Cargando…
2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206 |
_version_ | 1783460172172099584 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Champagne, Ellen Hahn, Jordan Eakin, Brenda Kolb, Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Gardner, Susan Ennever, Fanny Roth, Mary-Tara Dubocovich, Margarita L. |
author_facet | Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Champagne, Ellen Hahn, Jordan Eakin, Brenda Kolb, Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Gardner, Susan Ennever, Fanny Roth, Mary-Tara Dubocovich, Margarita L. |
author_sort | Murphy, Susan L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient progress through the training, perceived relevance of the course to current work, level of engagement with the course material, intent to work differently as a result of the course, and downloading digital resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8 on a 7-point Likert scale) and 96% of respondents said they would recommend the course to colleagues. Qualitative analysis of participant testimonials suggested that most respondents had a readiness to change in the way they worked as a result of the course. Overall, results suggest participants completed the course efficiently, perceived outcomes positively and worked differently after the training. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results will inform new guidelines for future participants (e.g., average time to complete, expectations for knowledge checks in the training). Future studies should include larger samples and closer coordination and communication between study sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6798947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67989472019-10-28 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Champagne, Ellen Hahn, Jordan Eakin, Brenda Kolb, Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Gardner, Susan Ennever, Fanny Roth, Mary-Tara Dubocovich, Margarita L. J Clin Transl Sci Basic/Translational Science/Team Science OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient progress through the training, perceived relevance of the course to current work, level of engagement with the course material, intent to work differently as a result of the course, and downloading digital resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8 on a 7-point Likert scale) and 96% of respondents said they would recommend the course to colleagues. Qualitative analysis of participant testimonials suggested that most respondents had a readiness to change in the way they worked as a result of the course. Overall, results suggest participants completed the course efficiently, perceived outcomes positively and worked differently after the training. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results will inform new guidelines for future participants (e.g., average time to complete, expectations for knowledge checks in the training). Future studies should include larger samples and closer coordination and communication between study sites. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6798947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Basic/Translational Science/Team Science Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Champagne, Ellen Hahn, Jordan Eakin, Brenda Kolb, Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Gardner, Susan Ennever, Fanny Roth, Mary-Tara Dubocovich, Margarita L. 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title | 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title_full | 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title_fullStr | 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title_short | 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation |
title_sort | 2526 e-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: a multisite pilot evaluation |
topic | Basic/Translational Science/Team Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphysusanl 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT samuelseliasm 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT byksjazayerichristine 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT champagneellen 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT hahnjordan 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT eakinbrenda 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT kolbrobert 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT beharhorensteinlindas 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT gardnersusan 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT enneverfanny 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT rothmarytara 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation AT dubocovichmargarital 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation |