Cargando…

Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)

BACKGROUND: The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial (MARS 2) aims to evaluate a surgical procedure by comparing chemotherapy and surgery against chemotherapy alone. The pilot study for MARS 2 evaluated the viability of recruitment. Challenges have been reported in conducting clinical research int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warnock, Clare, Lord, Karen, Taylor, Bethany, Tod, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3692-x
_version_ 1783460012144721920
author Warnock, Clare
Lord, Karen
Taylor, Bethany
Tod, Angela
author_facet Warnock, Clare
Lord, Karen
Taylor, Bethany
Tod, Angela
author_sort Warnock, Clare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial (MARS 2) aims to evaluate a surgical procedure by comparing chemotherapy and surgery against chemotherapy alone. The pilot study for MARS 2 evaluated the viability of recruitment. Challenges have been reported in conducting clinical research into thoracic surgical treatments and evidence is required to improve our understanding of patient experiences of trial procedures, trial treatments and the factors that influence participation. METHODS: This longitudinal qualitative study was nested within the MARS 2 pilot. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 participants in the MARS 2 trial. Interviews were conducted post-randomisation, post-surgery (surgery arm) and at 6 and 12 months. Altogether, 41 interviews were carried out. The data were analysed using framework techniques. RESULTS: Challenges were identified regarding the volume and complexity of information given to participants, and their understanding of clinical equipoise and randomisation. Factors influencing participation included having an opportunity to undergo surgery, a self-assessment of their ability to cope with trial treatments, maintaining a positive approach and altruism. Obstacles included the logistics of traveling for treatment in an unfamiliar setting. Negative consequences of trial participation included increased uncertainty amplified by multiple care providers and unclear transition arrangements after the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Participants’ descriptions provided insights that have implications for care for mesothelioma trial patients. The need for healthcare staff to be alert to the potential for misunderstanding, particularly when presenting treatment options, was identified. Patients perceived and derived benefits from taking part in the trial but experienced some negative consequences. These should be anticipated and managed proactively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02040272. Registered on 20 January 2014. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67983362019-10-21 Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2) Warnock, Clare Lord, Karen Taylor, Bethany Tod, Angela Trials Research BACKGROUND: The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial (MARS 2) aims to evaluate a surgical procedure by comparing chemotherapy and surgery against chemotherapy alone. The pilot study for MARS 2 evaluated the viability of recruitment. Challenges have been reported in conducting clinical research into thoracic surgical treatments and evidence is required to improve our understanding of patient experiences of trial procedures, trial treatments and the factors that influence participation. METHODS: This longitudinal qualitative study was nested within the MARS 2 pilot. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 participants in the MARS 2 trial. Interviews were conducted post-randomisation, post-surgery (surgery arm) and at 6 and 12 months. Altogether, 41 interviews were carried out. The data were analysed using framework techniques. RESULTS: Challenges were identified regarding the volume and complexity of information given to participants, and their understanding of clinical equipoise and randomisation. Factors influencing participation included having an opportunity to undergo surgery, a self-assessment of their ability to cope with trial treatments, maintaining a positive approach and altruism. Obstacles included the logistics of traveling for treatment in an unfamiliar setting. Negative consequences of trial participation included increased uncertainty amplified by multiple care providers and unclear transition arrangements after the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Participants’ descriptions provided insights that have implications for care for mesothelioma trial patients. The need for healthcare staff to be alert to the potential for misunderstanding, particularly when presenting treatment options, was identified. Patients perceived and derived benefits from taking part in the trial but experienced some negative consequences. These should be anticipated and managed proactively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02040272. Registered on 20 January 2014.  BioMed Central 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6798336/ /pubmed/31627746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3692-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Warnock, Clare
Lord, Karen
Taylor, Bethany
Tod, Angela
Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title_full Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title_fullStr Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title_full_unstemmed Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title_short Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)
title_sort patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the mesothelioma and radical surgery trial 2 (mars 2)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3692-x
work_keys_str_mv AT warnockclare patientexperiencesofparticipationinaradicalthoracicsurgicaltrialfindingsfromthemesotheliomaandradicalsurgerytrial2mars2
AT lordkaren patientexperiencesofparticipationinaradicalthoracicsurgicaltrialfindingsfromthemesotheliomaandradicalsurgerytrial2mars2
AT taylorbethany patientexperiencesofparticipationinaradicalthoracicsurgicaltrialfindingsfromthemesotheliomaandradicalsurgerytrial2mars2
AT todangela patientexperiencesofparticipationinaradicalthoracicsurgicaltrialfindingsfromthemesotheliomaandradicalsurgerytrial2mars2