Cargando…

Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia

Progressive naming impairment (i.e., anomia) is a core diagnostic symptom of numerous pathologies that impact anterior and inferior portions of the temporal lobe. For patients who experience such regional temporal lobe degeneration, patterns of language loss often parallel the degradation of semanti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ungrady, Molly B., Flurie, Maurice, Zuckerman, Bonnie M., Mirman, Daniel, Reilly, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31680908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00354
_version_ 1783459861450719232
author Ungrady, Molly B.
Flurie, Maurice
Zuckerman, Bonnie M.
Mirman, Daniel
Reilly, Jamie
author_facet Ungrady, Molly B.
Flurie, Maurice
Zuckerman, Bonnie M.
Mirman, Daniel
Reilly, Jamie
author_sort Ungrady, Molly B.
collection PubMed
description Progressive naming impairment (i.e., anomia) is a core diagnostic symptom of numerous pathologies that impact anterior and inferior portions of the temporal lobe. For patients who experience such regional temporal lobe degeneration, patterns of language loss often parallel the degradation of semantic memory, an etiology of naming impairment known as semantic anomia. Previous studies of semantic anomia have focused extensively on the output of naming attempts by contrasting errors, omissions, and distortions as a function of item-level characteristics (e.g., prototypicality, semantic category). An alternative approach involves evaluating visual confrontation naming as the naming process unfolds. Techniques with high temporal resolution (e.g., eyetracking) offer a potentially sensitive mode of delineating the locus of impairment during naming. For example, a lexical retrieval disorder would hypothetically elicit normal gaze patterns associated with successful visual object recognition regardless of naming accuracy. In contrast, we hypothesize that semantic anomia would be distinguished by aberrant gaze patterns as a function of reduced top-down conceptually guided search. Here we examined visual object recognition during picture confrontation naming by contrasting gaze patterns time locked to stimulus onset. Patients included a cohort of patients with anomia associated with either primary progressive aphasia (N = 9) or Alzheimer’s disease (N = 1) who attempted to name 200 pictures over the course of 18–24 months. We retrospectively isolated correct and incorrect naming attempts and contrasted gaze patterns for accurate vs. inaccurate attempts to discern whether gaze patterns are predictive of language forgetting. Patients tended to show a lower fixation count, higher saccade count, and slower saccade velocity for items that were named incorrectly. These results hold promise for the utility of eyetracking as a diagnostic and therapeutic index of language functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67975892019-11-01 Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia Ungrady, Molly B. Flurie, Maurice Zuckerman, Bonnie M. Mirman, Daniel Reilly, Jamie Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Progressive naming impairment (i.e., anomia) is a core diagnostic symptom of numerous pathologies that impact anterior and inferior portions of the temporal lobe. For patients who experience such regional temporal lobe degeneration, patterns of language loss often parallel the degradation of semantic memory, an etiology of naming impairment known as semantic anomia. Previous studies of semantic anomia have focused extensively on the output of naming attempts by contrasting errors, omissions, and distortions as a function of item-level characteristics (e.g., prototypicality, semantic category). An alternative approach involves evaluating visual confrontation naming as the naming process unfolds. Techniques with high temporal resolution (e.g., eyetracking) offer a potentially sensitive mode of delineating the locus of impairment during naming. For example, a lexical retrieval disorder would hypothetically elicit normal gaze patterns associated with successful visual object recognition regardless of naming accuracy. In contrast, we hypothesize that semantic anomia would be distinguished by aberrant gaze patterns as a function of reduced top-down conceptually guided search. Here we examined visual object recognition during picture confrontation naming by contrasting gaze patterns time locked to stimulus onset. Patients included a cohort of patients with anomia associated with either primary progressive aphasia (N = 9) or Alzheimer’s disease (N = 1) who attempted to name 200 pictures over the course of 18–24 months. We retrospectively isolated correct and incorrect naming attempts and contrasted gaze patterns for accurate vs. inaccurate attempts to discern whether gaze patterns are predictive of language forgetting. Patients tended to show a lower fixation count, higher saccade count, and slower saccade velocity for items that were named incorrectly. These results hold promise for the utility of eyetracking as a diagnostic and therapeutic index of language functioning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6797589/ /pubmed/31680908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00354 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ungrady, Flurie, Zuckerman, Mirman and Reilly. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ungrady, Molly B.
Flurie, Maurice
Zuckerman, Bonnie M.
Mirman, Daniel
Reilly, Jamie
Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title_full Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title_fullStr Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title_short Naming and Knowing Revisited: Eyetracking Correlates of Anomia in Progressive Aphasia
title_sort naming and knowing revisited: eyetracking correlates of anomia in progressive aphasia
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31680908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00354
work_keys_str_mv AT ungradymollyb namingandknowingrevisitedeyetrackingcorrelatesofanomiainprogressiveaphasia
AT fluriemaurice namingandknowingrevisitedeyetrackingcorrelatesofanomiainprogressiveaphasia
AT zuckermanbonniem namingandknowingrevisitedeyetrackingcorrelatesofanomiainprogressiveaphasia
AT mirmandaniel namingandknowingrevisitedeyetrackingcorrelatesofanomiainprogressiveaphasia
AT reillyjamie namingandknowingrevisitedeyetrackingcorrelatesofanomiainprogressiveaphasia