC during 2004‐2013. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the proportion of observed rate variation that could be due to chance alone. The criterion‐based benchmarking approach was used to explore whether social and health‐system factors were associated with CT rates. We also used the “pared‐mean” approach to identify a benchmark population of hospitals with the highest treatment rates. Hospital CT rates were adjusted for case mix and simulated using a multi‐level multivariable model and a parametric bootstrapping approach. RESULTS: The study population included 2581 patients; perioperative CT was delivered to 31% (798/2581). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment was strongly associated with patient socioeconomic status and hospital teaching status. The benchmark rate was 36%. Unadjusted CT rates were significantly different across hospitals (range 0%‐52%, P < .001). The unadjusted benchmark perioperative CT rate was 45% (95% CI 40%‐50%); utilization rate in nonbenchmark hospitals was 28% (95% CI 26%‐30%). When using simulated CT rates adjusted for case mix, the benchmark CT rate was 41% (95% CI 35%‐47%) and the nonbenchmark hospital CT rate was 30% (95% CI 28%‐32%). The simulation analysis suggested that the observed component of variation (38%) was outside the 95% CI (22%‐28%) of what could be expected due to chance alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant systematic variation in perioperative CT rates for MIBC across hospitals in routine practice. The benchmark perioperative CT rate for MIBC is 36%‐41%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67975752019-10-21 Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer Karim, Safiya Mackillop, William J. Brennan, Kelly Peng, Yingwei Siemens, D. Robert Krzyzanowska, Monika K. Booth, Christopher M. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal chemotherapy (CT) utilization rates can drive improvements in quality of care. We report a benchmarking approach to estimate the optimal rate of perioperative CT for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: The Ontario Cancer Registry and linked treated records were used to identify neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT rates among patients with MIBC during 2004‐2013. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the proportion of observed rate variation that could be due to chance alone. The criterion‐based benchmarking approach was used to explore whether social and health‐system factors were associated with CT rates. We also used the “pared‐mean” approach to identify a benchmark population of hospitals with the highest treatment rates. Hospital CT rates were adjusted for case mix and simulated using a multi‐level multivariable model and a parametric bootstrapping approach. RESULTS: The study population included 2581 patients; perioperative CT was delivered to 31% (798/2581). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment was strongly associated with patient socioeconomic status and hospital teaching status. The benchmark rate was 36%. Unadjusted CT rates were significantly different across hospitals (range 0%‐52%, P < .001). The unadjusted benchmark perioperative CT rate was 45% (95% CI 40%‐50%); utilization rate in nonbenchmark hospitals was 28% (95% CI 26%‐30%). When using simulated CT rates adjusted for case mix, the benchmark CT rate was 41% (95% CI 35%‐47%) and the nonbenchmark hospital CT rate was 30% (95% CI 28%‐32%). The simulation analysis suggested that the observed component of variation (38%) was outside the 95% CI (22%‐28%) of what could be expected due to chance alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant systematic variation in perioperative CT rates for MIBC across hospitals in routine practice. The benchmark perioperative CT rate for MIBC is 36%‐41%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6797575/ /pubmed/31472011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2449 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Karim, Safiya
Mackillop, William J.
Brennan, Kelly
Peng, Yingwei
Siemens, D. Robert
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
Booth, Christopher M.
Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title_full Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title_fullStr Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title_short Estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
title_sort estimating the optimal perioperative chemotherapy utilization rate for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31472011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2449
work_keys_str_mv AT karimsafiya estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT mackillopwilliamj estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT brennankelly estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT pengyingwei estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT siemensdrobert estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT krzyzanowskamonikak estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT boothchristopherm estimatingtheoptimalperioperativechemotherapyutilizationrateformuscleinvasivebladdercancer