Cargando…

The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas

The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christians, Arne, Adel-Horowski, Antonia, Banan, Rouzbeh, Lehmann, Ulrich, Bartels, Stephan, Behling, Felix, Barrantes-Freer, Alonso, Stadelmann, Christine, Rohde, Veit, Stockhammer, Florian, Hartmann, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0
_version_ 1783460036945641472
author Christians, Arne
Adel-Horowski, Antonia
Banan, Rouzbeh
Lehmann, Ulrich
Bartels, Stephan
Behling, Felix
Barrantes-Freer, Alonso
Stadelmann, Christine
Rohde, Veit
Stockhammer, Florian
Hartmann, Christian
author_facet Christians, Arne
Adel-Horowski, Antonia
Banan, Rouzbeh
Lehmann, Ulrich
Bartels, Stephan
Behling, Felix
Barrantes-Freer, Alonso
Stadelmann, Christine
Rohde, Veit
Stockhammer, Florian
Hartmann, Christian
author_sort Christians, Arne
collection PubMed
description The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria ‘necrosis’ and ‘vascular proliferation’ actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67984252019-10-21 The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas Christians, Arne Adel-Horowski, Antonia Banan, Rouzbeh Lehmann, Ulrich Bartels, Stephan Behling, Felix Barrantes-Freer, Alonso Stadelmann, Christine Rohde, Veit Stockhammer, Florian Hartmann, Christian Acta Neuropathol Commun Research The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria ‘necrosis’ and ‘vascular proliferation’ actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6798425/ /pubmed/31623667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Christians, Arne
Adel-Horowski, Antonia
Banan, Rouzbeh
Lehmann, Ulrich
Bartels, Stephan
Behling, Felix
Barrantes-Freer, Alonso
Stadelmann, Christine
Rohde, Veit
Stockhammer, Florian
Hartmann, Christian
The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title_full The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title_fullStr The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title_short The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
title_sort prognostic role of idh mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0
work_keys_str_mv AT christiansarne theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT adelhorowskiantonia theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT bananrouzbeh theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT lehmannulrich theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT bartelsstephan theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT behlingfelix theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT barrantesfreeralonso theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT stadelmannchristine theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT rohdeveit theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT stockhammerflorian theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT hartmannchristian theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT christiansarne prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT adelhorowskiantonia prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT bananrouzbeh prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT lehmannulrich prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT bartelsstephan prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT behlingfelix prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT barrantesfreeralonso prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT stadelmannchristine prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT rohdeveit prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT stockhammerflorian prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas
AT hartmannchristian prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas