Cargando…

Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern of self...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadum, Elin Anita, Strand, Leif Åge, Martinussen, Monica, Breidvik, Laila, Isaksen, Nina, Borud, Einar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4
_version_ 1783460031461588992
author Fadum, Elin Anita
Strand, Leif Åge
Martinussen, Monica
Breidvik, Laila
Isaksen, Nina
Borud, Einar
author_facet Fadum, Elin Anita
Strand, Leif Åge
Martinussen, Monica
Breidvik, Laila
Isaksen, Nina
Borud, Einar
author_sort Fadum, Elin Anita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern of self-reported health in military personnel could generate hypotheses for future research on the possible associations between gender and health. However, such studies are rare and limited to a few countries. The aim of this study was to examine self-reported physical and mental health in Norwegian military women. METHODS: We compared responses on self-reported health of 1068 active duty military women in Norway to those of active duty military men (n = 8100). Further, we compared the military women to civilian women working in the Norwegian Armed Forces (n = 1081). Participants were stratified into three age groups: 20–29; 30–39; and 40–60 years. We used Pearson Chi-square tests, Students t-tests and regression models to assess differences between the groups. RESULTS: The military women in our study reported physical illness and injuries equal to those of military men, but more military women used pain relieving and psychotropic drugs. More military women aged 20–29 and 30–39 years reported mental health issues than military men of the same age. In the age group 30–39 years, twice as many military women assessed their health as poor compared to military men. In the age group 40–60 years, more military women than men reported musculoskeletal pain. Military women used less smokeless tobacco than military men, but there were few differences in alcohol consumption and smoking. Military women appeared to be more physically healthy than civilian women, but we found few differences in mental health between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Most military women reported physical symptoms equal to those of military men, but there were differences between the genders in mental health and drug use. More favourable health compared to civilian women was most evident in the youngest age group and did not apply to mental health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67984072019-10-21 Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study Fadum, Elin Anita Strand, Leif Åge Martinussen, Monica Breidvik, Laila Isaksen, Nina Borud, Einar BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern of self-reported health in military personnel could generate hypotheses for future research on the possible associations between gender and health. However, such studies are rare and limited to a few countries. The aim of this study was to examine self-reported physical and mental health in Norwegian military women. METHODS: We compared responses on self-reported health of 1068 active duty military women in Norway to those of active duty military men (n = 8100). Further, we compared the military women to civilian women working in the Norwegian Armed Forces (n = 1081). Participants were stratified into three age groups: 20–29; 30–39; and 40–60 years. We used Pearson Chi-square tests, Students t-tests and regression models to assess differences between the groups. RESULTS: The military women in our study reported physical illness and injuries equal to those of military men, but more military women used pain relieving and psychotropic drugs. More military women aged 20–29 and 30–39 years reported mental health issues than military men of the same age. In the age group 30–39 years, twice as many military women assessed their health as poor compared to military men. In the age group 40–60 years, more military women than men reported musculoskeletal pain. Military women used less smokeless tobacco than military men, but there were few differences in alcohol consumption and smoking. Military women appeared to be more physically healthy than civilian women, but we found few differences in mental health between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Most military women reported physical symptoms equal to those of military men, but there were differences between the genders in mental health and drug use. More favourable health compared to civilian women was most evident in the youngest age group and did not apply to mental health. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6798407/ /pubmed/31623632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fadum, Elin Anita
Strand, Leif Åge
Martinussen, Monica
Breidvik, Laila
Isaksen, Nina
Borud, Einar
Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_short Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fadumelinanita fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT strandleifage fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT martinussenmonica fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT breidviklaila fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT isaksennina fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT borudeinar fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy