Cargando…

The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions

Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmer, Timon, Chaitanya, Krishna, Purwar, Prateek, Stadtfeld, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y
_version_ 1783459876738957312
author Elmer, Timon
Chaitanya, Krishna
Purwar, Prateek
Stadtfeld, Christoph
author_facet Elmer, Timon
Chaitanya, Krishna
Purwar, Prateek
Stadtfeld, Christoph
author_sort Elmer, Timon
collection PubMed
description Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)—resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67976502019-11-01 The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions Elmer, Timon Chaitanya, Krishna Purwar, Prateek Stadtfeld, Christoph Behav Res Methods Article Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)—resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity). Springer US 2019-04-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6797650/ /pubmed/30997659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Elmer, Timon
Chaitanya, Krishna
Purwar, Prateek
Stadtfeld, Christoph
The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title_full The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title_fullStr The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title_full_unstemmed The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title_short The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions
title_sort validity of rfid badges measuring face-to-face interactions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y
work_keys_str_mv AT elmertimon thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT chaitanyakrishna thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT purwarprateek thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT stadtfeldchristoph thevalidityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT elmertimon validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT chaitanyakrishna validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT purwarprateek validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions
AT stadtfeldchristoph validityofrfidbadgesmeasuringfacetofaceinteractions