Cargando…

PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation

Little is known about risk compensation among female sex workers (FSW) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and self-report of sexual behaviors is subject to bias. SETTING: Prospective observational PrEP demonstration study conducted among FSW in Cotonou, Benin. METHODS: Over a period of 24 month...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giguère, Katia, Béhanzin, Luc, Guédou, Fernand A., Talbot, Denis, Leblond, François A., Goma-Matsétsé, Ella, Zannou, Djimon M., Affolabi, Dissou, Kêkê, René K., Gangbo, Flore, Bachabi, Moussa, Alary, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002134
_version_ 1783460125376249856
author Giguère, Katia
Béhanzin, Luc
Guédou, Fernand A.
Talbot, Denis
Leblond, François A.
Goma-Matsétsé, Ella
Zannou, Djimon M.
Affolabi, Dissou
Kêkê, René K.
Gangbo, Flore
Bachabi, Moussa
Alary, Michel
author_facet Giguère, Katia
Béhanzin, Luc
Guédou, Fernand A.
Talbot, Denis
Leblond, François A.
Goma-Matsétsé, Ella
Zannou, Djimon M.
Affolabi, Dissou
Kêkê, René K.
Gangbo, Flore
Bachabi, Moussa
Alary, Michel
author_sort Giguère, Katia
collection PubMed
description Little is known about risk compensation among female sex workers (FSW) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and self-report of sexual behaviors is subject to bias. SETTING: Prospective observational PrEP demonstration study conducted among FSW in Cotonou, Benin. METHODS: Over a period of 24 months, we assessed and compared trends in unprotected sex as measured by self-report (last 2 or 14 days), by detection of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and by vaginal detection of prostate-specific antigen and Y-chromosomal DNA, 2 biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 or 14 days, respectively. Trends were assessed and compared using a log-binomial regression that was simultaneously fit for all unprotected sex measures. RESULTS: Of 255 participants, 120 (47.1%) completed their follow-up. Prevalence of STI decreased from 15.8% (95% confidence interval: 11.8% to 21.0%) at baseline to 2.1% (95% confidence interval: 0.4% to 10.2%) at 24 months of follow-up (P-trend = 0.04). However, we observed no trend in self-report of unprotected sex in the last 2 (P = 0.42) or 14 days (P = 0.49), nor in prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.53) or Y chromosomal DNA (P = 0.25) over the same period. We observed no statistically significant difference between trends in self-report of unprotected sex and trends in biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 days (P = 0.14) or in the last 14 days (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no evidence of risk compensation, and a decrease in STI among FSW on PrEP. PrEP intervention may be an opportunity to control STI among FSW. Future studies should assess risk compensation with biomarkers of semen exposure when possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67987372019-11-18 PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation Giguère, Katia Béhanzin, Luc Guédou, Fernand A. Talbot, Denis Leblond, François A. Goma-Matsétsé, Ella Zannou, Djimon M. Affolabi, Dissou Kêkê, René K. Gangbo, Flore Bachabi, Moussa Alary, Michel J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Prevention Research Little is known about risk compensation among female sex workers (FSW) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and self-report of sexual behaviors is subject to bias. SETTING: Prospective observational PrEP demonstration study conducted among FSW in Cotonou, Benin. METHODS: Over a period of 24 months, we assessed and compared trends in unprotected sex as measured by self-report (last 2 or 14 days), by detection of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and by vaginal detection of prostate-specific antigen and Y-chromosomal DNA, 2 biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 or 14 days, respectively. Trends were assessed and compared using a log-binomial regression that was simultaneously fit for all unprotected sex measures. RESULTS: Of 255 participants, 120 (47.1%) completed their follow-up. Prevalence of STI decreased from 15.8% (95% confidence interval: 11.8% to 21.0%) at baseline to 2.1% (95% confidence interval: 0.4% to 10.2%) at 24 months of follow-up (P-trend = 0.04). However, we observed no trend in self-report of unprotected sex in the last 2 (P = 0.42) or 14 days (P = 0.49), nor in prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.53) or Y chromosomal DNA (P = 0.25) over the same period. We observed no statistically significant difference between trends in self-report of unprotected sex and trends in biomarkers of semen exposure in the last 2 days (P = 0.14) or in the last 14 days (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no evidence of risk compensation, and a decrease in STI among FSW on PrEP. PrEP intervention may be an opportunity to control STI among FSW. Future studies should assess risk compensation with biomarkers of semen exposure when possible. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2019-11-01 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6798737/ /pubmed/31356468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002134 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Prevention Research
Giguère, Katia
Béhanzin, Luc
Guédou, Fernand A.
Talbot, Denis
Leblond, François A.
Goma-Matsétsé, Ella
Zannou, Djimon M.
Affolabi, Dissou
Kêkê, René K.
Gangbo, Flore
Bachabi, Moussa
Alary, Michel
PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title_full PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title_fullStr PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title_full_unstemmed PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title_short PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation
title_sort prep use among female sex workers: no evidence for risk compensation
topic Prevention Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002134
work_keys_str_mv AT giguerekatia prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT behanzinluc prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT guedoufernanda prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT talbotdenis prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT leblondfrancoisa prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT gomamatsetseella prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT zannoudjimonm prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT affolabidissou prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT kekerenek prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT gangboflore prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT bachabimoussa prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation
AT alarymichel prepuseamongfemalesexworkersnoevidenceforriskcompensation