Cargando…

2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To develop an algorithm that identifies post-concussion syndrome (PCS) cases and controls from among patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a large academic biobank. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s (VUMC) electronic medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Jessica, Zuckerman, Scott, Yengo-Kahn, Aaron, Cox, Nancy, Solomon, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798965/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.76
_version_ 1783460177335287808
author Dennis, Jessica
Zuckerman, Scott
Yengo-Kahn, Aaron
Cox, Nancy
Solomon, Gary
author_facet Dennis, Jessica
Zuckerman, Scott
Yengo-Kahn, Aaron
Cox, Nancy
Solomon, Gary
author_sort Dennis, Jessica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To develop an algorithm that identifies post-concussion syndrome (PCS) cases and controls from among patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a large academic biobank. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s (VUMC) electronic medical record (EMR) research database includes longitudinal medical record data on 2.5 million people. DNA and genotype data were also available for >225,000 of these individuals. Our algorithm used a combination of billing codes and natural language processing to apply inclusion and exclusion criteria. We defined PCS cases as those with a PCS billing code (ICD-9 310.2 or ICD-10 F07.81) and/or symptoms of PCS within 1–6 months of a qualifying mTBI. We will compare the positive predictive value of our algorithm to that of 2 simpler case selection schemes: (1) 1 instance of the PCS billing code anywhere in the medical record; and (2) 2 or more instances of the PCS billing code anywhere in the medical record. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: An mTBI was diagnosed in 28,720 patients regularly attending VUMC, and 528 of these patients were classified as PCS cases by our algorithm. The characteristics of our EMR sample reflected known risk factors for PCS. Our cases were more likely than controls to be female (49.4% vs. 38.4%), to have sustained a previous TBI (31.0% vs. 12.0%) and to have comorbid mood disorders. Our PCS cases were also more likely than controls to be <18 years of age (42.4% vs. 33.6%) and to have a sports-related keyword associated with the mTBI (44.1% vs. 25.2%), emphasizing the relevance of PCS to young athletes. Nonetheless, the number of PCS cases identified by our algorithm was small, and within the VUMC EMR, there were 5039 patients with 1 PCS billing code, and 2457 patients with 2 or more PCS billing codes anywhere in their EMR. Our next step is to calculate the positive predictive values of each selection scheme by manually reviewing the EMR of a selection of cases. Ultimately, we will implement the selection scheme that maximizes both positive predictive value and sample size, and in future work, we will genotype the selected patients to better understand the genetic architecture of PCS. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: EMR and biobanks are the future of human health research, and we asked whether complex algorithms or simple billing codes were best for studying the genetics of recovery after mTBI within the VUMC EMR. Our results are relevant to other studies of brain injury phenotypes within biobanks, including recovery from moderate or severe TBI, recovery from stroke, or the occurrence of delirium after routine surgery, and will help transform biobanks into fruitful research tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67989652019-10-28 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks? Dennis, Jessica Zuckerman, Scott Yengo-Kahn, Aaron Cox, Nancy Solomon, Gary J Clin Transl Sci Biomedical Informatics/Health Informatics OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To develop an algorithm that identifies post-concussion syndrome (PCS) cases and controls from among patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a large academic biobank. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s (VUMC) electronic medical record (EMR) research database includes longitudinal medical record data on 2.5 million people. DNA and genotype data were also available for >225,000 of these individuals. Our algorithm used a combination of billing codes and natural language processing to apply inclusion and exclusion criteria. We defined PCS cases as those with a PCS billing code (ICD-9 310.2 or ICD-10 F07.81) and/or symptoms of PCS within 1–6 months of a qualifying mTBI. We will compare the positive predictive value of our algorithm to that of 2 simpler case selection schemes: (1) 1 instance of the PCS billing code anywhere in the medical record; and (2) 2 or more instances of the PCS billing code anywhere in the medical record. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: An mTBI was diagnosed in 28,720 patients regularly attending VUMC, and 528 of these patients were classified as PCS cases by our algorithm. The characteristics of our EMR sample reflected known risk factors for PCS. Our cases were more likely than controls to be female (49.4% vs. 38.4%), to have sustained a previous TBI (31.0% vs. 12.0%) and to have comorbid mood disorders. Our PCS cases were also more likely than controls to be <18 years of age (42.4% vs. 33.6%) and to have a sports-related keyword associated with the mTBI (44.1% vs. 25.2%), emphasizing the relevance of PCS to young athletes. Nonetheless, the number of PCS cases identified by our algorithm was small, and within the VUMC EMR, there were 5039 patients with 1 PCS billing code, and 2457 patients with 2 or more PCS billing codes anywhere in their EMR. Our next step is to calculate the positive predictive values of each selection scheme by manually reviewing the EMR of a selection of cases. Ultimately, we will implement the selection scheme that maximizes both positive predictive value and sample size, and in future work, we will genotype the selected patients to better understand the genetic architecture of PCS. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: EMR and biobanks are the future of human health research, and we asked whether complex algorithms or simple billing codes were best for studying the genetics of recovery after mTBI within the VUMC EMR. Our results are relevant to other studies of brain injury phenotypes within biobanks, including recovery from moderate or severe TBI, recovery from stroke, or the occurrence of delirium after routine surgery, and will help transform biobanks into fruitful research tools. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6798965/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.76 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Biomedical Informatics/Health Informatics
Dennis, Jessica
Zuckerman, Scott
Yengo-Kahn, Aaron
Cox, Nancy
Solomon, Gary
2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title_full 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title_fullStr 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title_full_unstemmed 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title_short 2456: Genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: Can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to DNA biobanks?
title_sort 2456: genetic determinants of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: can study samples be identified from electronic medical records linked to dna biobanks?
topic Biomedical Informatics/Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798965/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.76
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisjessica 2456geneticdeterminantsofrecoveryaftermildtraumaticbraininjurycanstudysamplesbeidentifiedfromelectronicmedicalrecordslinkedtodnabiobanks
AT zuckermanscott 2456geneticdeterminantsofrecoveryaftermildtraumaticbraininjurycanstudysamplesbeidentifiedfromelectronicmedicalrecordslinkedtodnabiobanks
AT yengokahnaaron 2456geneticdeterminantsofrecoveryaftermildtraumaticbraininjurycanstudysamplesbeidentifiedfromelectronicmedicalrecordslinkedtodnabiobanks
AT coxnancy 2456geneticdeterminantsofrecoveryaftermildtraumaticbraininjurycanstudysamplesbeidentifiedfromelectronicmedicalrecordslinkedtodnabiobanks
AT solomongary 2456geneticdeterminantsofrecoveryaftermildtraumaticbraininjurycanstudysamplesbeidentifiedfromelectronicmedicalrecordslinkedtodnabiobanks