Cargando…

Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota

The gut has the largest commensal bacterial population in the body and its composition can be impacted by host factors such as production of immunoglobulin A (IgA). Eosinophils in the gut have been implicated in the production of antibacterial factors and maintenance of IgA‐secreting plasma cells. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Gurdeep, Brass, Andrew, Knight, Christopher G., Cruickshank, Sheena M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31433857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13110
_version_ 1783459930069532672
author Singh, Gurdeep
Brass, Andrew
Knight, Christopher G.
Cruickshank, Sheena M.
author_facet Singh, Gurdeep
Brass, Andrew
Knight, Christopher G.
Cruickshank, Sheena M.
author_sort Singh, Gurdeep
collection PubMed
description The gut has the largest commensal bacterial population in the body and its composition can be impacted by host factors such as production of immunoglobulin A (IgA). Eosinophils in the gut have been implicated in the production of antibacterial factors and maintenance of IgA‐secreting plasma cells. We used an eosinophil‐deficient mouse (∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−)) and littermate controls to investigate the role of eosinophils in the regulation of the microbiota, with particular emphasis on mucus‐resident species in the small and large intestine. We found no differences in IgA production or IgA‐expressing plasma cells between naive littermates in the small or large intestine. However, denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis revealed differences in the bacterial communities of the mucus and stools between wild‐type mice and ∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−) mice, with the greatest separation between the mucus microbial communities. Mucus‐resident bacteria in ∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−) mice had reduced diversity in the mucus compared with the stools. A quantitative PCR panel of selected bacteria showed that the most significant differences in the microbiota were between mucus‐resident bacteria and those in stool, such as the abundance of Clostridiales and Bacteroides. Our data implicate eosinophils in the regulation of the microbiota, especially the bacteria most hyperlocal to the gut barrier. Although we see differences between host genotypes in the overall microbial communities, further work is required to establish specifically which bacteria are different between these groups. Most importantly, the data revealed that the mucus and stool microbiota are discrete communities. Stool analysis alone may be insufficient to comprehensively explore and define the role of the gut microbiota in health and disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6797872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67978722019-10-21 Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota Singh, Gurdeep Brass, Andrew Knight, Christopher G. Cruickshank, Sheena M. Immunology Original Articles The gut has the largest commensal bacterial population in the body and its composition can be impacted by host factors such as production of immunoglobulin A (IgA). Eosinophils in the gut have been implicated in the production of antibacterial factors and maintenance of IgA‐secreting plasma cells. We used an eosinophil‐deficient mouse (∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−)) and littermate controls to investigate the role of eosinophils in the regulation of the microbiota, with particular emphasis on mucus‐resident species in the small and large intestine. We found no differences in IgA production or IgA‐expressing plasma cells between naive littermates in the small or large intestine. However, denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis revealed differences in the bacterial communities of the mucus and stools between wild‐type mice and ∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−) mice, with the greatest separation between the mucus microbial communities. Mucus‐resident bacteria in ∆dblGATA‐1 (−/−) mice had reduced diversity in the mucus compared with the stools. A quantitative PCR panel of selected bacteria showed that the most significant differences in the microbiota were between mucus‐resident bacteria and those in stool, such as the abundance of Clostridiales and Bacteroides. Our data implicate eosinophils in the regulation of the microbiota, especially the bacteria most hyperlocal to the gut barrier. Although we see differences between host genotypes in the overall microbial communities, further work is required to establish specifically which bacteria are different between these groups. Most importantly, the data revealed that the mucus and stool microbiota are discrete communities. Stool analysis alone may be insufficient to comprehensively explore and define the role of the gut microbiota in health and disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-17 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6797872/ /pubmed/31433857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13110 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Singh, Gurdeep
Brass, Andrew
Knight, Christopher G.
Cruickshank, Sheena M.
Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title_full Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title_fullStr Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title_short Gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
title_sort gut eosinophils and their impact on the mucus‐resident microbiota
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31433857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13110
work_keys_str_mv AT singhgurdeep guteosinophilsandtheirimpactonthemucusresidentmicrobiota
AT brassandrew guteosinophilsandtheirimpactonthemucusresidentmicrobiota
AT knightchristopherg guteosinophilsandtheirimpactonthemucusresidentmicrobiota
AT cruickshanksheenam guteosinophilsandtheirimpactonthemucusresidentmicrobiota