Cargando…

Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course

INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Susan L., Samuels, Elias M., Kolb, H. Robert, Behar-Horenstein, Linda S., Champagne, Ellen, Byks-Jazayeri, Christine, Hahn, Jordan, Roth, Mary-Tara, Ennever, Fanny, Bajwa, Wajeeh, Singh, Meher, Homish, Gregory G., Dubocovich, Margarita L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27
_version_ 1783460065507803136
author Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Kolb, H. Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Champagne, Ellen
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Hahn, Jordan
Roth, Mary-Tara
Ennever, Fanny
Bajwa, Wajeeh
Singh, Meher
Homish, Gregory G.
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
author_facet Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Kolb, H. Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Champagne, Ellen
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Hahn, Jordan
Roth, Mary-Tara
Ennever, Fanny
Bajwa, Wajeeh
Singh, Meher
Homish, Gregory G.
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
author_sort Murphy, Susan L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted. RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later. DISCUSSION: The course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67985202019-10-28 Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Kolb, H. Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Champagne, Ellen Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Hahn, Jordan Roth, Mary-Tara Ennever, Fanny Bajwa, Wajeeh Singh, Meher Homish, Gregory G. Dubocovich, Margarita L. J Clin Transl Sci Education INTRODUCTION: The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course. METHODS: Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted. RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later. DISCUSSION: The course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6798520/ /pubmed/31660222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Education
Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Kolb, H. Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Champagne, Ellen
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Hahn, Jordan
Roth, Mary-Tara
Ennever, Fanny
Bajwa, Wajeeh
Singh, Meher
Homish, Gregory G.
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title_full Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title_fullStr Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title_full_unstemmed Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title_short Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
title_sort best practices in social and behavioral research: a multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.27
work_keys_str_mv AT murphysusanl bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT samuelseliasm bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT kolbhrobert bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT beharhorensteinlindas bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT champagneellen bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT byksjazayerichristine bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT hahnjordan bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT rothmarytara bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT enneverfanny bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT bajwawajeeh bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT singhmeher bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT homishgregoryg bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse
AT dubocovichmargarital bestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluationofthegoodclinicalpracticeonlinetrainingcourse