Cargando…
2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283 |
_version_ | 1783460193618624512 |
---|---|
author | Pelfrey, Clara Cain, Katrice Ellen Lawless, Mary Pike, Earl Sehgal, Ashwini |
author_facet | Pelfrey, Clara Cain, Katrice Ellen Lawless, Mary Pike, Earl Sehgal, Ashwini |
author_sort | Pelfrey, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service at a CTSA hub. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A CBR consult service was created to support faculty, healthcare providers/research coordinators, trainees, community-based organizations, and community members. A framework was developed to assess the stages of client engagement and to foster clear articulation of client needs and challenges. A developmental evaluation system was integrated with the framework to track progress, store documents, continuously improve the consult service, and assess research outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This framework provides information on client numbers, types, services used, and successful outreach methods. Tracking progress reveals reasons that prevent clients from completing projects and facilitates learning outcomes relevant to clients and funding agencies. Clients benefit from the expert knowledge, community connections, and project guidance provided by the consult service team, increasing the likelihood of study completion and achieving research outcomes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our evaluation suggests that clients benefit by (1) gaining the collective knowledge of the experts comprising the team, (2) learning the process of doing CBR, including the required steps to reach completion, and (3) gaining a project management mentality promoting translational research outcomes. This study offers a framework by which CTSA institutions can expand their capacity to conduct and evaluate CBR while addressing challenges that inhibit community engagement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6799032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67990322019-10-28 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts Pelfrey, Clara Cain, Katrice Ellen Lawless, Mary Pike, Earl Sehgal, Ashwini J Clin Transl Sci Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service at a CTSA hub. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A CBR consult service was created to support faculty, healthcare providers/research coordinators, trainees, community-based organizations, and community members. A framework was developed to assess the stages of client engagement and to foster clear articulation of client needs and challenges. A developmental evaluation system was integrated with the framework to track progress, store documents, continuously improve the consult service, and assess research outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This framework provides information on client numbers, types, services used, and successful outreach methods. Tracking progress reveals reasons that prevent clients from completing projects and facilitates learning outcomes relevant to clients and funding agencies. Clients benefit from the expert knowledge, community connections, and project guidance provided by the consult service team, increasing the likelihood of study completion and achieving research outcomes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our evaluation suggests that clients benefit by (1) gaining the collective knowledge of the experts comprising the team, (2) learning the process of doing CBR, including the required steps to reach completion, and (3) gaining a project management mentality promoting translational research outcomes. This study offers a framework by which CTSA institutions can expand their capacity to conduct and evaluate CBR while addressing challenges that inhibit community engagement. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6799032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness Pelfrey, Clara Cain, Katrice Ellen Lawless, Mary Pike, Earl Sehgal, Ashwini 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title | 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title_full | 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title_fullStr | 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title_full_unstemmed | 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title_short | 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts |
title_sort | 2483: evaluating a community research consult service: getting to outcomes and impacts |
topic | Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pelfreyclara 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts AT cainkatrice 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts AT ellenlawlessmary 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts AT pikeearl 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts AT sehgalashwini 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts |