Cargando…
Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan
Controversy still remains regarding the optimal criteria for selecting damage control surgery (DCS). Our objective was to propose an indication for implementing DCS for abdominal trauma requiring emergency laparotomy. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study that used data from the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51436-x |
_version_ | 1783459897886638080 |
---|---|
author | Urushibata, Nao Murata, Kiyoshi Otomo, Yasuhiro |
author_facet | Urushibata, Nao Murata, Kiyoshi Otomo, Yasuhiro |
author_sort | Urushibata, Nao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Controversy still remains regarding the optimal criteria for selecting damage control surgery (DCS). Our objective was to propose an indication for implementing DCS for abdominal trauma requiring emergency laparotomy. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study that used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Patients who underwent emergency laparotomy were included. We compared the patients regarding the performance of DCS. Of the 4447 patients included in the study, 532 patients were in the DCS group and 3915 patients were in the non-DCS group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that body temperature, level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale), and type of injury (blunt or penetrating) were independent predictors of DCS. Using these predictors, we created the Damage Control Indication Detecting score. The score showed a positive correlation with mortality. The score was obtained as 5 of 9 points in total, revealing mortality of 30.8%, sensitivity of 64.8%, and specificity of 70.0%. The area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.715. This score can help surgeons determine when to perform DCS. However, more than 95% of trauma cases in Japan involve blunt injuries, suggesting that the results of our study may not be applicable internationally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6797741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67977412019-10-25 Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan Urushibata, Nao Murata, Kiyoshi Otomo, Yasuhiro Sci Rep Article Controversy still remains regarding the optimal criteria for selecting damage control surgery (DCS). Our objective was to propose an indication for implementing DCS for abdominal trauma requiring emergency laparotomy. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study that used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Patients who underwent emergency laparotomy were included. We compared the patients regarding the performance of DCS. Of the 4447 patients included in the study, 532 patients were in the DCS group and 3915 patients were in the non-DCS group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that body temperature, level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale), and type of injury (blunt or penetrating) were independent predictors of DCS. Using these predictors, we created the Damage Control Indication Detecting score. The score showed a positive correlation with mortality. The score was obtained as 5 of 9 points in total, revealing mortality of 30.8%, sensitivity of 64.8%, and specificity of 70.0%. The area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.715. This score can help surgeons determine when to perform DCS. However, more than 95% of trauma cases in Japan involve blunt injuries, suggesting that the results of our study may not be applicable internationally. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6797741/ /pubmed/31624272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51436-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Urushibata, Nao Murata, Kiyoshi Otomo, Yasuhiro Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title | Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title_full | Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title_fullStr | Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title_short | Decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in Japan |
title_sort | decision-making criteria for damage control surgery in japan |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51436-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urushibatanao decisionmakingcriteriafordamagecontrolsurgeryinjapan AT muratakiyoshi decisionmakingcriteriafordamagecontrolsurgeryinjapan AT otomoyasuhiro decisionmakingcriteriafordamagecontrolsurgeryinjapan |