Cargando…

Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?

OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a liv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metello, José Luis, Tomás, Claudia, Ferreira, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361435
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043
_version_ 1783460080920821760
author Metello, José Luis
Tomás, Claudia
Ferreira, Pedro
author_facet Metello, José Luis
Tomás, Claudia
Ferreira, Pedro
author_sort Metello, José Luis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a live birth. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in our center between 2012 and 2016. We considered only those cycles with a live birth delivery after 24 weeks, or cycles with no surplus embryos left. The following data was evaluated: AMH; AFC; age; BMI; previous diagnosis; type of treatment; number of previous deliveries; ethnicity, smoking status. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine the association of live birth with baseline patient characteristics. We determined the odds-ratio for all the statistically significant variables (p<0.05), in a multivariate model. The results are presented according to the predictors founded. RESULTS: 739 cycles were evaluated: 9.1% were canceled; 10.2% did not have oocytes; 15.6% did not have D2 embryos; 31.4% achieved a live birth. The univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences regarding AMH, AFC and women’s age between couples with and without a live birth (p<0.001), and the cause of infertility. We found no association with live births in other variables. These variables were categorized and used in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Age, AMH, AFC and cause, when sub-classified, are independently associated with the results of an IVF/ICSI treatment. These results enable couples to face real expectations in their particular scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67985992019-10-22 Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate? Metello, José Luis Tomás, Claudia Ferreira, Pedro JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVES: To find a pretreatment predictor for achieving a live birth. Assisted reproduction technology with IVF/ICSI is the ultimate chance for some couples to conceive a child. The expectations are high and it is important to give them a realistic perspective about the chances of achieving a live birth. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in our center between 2012 and 2016. We considered only those cycles with a live birth delivery after 24 weeks, or cycles with no surplus embryos left. The following data was evaluated: AMH; AFC; age; BMI; previous diagnosis; type of treatment; number of previous deliveries; ethnicity, smoking status. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine the association of live birth with baseline patient characteristics. We determined the odds-ratio for all the statistically significant variables (p<0.05), in a multivariate model. The results are presented according to the predictors founded. RESULTS: 739 cycles were evaluated: 9.1% were canceled; 10.2% did not have oocytes; 15.6% did not have D2 embryos; 31.4% achieved a live birth. The univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences regarding AMH, AFC and women’s age between couples with and without a live birth (p<0.001), and the cause of infertility. We found no association with live births in other variables. These variables were categorized and used in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Age, AMH, AFC and cause, when sub-classified, are independently associated with the results of an IVF/ICSI treatment. These results enable couples to face real expectations in their particular scenario. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6798599/ /pubmed/31361435 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Metello, José Luis
Tomás, Claudia
Ferreira, Pedro
Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title_full Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title_fullStr Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title_full_unstemmed Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title_short Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?
title_sort can we predict the ivf/icsi live birth rate?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361435
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190043
work_keys_str_mv AT metellojoseluis canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate
AT tomasclaudia canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate
AT ferreirapedro canwepredicttheivficsilivebirthrate