Cargando…
Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a liv...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361435 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043 |
_version_ | 1783460080920821760 |
---|---|
author | Metello, José Luis Tomás, Claudia Ferreira, Pedro |
author_facet | Metello, José Luis Tomás, Claudia Ferreira, Pedro |
author_sort | Metello, José Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a live birth. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in our center between 2012 and 2016. We considered only those cycles with a live birth delivery after 24 weeks, or cycles with no surplus embryos left. The following data was evaluated: AMH; AFC; age; BMI; previous diagnosis; type of treatment; number of previous deliveries; ethnicity, smoking status. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine the association of live birth with baseline patient characteristics. We determined the odds-ratio for all the statistically significant variables (p<0.05), in a multivariate model. The results are presented according to the predictors founded. RESULTS: 739 cycles were evaluated: 9.1% were canceled; 10.2% did not have oocytes; 15.6% did not have D2 embryos; 31.4% achieved a live birth. The univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences regarding AMH, AFC and women’s age between couples with and without a live birth (p<0.001), and the cause of infertility. We found no association with live births in other variables. These variables were categorized and used in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Age, AMH, AFC and cause, when sub-classified, are independently associated with the results of an IVF/ICSI treatment. These results enable couples to face real expectations in their particular scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6798599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67985992019-10-22 Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? Metello, José Luis Tomás, Claudia Ferreira, Pedro JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a live birth. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in our center between 2012 and 2016. We considered only those cycles with a live birth delivery after 24 weeks, or cycles with no surplus embryos left. The following data was evaluated: AMH; AFC; age; BMI; previous diagnosis; type of treatment; number of previous deliveries; ethnicity, smoking status. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine the association of live birth with baseline patient characteristics. We determined the odds-ratio for all the statistically significant variables (p<0.05), in a multivariate model. The results are presented according to the predictors founded. RESULTS: 739 cycles were evaluated: 9.1% were canceled; 10.2% did not have oocytes; 15.6% did not have D2 embryos; 31.4% achieved a live birth. The univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences regarding AMH, AFC and women’s age between couples with and without a live birth (p<0.001), and the cause of infertility. We found no association with live births in other variables. These variables were categorized and used in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Age, AMH, AFC and cause, when sub-classified, are independently associated with the results of an IVF/ICSI treatment. These results enable couples to face real expectations in their particular scenario. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6798599/ /pubmed/31361435 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Metello, José Luis Tomás, Claudia Ferreira, Pedro Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title | Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title_full | Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title_fullStr | Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title_short | Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? |
title_sort | can we predict the ivf/icsi live birth rate? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361435 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metellojoseluis canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate AT tomasclaudia canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate AT ferreirapedro canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate |