Cargando…

2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelfrey, Clara, Cain, Katrice, Ellen Lawless, Mary, Pike, Earl, Sehgal, Ashwini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283
_version_ 1783460193618624512
author Pelfrey, Clara
Cain, Katrice
Ellen Lawless, Mary
Pike, Earl
Sehgal, Ashwini
author_facet Pelfrey, Clara
Cain, Katrice
Ellen Lawless, Mary
Pike, Earl
Sehgal, Ashwini
author_sort Pelfrey, Clara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service at a CTSA hub. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A CBR consult service was created to support faculty, healthcare providers/research coordinators, trainees, community-based organizations, and community members. A framework was developed to assess the stages of client engagement and to foster clear articulation of client needs and challenges. A developmental evaluation system was integrated with the framework to track progress, store documents, continuously improve the consult service, and assess research outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This framework provides information on client numbers, types, services used, and successful outreach methods. Tracking progress reveals reasons that prevent clients from completing projects and facilitates learning outcomes relevant to clients and funding agencies. Clients benefit from the expert knowledge, community connections, and project guidance provided by the consult service team, increasing the likelihood of study completion and achieving research outcomes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our evaluation suggests that clients benefit by (1) gaining the collective knowledge of the experts comprising the team, (2) learning the process of doing CBR, including the required steps to reach completion, and (3) gaining a project management mentality promoting translational research outcomes. This study offers a framework by which CTSA institutions can expand their capacity to conduct and evaluate CBR while addressing challenges that inhibit community engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67990322019-10-28 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts Pelfrey, Clara Cain, Katrice Ellen Lawless, Mary Pike, Earl Sehgal, Ashwini J Clin Transl Sci Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study describes the design, operation, and evaluation of a community-based research (CBR) consult service within the setting of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institution. To our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of a CBR consult service at a CTSA hub. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A CBR consult service was created to support faculty, healthcare providers/research coordinators, trainees, community-based organizations, and community members. A framework was developed to assess the stages of client engagement and to foster clear articulation of client needs and challenges. A developmental evaluation system was integrated with the framework to track progress, store documents, continuously improve the consult service, and assess research outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This framework provides information on client numbers, types, services used, and successful outreach methods. Tracking progress reveals reasons that prevent clients from completing projects and facilitates learning outcomes relevant to clients and funding agencies. Clients benefit from the expert knowledge, community connections, and project guidance provided by the consult service team, increasing the likelihood of study completion and achieving research outcomes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our evaluation suggests that clients benefit by (1) gaining the collective knowledge of the experts comprising the team, (2) learning the process of doing CBR, including the required steps to reach completion, and (3) gaining a project management mentality promoting translational research outcomes. This study offers a framework by which CTSA institutions can expand their capacity to conduct and evaluate CBR while addressing challenges that inhibit community engagement. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6799032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness
Pelfrey, Clara
Cain, Katrice
Ellen Lawless, Mary
Pike, Earl
Sehgal, Ashwini
2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title_full 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title_fullStr 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title_full_unstemmed 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title_short 2483: Evaluating a community research consult service: Getting to outcomes and impacts
title_sort 2483: evaluating a community research consult service: getting to outcomes and impacts
topic Outcomes Research/Health Services Research/Comparative Effectiveness
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.283
work_keys_str_mv AT pelfreyclara 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts
AT cainkatrice 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts
AT ellenlawlessmary 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts
AT pikeearl 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts
AT sehgalashwini 2483evaluatingacommunityresearchconsultservicegettingtooutcomesandimpacts