Cargando…
The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y |
_version_ | 1783459876738957312 |
---|---|
author | Elmer, Timon Chaitanya, Krishna Purwar, Prateek Stadtfeld, Christoph |
author_facet | Elmer, Timon Chaitanya, Krishna Purwar, Prateek Stadtfeld, Christoph |
author_sort | Elmer, Timon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)—resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67976502019-11-01 The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions Elmer, Timon Chaitanya, Krishna Purwar, Prateek Stadtfeld, Christoph Behav Res Methods Article Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)—resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity). Springer US 2019-04-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6797650/ /pubmed/30997659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Elmer, Timon Chaitanya, Krishna Purwar, Prateek Stadtfeld, Christoph The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title | The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title_full | The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title_fullStr | The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title_short | The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
title_sort | validity of rfid badges measuring face-to-face interactions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmertimon thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT chaitanyakrishna thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT purwarprateek thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT stadtfeldchristoph thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT elmertimon validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT chaitanyakrishna validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT purwarprateek validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions AT stadtfeldchristoph validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions |