Cargando…

2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The current pilot study will use a mixed methods approach to investigate the role of psychological mechanisms in the relationship between food insecurity and obesity. We will be the first to assess 4 key psychological constructs (delay discounting, grit, future time perspec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myers, Candice A., Broyles, Stephanie T., Martin, Corby K., Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799082/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.259
_version_ 1783460205923663872
author Myers, Candice A.
Broyles, Stephanie T.
Martin, Corby K.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
author_facet Myers, Candice A.
Broyles, Stephanie T.
Martin, Corby K.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
author_sort Myers, Candice A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The current pilot study will use a mixed methods approach to investigate the role of psychological mechanisms in the relationship between food insecurity and obesity. We will be the first to assess 4 key psychological constructs (delay discounting, grit, future time perspective, and subjective social status) in a sample of food secure and food insecure adults with and without obesity. The specific aims are: (1) Examine associations among psychological mechanisms, food security status, and body mass index (BMI); and (2) Collect qualitative data on psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and BMI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is a cross-sectional, observational pilot study that will be conducted in the local Baton Rouge community. The target study sample is 56 food secure and food insecure women and men aged 18–49 years with a BMI of 20.0 kg/m(2) or greater. Independent (grouping) variables are food security status and BMI. Primary endpoints are 4 psychological constructs measured via questionnaires: (1) delay discounting, (2) grit, (3) future time perspective, and (4) subjective social status. We will also assess a number of key covariates, including health literacy, sociodemographics, food assistance use, and dietary quality. Semistructured, in-depth interviews will be conducted in a subsample of 12 participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For quantitative data, we will test for significant associations between food insecurity, obesity, and selected psychological mechanisms via bivariate correlations and linear and logistic regression models. Qualitative data will be analyzed to identify key themes and concepts that conceptually link the aforementioned psychological mechanisms to food insecurity and obesity. Analyzed qualitative data will be triangulated with quantitative findings. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This pilot study will examine the role of psychological mechanisms in the relationship between food insecurity and obesity. Moreover, we are gathering data to identify potentially new intervention targets that will be used to develop intervention strategies aimed at reducing health disparities by effectively promoting weight management among low socioeconomic populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6799082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67990822019-10-28 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity Myers, Candice A. Broyles, Stephanie T. Martin, Corby K. Katzmarzyk, Peter T. J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity & Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The current pilot study will use a mixed methods approach to investigate the role of psychological mechanisms in the relationship between food insecurity and obesity. We will be the first to assess 4 key psychological constructs (delay discounting, grit, future time perspective, and subjective social status) in a sample of food secure and food insecure adults with and without obesity. The specific aims are: (1) Examine associations among psychological mechanisms, food security status, and body mass index (BMI); and (2) Collect qualitative data on psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and BMI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is a cross-sectional, observational pilot study that will be conducted in the local Baton Rouge community. The target study sample is 56 food secure and food insecure women and men aged 18–49 years with a BMI of 20.0 kg/m(2) or greater. Independent (grouping) variables are food security status and BMI. Primary endpoints are 4 psychological constructs measured via questionnaires: (1) delay discounting, (2) grit, (3) future time perspective, and (4) subjective social status. We will also assess a number of key covariates, including health literacy, sociodemographics, food assistance use, and dietary quality. Semistructured, in-depth interviews will be conducted in a subsample of 12 participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For quantitative data, we will test for significant associations between food insecurity, obesity, and selected psychological mechanisms via bivariate correlations and linear and logistic regression models. Qualitative data will be analyzed to identify key themes and concepts that conceptually link the aforementioned psychological mechanisms to food insecurity and obesity. Analyzed qualitative data will be triangulated with quantitative findings. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This pilot study will examine the role of psychological mechanisms in the relationship between food insecurity and obesity. Moreover, we are gathering data to identify potentially new intervention targets that will be used to develop intervention strategies aimed at reducing health disparities by effectively promoting weight management among low socioeconomic populations. Cambridge University Press 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6799082/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.259 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health Equity & Community Engagement
Myers, Candice A.
Broyles, Stephanie T.
Martin, Corby K.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title_full 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title_fullStr 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title_full_unstemmed 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title_short 2011 Psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
title_sort 2011 psychological mechanisms linking food insecurity and obesity
topic Health Equity & Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6799082/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.259
work_keys_str_mv AT myerscandicea 2011psychologicalmechanismslinkingfoodinsecurityandobesity
AT broylesstephaniet 2011psychologicalmechanismslinkingfoodinsecurityandobesity
AT martincorbyk 2011psychologicalmechanismslinkingfoodinsecurityandobesity
AT katzmarzykpetert 2011psychologicalmechanismslinkingfoodinsecurityandobesity