Cargando…
The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas
The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0 |
_version_ | 1783460036945641472 |
---|---|
author | Christians, Arne Adel-Horowski, Antonia Banan, Rouzbeh Lehmann, Ulrich Bartels, Stephan Behling, Felix Barrantes-Freer, Alonso Stadelmann, Christine Rohde, Veit Stockhammer, Florian Hartmann, Christian |
author_facet | Christians, Arne Adel-Horowski, Antonia Banan, Rouzbeh Lehmann, Ulrich Bartels, Stephan Behling, Felix Barrantes-Freer, Alonso Stadelmann, Christine Rohde, Veit Stockhammer, Florian Hartmann, Christian |
author_sort | Christians, Arne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria ‘necrosis’ and ‘vascular proliferation’ actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6798425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67984252019-10-21 The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas Christians, Arne Adel-Horowski, Antonia Banan, Rouzbeh Lehmann, Ulrich Bartels, Stephan Behling, Felix Barrantes-Freer, Alonso Stadelmann, Christine Rohde, Veit Stockhammer, Florian Hartmann, Christian Acta Neuropathol Commun Research The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria ‘necrosis’ and ‘vascular proliferation’ actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective. BioMed Central 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6798425/ /pubmed/31623667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Christians, Arne Adel-Horowski, Antonia Banan, Rouzbeh Lehmann, Ulrich Bartels, Stephan Behling, Felix Barrantes-Freer, Alonso Stadelmann, Christine Rohde, Veit Stockhammer, Florian Hartmann, Christian The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title | The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title_full | The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title_fullStr | The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title_short | The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
title_sort | prognostic role of idh mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0817-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christiansarne theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT adelhorowskiantonia theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT bananrouzbeh theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT lehmannulrich theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT bartelsstephan theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT behlingfelix theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT barrantesfreeralonso theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT stadelmannchristine theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT rohdeveit theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT stockhammerflorian theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT hartmannchristian theprognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT christiansarne prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT adelhorowskiantonia prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT bananrouzbeh prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT lehmannulrich prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT bartelsstephan prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT behlingfelix prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT barrantesfreeralonso prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT stadelmannchristine prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT rohdeveit prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT stockhammerflorian prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas AT hartmannchristian prognosticroleofidhmutationsinhomogeneouslytreatedpatientswithanaplasticastrocytomasandglioblastomas |