Cargando…
Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27 |
_version_ | 1783460065507803136 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Kolb, H. Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Champagne, Ellen Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Hahn, Jordan Roth, Mary-Tara Ennever, Fanny Bajwa, Wajeeh Singh, Meher Homish, Gregory G. Dubocovich, Margarita L. |
author_facet | Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Kolb, H. Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Champagne, Ellen Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Hahn, Jordan Roth, Mary-Tara Ennever, Fanny Bajwa, Wajeeh Singh, Meher Homish, Gregory G. Dubocovich, Margarita L. |
author_sort | Murphy, Susan L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted. RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later. DISCUSSION: The course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6798520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67985202019-10-28 Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Kolb, H. Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Champagne, Ellen Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Hahn, Jordan Roth, Mary-Tara Ennever, Fanny Bajwa, Wajeeh Singh, Meher Homish, Gregory G. Dubocovich, Margarita L. J Clin Transl Sci Education INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted. RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later. DISCUSSION: The course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6798520/ /pubmed/31660222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Education Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Kolb, H. Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Champagne, Ellen Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Hahn, Jordan Roth, Mary-Tara Ennever, Fanny Bajwa, Wajeeh Singh, Meher Homish, Gregory G. Dubocovich, Margarita L. Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title | Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title_full | Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title_fullStr | Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title_full_unstemmed | Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title_short | Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
title_sort | best practices in social and behavioral research: a multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course |
topic | Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphysusanl bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT samuelseliasm bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT kolbhrobert bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT beharhorensteinlindas bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT champagneellen bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT byksjazayerichristine bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT hahnjordan bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT rothmarytara bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT enneverfanny bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT bajwawajeeh bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT singhmeher bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT homishgregoryg bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse AT dubocovichmargarital bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse |