Cargando…

Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?

BACKGROUND: Within the last years, the interest in physical exercise as non-invasive stimulus influencing circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (CPC) concentrations has constantly grown. Cell estimates are often derived by determining the subgroup of CPC as percent lymphocytes (LYM) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kröpfl, Julia M., Schmid, Michelle, Di Marzio, Yvonne, Schreiber, Karine, Spengler, Christina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1403-x
_version_ 1783460015889186816
author Kröpfl, Julia M.
Schmid, Michelle
Di Marzio, Yvonne
Schreiber, Karine
Spengler, Christina M.
author_facet Kröpfl, Julia M.
Schmid, Michelle
Di Marzio, Yvonne
Schreiber, Karine
Spengler, Christina M.
author_sort Kröpfl, Julia M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the last years, the interest in physical exercise as non-invasive stimulus influencing circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (CPC) concentrations has constantly grown. Cell estimates are often derived by determining the subgroup of CPC as percent lymphocytes (LYM) or mononuclear cells (MNC) via flow cytometry and back calculation over whole blood (WB) cell counts. However, results might depend on the used cell isolation technique and/or gating strategy. We aimed to investigate MNC loss and apoptosis during the flow cytometry sample preparation process preceded by either density gradient centrifugation (DGC) or red blood cell lysis (RBCL) and the potential difference between results derived from back calculation at different stages of cell isolation and from WB. METHODS: Human blood was subjected to DGC and RBCL. Samples were stained for flow cytometry analysis of CPC (CD34+/CD45dim) and apoptosis analysis (Annexin V) of MNC and CPC subsets. MNC and LYM gating strategies were compared. RESULTS: Both DGC as well as RBCL yielded comparable CPC concentrations independent of the gating strategy when back calculated over WB values. However, cell loss and apoptosis differed between techniques, where after DGC LYM, and monocyte (MONO) concentrations significantly decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), while after RBCL LYM concentrations significantly decreased (p < 0.05) and MONO concentrations increased (p < 0.001). LYM apoptosis was comparable between techniques, but MONO apoptosis was higher after DGC than RBCL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Investigated MNC counts (LYM/MONO ratio) after cell isolation and staining did not always mimic WB conditions. Thus, final CPC results should be corrected accordingly, especially when reporting live CPC concentrations after DGC; otherwise, the CPC regenerative potential in circulation could be biased. This is of high importance in the context of non-invasively induced CPC mobilization such as by acute physical exercise, since these cell changes are small and conclusions drawn from published results might affect further applications of physical exercise as non-invasive therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67983452019-10-21 Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted? Kröpfl, Julia M. Schmid, Michelle Di Marzio, Yvonne Schreiber, Karine Spengler, Christina M. Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Within the last years, the interest in physical exercise as non-invasive stimulus influencing circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (CPC) concentrations has constantly grown. Cell estimates are often derived by determining the subgroup of CPC as percent lymphocytes (LYM) or mononuclear cells (MNC) via flow cytometry and back calculation over whole blood (WB) cell counts. However, results might depend on the used cell isolation technique and/or gating strategy. We aimed to investigate MNC loss and apoptosis during the flow cytometry sample preparation process preceded by either density gradient centrifugation (DGC) or red blood cell lysis (RBCL) and the potential difference between results derived from back calculation at different stages of cell isolation and from WB. METHODS: Human blood was subjected to DGC and RBCL. Samples were stained for flow cytometry analysis of CPC (CD34+/CD45dim) and apoptosis analysis (Annexin V) of MNC and CPC subsets. MNC and LYM gating strategies were compared. RESULTS: Both DGC as well as RBCL yielded comparable CPC concentrations independent of the gating strategy when back calculated over WB values. However, cell loss and apoptosis differed between techniques, where after DGC LYM, and monocyte (MONO) concentrations significantly decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), while after RBCL LYM concentrations significantly decreased (p < 0.05) and MONO concentrations increased (p < 0.001). LYM apoptosis was comparable between techniques, but MONO apoptosis was higher after DGC than RBCL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Investigated MNC counts (LYM/MONO ratio) after cell isolation and staining did not always mimic WB conditions. Thus, final CPC results should be corrected accordingly, especially when reporting live CPC concentrations after DGC; otherwise, the CPC regenerative potential in circulation could be biased. This is of high importance in the context of non-invasively induced CPC mobilization such as by acute physical exercise, since these cell changes are small and conclusions drawn from published results might affect further applications of physical exercise as non-invasive therapy. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6798345/ /pubmed/31623690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1403-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kröpfl, Julia M.
Schmid, Michelle
Di Marzio, Yvonne
Schreiber, Karine
Spengler, Christina M.
Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title_full Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title_fullStr Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title_full_unstemmed Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title_short Circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
title_sort circulating adult stem and progenitor cell numbers—can results be trusted?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1403-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kropfljuliam circulatingadultstemandprogenitorcellnumberscanresultsbetrusted
AT schmidmichelle circulatingadultstemandprogenitorcellnumberscanresultsbetrusted
AT dimarzioyvonne circulatingadultstemandprogenitorcellnumberscanresultsbetrusted
AT schreiberkarine circulatingadultstemandprogenitorcellnumberscanresultsbetrusted
AT spenglerchristinam circulatingadultstemandprogenitorcellnumberscanresultsbetrusted