Cargando…

2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Susan L., Samuels, Elias M., Byks-Jazayeri, Christine, Champagne, Ellen, Hahn, Jordan, Eakin, Brenda, Kolb, Robert, Behar-Horenstein, Linda S., Gardner, Susan, Ennever, Fanny, Roth, Mary-Tara, Dubocovich, Margarita L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206
_version_ 1783460172172099584
author Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Champagne, Ellen
Hahn, Jordan
Eakin, Brenda
Kolb, Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Gardner, Susan
Ennever, Fanny
Roth, Mary-Tara
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
author_facet Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Champagne, Ellen
Hahn, Jordan
Eakin, Brenda
Kolb, Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Gardner, Susan
Ennever, Fanny
Roth, Mary-Tara
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
author_sort Murphy, Susan L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient progress through the training, perceived relevance of the course to current work, level of engagement with the course material, intent to work differently as a result of the course, and downloading digital resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8 on a 7-point Likert scale) and 96% of respondents said they would recommend the course to colleagues. Qualitative analysis of participant testimonials suggested that most respondents had a readiness to change in the way they worked as a result of the course. Overall, results suggest participants completed the course efficiently, perceived outcomes positively and worked differently after the training. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results will inform new guidelines for future participants (e.g., average time to complete, expectations for knowledge checks in the training). Future studies should include larger samples and closer coordination and communication between study sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67989472019-10-28 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation Murphy, Susan L. Samuels, Elias M. Byks-Jazayeri, Christine Champagne, Ellen Hahn, Jordan Eakin, Brenda Kolb, Robert Behar-Horenstein, Linda S. Gardner, Susan Ennever, Fanny Roth, Mary-Tara Dubocovich, Margarita L. J Clin Transl Sci Basic/Translational Science/Team Science OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To evaluate the NIH-sponsored Best Practices for Social and Behavioral Research e-learning course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four universities partnered in a pilot study to evaluate this new course. Outcomes from 294 participants completing the course included efficient progress through the training, perceived relevance of the course to current work, level of engagement with the course material, intent to work differently as a result of the course, and downloading digital resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8 on a 7-point Likert scale) and 96% of respondents said they would recommend the course to colleagues. Qualitative analysis of participant testimonials suggested that most respondents had a readiness to change in the way they worked as a result of the course. Overall, results suggest participants completed the course efficiently, perceived outcomes positively and worked differently after the training. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results will inform new guidelines for future participants (e.g., average time to complete, expectations for knowledge checks in the training). Future studies should include larger samples and closer coordination and communication between study sites. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6798947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
Murphy, Susan L.
Samuels, Elias M.
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine
Champagne, Ellen
Hahn, Jordan
Eakin, Brenda
Kolb, Robert
Behar-Horenstein, Linda S.
Gardner, Susan
Ennever, Fanny
Roth, Mary-Tara
Dubocovich, Margarita L.
2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title_full 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title_fullStr 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title_full_unstemmed 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title_short 2526 E-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: A multisite pilot evaluation
title_sort 2526 e-learning for best practices in social and behavioral research: a multisite pilot evaluation
topic Basic/Translational Science/Team Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.206
work_keys_str_mv AT murphysusanl 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT samuelseliasm 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT byksjazayerichristine 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT champagneellen 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT hahnjordan 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT eakinbrenda 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT kolbrobert 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT beharhorensteinlindas 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT gardnersusan 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT enneverfanny 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT rothmarytara 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation
AT dubocovichmargarital 2526elearningforbestpracticesinsocialandbehavioralresearchamultisitepilotevaluation