Cargando…

The SMART IRB platform: A national resource for IRB review for multisite studies

Single institutional review board (IRB) review of multisite research increased in frequency over a decade ago with a proliferation of master IRB reliance agreements supporting statewide and regional consortia and disease- and population-specific networks. Although successful, the increasing number o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Cobb, Nichelle, Witte, Elizabeth, Cervone, Maria, Kirby, Aaron, MacFadden, Douglas, Nadler, Lee, Bierer, Barbara E.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:	Special Communications
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.394

Ejemplares similares

Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
por: Green, Jonathan M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review
por: Serdoz, Emily Sheffer, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis
por: Shoenbill, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011)

Resources to assist in the transition to a single IRB model for multisite clinical trials
por: Hahn, Cynthia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

4186 Single IRB and the CTSI: Liaison Model for the IRB Reliance Process
por: Caldwell, Christine Sego, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Dairis Rihards Irbe
por: Irbe, Dairis Rihards
Publicado: (2023)

Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers’ experiences and perceptions
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of SmartIRB Does Not Reduce IRB Review Time in a Non-federally Funded, Multi-Site Malnutrition Study
por: Lamers-Johnson, Erin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Principal Investigator Views of the IRB System
por: Whitney, Simon N., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The IRB structure and medical research reform
por: Babyar, Julie
Publicado: (2018)

Key lessons and strategies for implementing single IRB review in the Trial Innovation Network
por: Johnson, Ann R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Ethics Police?: IRBs' Views Concerning Their Power
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011)

IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens
por: Goldenberg, Aaron J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research
por: Kim, Won Oak
Publicado: (2012)

From anonymity to “open doors”: IRB responses to tensions with researchers
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2012)

Using Central IRBs for Multicenter Clinical Trials in the United States
por: Flynn, Kathryn E., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

2030: “Understandable to the subject”: Plain language IRB informed consents
por: Moore, Tina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
por: Moodley, Keymanthri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Developing a classification system and algorithm to track community-engaged research using IRB protocols at a large research university
por: Zimmerman, Emily B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Research Ethics Boards: No Data on Quality of For-Profit or Non-Profit IRBs
por: Shamoo, Adil E, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle
por: Chodos, Anna H, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants
por: Gliwa, Catherine, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT
por: Tamariz, Leonardo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Big Data, Biomedical Research, and Ethics Review: New Challenges for IRBs
por: Ferretti, Agata, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Using single IRB consultations to meet the educational needs of investigative teams
por: Johnson, Ann R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
por: Stoffel, Brandy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

IRB review points for studies utilizing paraffin blocks archived in the pathology laboratory
por: Kim, Yong-Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A snapshot of U.S. IRB review of COVID-19 research in the early pandemic
por: Taylor, Holly A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A Framework for Navigating Institutional Review Board (IRB) Oversight in the Complicated Zone of Research
por: Parker, Gretchen E
Publicado: (2016)

EHR phenotyping for research recruitment: Researcher, IRB, and physician perspectives on approaches to contacting patients
por: Beskow, Laura M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Stakeholder Experiences with the Single IRB Review Process and Recommendations for Food and Drug Administration Guidance
por: Corneli, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

“Members of the Same Club”: Challenges and Decisions Faced by US IRBs in Identifying and Managing Conflicts of Interest
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011)

Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution’s experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements
por: Willis, Alexander R., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

167 Implementing a Community Researcher IRB Certification Through a Community-Engaged Approach
por: Ott, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Corrigendum: IRB Approval Number Correction. Cardiac Dysfunction in Association with Increased Inflammatory Markers in Primary Aldosteronism
por: Lim, Jung Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Matching enrolled trial participants to disease demographics: Using IRB submissions to identify opportunities for researcher training
por: Eckstrom, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

3202 Columbia University’s Personalized IRB Liaison Service: Evaluation over its initial 2.5 years
por: Green, Nancy, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A New Ethical Challenge for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)/Ethics Committees (ECs) in the Assessment of Pediatric Clinical Trials
por: Rose, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_obufidm12mgq5fegjk29sgqb6h